Greetings again,
#1
Changes rejected:
mini-httpd_1.30-4.dsc: Invalid size hash for mini-
httpd_1.30.orig.tar.gz:
According to the control file the size hash should be 43469,
but mini-httpd_1.30.orig.tar.gz has 43889.
If you did not include mini-httpd_1.30.orig.tar.gz in your upload, a
different v
Hi Alexandru,
Alexandru Mihail writes:
>> # Fix git config email and gpg identity, then
[snip]
>>
> I fixed my git config and redid the tag as discussed above
Thanks!
>> Sorry I only noticed this when I manually inspected and compared the
>> tag
> Yeah, sorry too :)
> I'll be going on vacat
Hello Nicholas,
> Did you realise that you're still committing using your protonmail.ch
> address (and presumably GPG identity)? Early in this process you
> switched to a gmail address, and I understood that that was the one
> that
> you would be using for for your Debian work.
Damn, it seems
On Sun, 3 Sep 2023 01:50:40 -0400 Yogu NY3W wrote:
Changes for the initial release:
a2d (2.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
You should really file an ITP for this package and reference it in the
changelog.
Hello Alexandru,
Thank you for the ping :)
Alexandru Mihail writes:
> I've commited and pushed the changes to the remote I was using for the
> MR so far:
> commit:
> https://salsa.debian.org/alexandru_mihail/mini-httpd/-/commit/fc7c4f664dc1369b1bf5d46c8c9b7aa11de68407
>
>
> But I think I may ha
Your message dated Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:10:54 -0400
with message-id <7677e1e2678ef4be90e1ceb2b4527e0e73456e48.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: jimtcl/0.82-4 -- small-footprint implementation of
Tcl - shared library
has caused the Debian Bug report #1051188,
regarding RFS: jimtcl/0.82-4 -
Control: owner -1 !
Ileana Dumitrescu:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "debianutils":
[..]
Niels Thykier and I will be co-maintaining this package.
I got this. :)
Best regards,
Niels
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 10:33:12AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> With current cloud-compiling approaches, how should we make sure that
> the built package works for the older x86_64 CPUs possible, and especially
> about this Q16 compilation for ImageMagick?
>
> PS, the compilation is done via https://g
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "debianutils":
* Package name : debianutils
Version : 5.12
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstream's web site
Hi,
The ImageMagick has stayed in V6 for too long and I tried to compile its V7
myself to see what the problem might be, and indeed I found a big problem
-- I got "Illegal instruction" when I tried to install the built package
elsewhere.
At first it is almost like *"the built packages cannot be u
Thanks for the feedback on the blog post, I'll update it.
Regarding the last error: there might be a feature you need to patch out or
some benchmarks
On Mon, 4 Sept 2023, 14:36 Axel Kittenberger, <
axel.kittenber...@univie.ac.at> wrote:
> Hello thanks for the heads up.
>
> > In the meantime you
Hello thanks for the heads up.
In the meantime you can try to get the other missing dependencies for
authenticator into debian. scrypt, search-provider and aes-gcm seem
like good starting points. I can recommend reading
https://blog.hackeriet.no/packaging-a-rust-project-for-debian/ to get
sta
On 04.09.2023 13:30, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi,
I signed the package now correctly, the processing E-Mail said:
dvisvgm_3.1.1+ds-1.debian.tar.xz has incorrect size; deleting it
Do I have to re-upload or remove the "associated files" in any way?
The ACCEPTED mail just rolled in. Many thanks!
On 04.09.2023 12:42, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this does
not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the E-Mail that
the upload was succes
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 6:43 AM Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this
> does
> > not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the E-Mail
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this does
> not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the E-Mail that
> the upload was successful and the package is processed.
> In the
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this
does not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the
E-Mail that the upload was successful and the package is processed.
In the meantime I could upload a new revision of texlive-bin, so there
is no g
On 04.09.23 00:38, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
Hi Axel,
Le 01/09/2023 à 13:11, Axel Kittenberger a écrit :
Question 3) Taking the old package as base and after setting up
sbuild modifying it, I currently have following control file:
If fixed this, by taking the rules file from:
https://wiki.deb
Thanks for for the couple replies I got!
On 2023-09-03 08:23, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi Antonio！
>
> On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 2:30 AM Antonio Russo wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I opened an ITP-closing RFS bug about a month and a half ago. It's got 0
>> replies.
>>
>
>>From my past experience, It is rare f
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jimtcl":
* Package name : jimtcl
Version : 0.82-4
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : http://jim.tcl.tk/
* License : TCL
20 matches
Mail list logo
