Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 07:30:28 +0100
with message-id <874jbw8s1n@zephyr.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1069078: RFS: lua-mode/20210802-4 [RC] [Team] -- Emacs
major-mode for editing Lua programs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069078,
regarding RFS: lua-mode/20210802
Control: retitle -1 RFS: scala-mode-el/1:1.1.0+git20240113.4c6d636-1 [RC]
[Team] -- Emacs major mode for editing scala source code
Xiyue Deng writes:
> Hi,
>
> Xiyue Deng writes:
>
>> Nicholas D Steeves writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Paul Wise writes:
>>>
On Mon, 2023-12-04 at 02:28 -0800,
On 4/19/24 12:24, Alan M Varghese wrote:
If you feel it is worth it to push from my repo, please feel free to
do so.
Or, I am also okay with it if you just keep what you have done there
and we can iterate on top of it without pushing from my repo (from a
cursory look,
we just need to
Sean Whitton writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu 18 Apr 2024 at 06:24pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>
>> Sean Whitton writes:
>>
>>> control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>>>
>>> Hello Xiyue,
>>>
>>> Please explain the autopkgtest_keep change. Remember that autopkgtests
>>> are to test the installed package. If you n
Hello Mo,
Thank you for granting me access.
I believe this would require me to force push from local repo? Wouldn't this
result
in the loss of your own commit history?
Or we could merge the two from a different branch. But that feels like too much
work :p
If you feel it is worth it to p
> [...]
>
> The first time `debian/rules clean` runs, dh_autoreconf has not run, so
> dh_autoreconf_clean has nothing to do and is silent. The second time,
> after dh_autoreconf has run, you can see it doing stuff.
ok, in that case it would be nice to display a message saying I do nothing :),
On 2024-04-19, at 14:27:40 +0200, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In this build, I do not see a call to dh_autoreconf_clean
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hkl&arch=amd64&ver=5.0.0.3434-1&stamp=1713518550&raw=0
>
> this package override_dh_clean like this
>
> over
On 19/04/2024 13:27, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
Hello,
In this build, I do not see a call to dh_autoreconf_clean
snip
so my question is: is it normal or a bug in dh-autoreconf ?
thanks for your help
Frederic
Checked one of my packages that uses autoreconf and is building OK.
There is
- Le 19 Avr 24, à 15:11, Gianfranco Costamagna locutusofb...@debian.org a
écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Instead, I see it on the very same file :)
where ???, I am looking for dh_autoreconf_clean
cheers
>
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
> debian/rules clean
> dh clean --with=
Hello,
In this build, I do not see a call to dh_autoreconf_clean
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hkl&arch=amd64&ver=5.0.0.3434-1&stamp=1713518550&raw=0
this package override_dh_clean like this
override_dh_clean:
rm -f Documentation/api/hkl-docs.sgml
dh_clean
so m
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "winff":
* Package name : winff
Version : 1.6.4+dfsg-1
Upstream contact : Matthew Weatherford
* URL : https://github.com/WinFF/winff
* License : GF
Hello,
On Thu 18 Apr 2024 at 06:24pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>>
>> Hello Xiyue,
>>
>> Please explain the autopkgtest_keep change. Remember that autopkgtests
>> are to test the installed package. If you need to keep the .el files,
>> it must
12 matches
Mail list logo
