Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jimtcl":
* Package name : jimtcl
Version : 0.82-4
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : http://jim.tcl.tk/
* License : TCL
Thanks for for the couple replies I got!
On 2023-09-03 08:23, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi Antonio！
>
> On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 2:30 AM Antonio Russo wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I opened an ITP-closing RFS bug about a month and a half ago. It's got 0
>> replies.
>>
>
>>From my past experience, It is rare f
On 04.09.23 00:38, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
Hi Axel,
Le 01/09/2023 à 13:11, Axel Kittenberger a écrit :
Question 3) Taking the old package as base and after setting up
sbuild modifying it, I currently have following control file:
If fixed this, by taking the rules file from:
https://wiki.deb
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this
does not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the
E-Mail that the upload was successful and the package is processed.
In the meantime I could upload a new revision of texlive-bin, so there
is no g
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this does
> not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the E-Mail that
> the upload was successful and the package is processed.
> In the
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 6:43 AM Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this
> does
> > not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the E-Mail
On 04.09.2023 12:42, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this does
not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the E-Mail that
the upload was succes
On 04.09.2023 13:30, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi,
I signed the package now correctly, the processing E-Mail said:
dvisvgm_3.1.1+ds-1.debian.tar.xz has incorrect size; deleting it
Do I have to re-upload or remove the "associated files" in any way?
The ACCEPTED mail just rolled in. Many thanks!
Hello thanks for the heads up.
In the meantime you can try to get the other missing dependencies for
authenticator into debian. scrypt, search-provider and aes-gcm seem
like good starting points. I can recommend reading
https://blog.hackeriet.no/packaging-a-rust-project-for-debian/ to get
sta
Thanks for the feedback on the blog post, I'll update it.
Regarding the last error: there might be a feature you need to patch out or
some benchmarks
On Mon, 4 Sept 2023, 14:36 Axel Kittenberger, <
axel.kittenber...@univie.ac.at> wrote:
> Hello thanks for the heads up.
>
> > In the meantime you
Hi,
The ImageMagick has stayed in V6 for too long and I tried to compile its V7
myself to see what the problem might be, and indeed I found a big problem
-- I got "Illegal instruction" when I tried to install the built package
elsewhere.
At first it is almost like *"the built packages cannot be u
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "debianutils":
* Package name : debianutils
Version : 5.12
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstream's web site
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 10:33:12AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> With current cloud-compiling approaches, how should we make sure that
> the built package works for the older x86_64 CPUs possible, and especially
> about this Q16 compilation for ImageMagick?
>
> PS, the compilation is done via https://g
Control: owner -1 !
Ileana Dumitrescu:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "debianutils":
[..]
Niels Thykier and I will be co-maintaining this package.
I got this. :)
Best regards,
Niels
Your message dated Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:10:54 -0400
with message-id <7677e1e2678ef4be90e1ceb2b4527e0e73456e48.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: jimtcl/0.82-4 -- small-footprint implementation of
Tcl - shared library
has caused the Debian Bug report #1051188,
regarding RFS: jimtcl/0.82-4 -
Hello Alexandru,
Thank you for the ping :)
Alexandru Mihail writes:
> I've commited and pushed the changes to the remote I was using for the
> MR so far:
> commit:
> https://salsa.debian.org/alexandru_mihail/mini-httpd/-/commit/fc7c4f664dc1369b1bf5d46c8c9b7aa11de68407
>
>
> But I think I may ha
On Sun, 3 Sep 2023 01:50:40 -0400 Yogu NY3W wrote:
Changes for the initial release:
a2d (2.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
You should really file an ITP for this package and reference it in the
changelog.
Hello Nicholas,
> Did you realise that you're still committing using your protonmail.ch
> address (and presumably GPG identity)? Early in this process you
> switched to a gmail address, and I understood that that was the one
> that
> you would be using for for your Debian work.
Damn, it seems
Hi Alexandru,
Alexandru Mihail writes:
>> # Fix git config email and gpg identity, then
[snip]
>>
> I fixed my git config and redid the tag as discussed above
Thanks!
>> Sorry I only noticed this when I manually inspected and compared the
>> tag
> Yeah, sorry too :)
> I'll be going on vacat
Greetings again,
#1
Changes rejected:
mini-httpd_1.30-4.dsc: Invalid size hash for mini-
httpd_1.30.orig.tar.gz:
According to the control file the size hash should be 43469,
but mini-httpd_1.30.orig.tar.gz has 43889.
If you did not include mini-httpd_1.30.orig.tar.gz in your upload, a
different v
20 matches
Mail list logo
