Dne 06.05.2024 (pon) ob 15:02 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a):
>
> Hmm. I'm not sure I like the idea of abusing libexec in this
> way. Technically speaking it's for "internal binaries that are not intended
> to be executed directly by users or shell scripts" this is clearly not the
> case here.
Hi Tobias,
Tobias Frost writes:
> Hi Xiyue,
>
> when packaging a git snapshot, I feel this should be indicated in the
> upstream version that it is based on the old one, something like
> +
>
> In your case I'd 20210802+git20231023 as upstream version.
>
> Long time ago I did something like that
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi,
On Sat, 11 May 2024 10:24:31 +0200
Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:39:58AM +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 1067525
> >
> > this fix need to go to unstable because elogind 255.4.1 is already
> > there, but runit-services depends on
Hi Tobias, hi Lorenzo.
Tobias, thanks for looking into this sponsoring request! I appreciate it.
Tobias Frost - 11.05.24, 10:24:31 CEST:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:39:58AM +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 1067525
> >
> > this fix need to go to unstable because elogind 255.4.1 is
Your message dated Sat, 11 May 2024 11:04:17 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1068529: RFS: qabc/1.11-1 -- minimal GUI for ABC music
notation
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068529,
regarding RFS: qabc/1.11-1 -- minimal GUI for ABC music notation
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi Xiyue,
when packaging a git snapshot, I feel this should be indicated in the
upstream version that it is based on the old one, something like
+
In your case I'd 20210802+git20231023 as upstream version.
Long time ago I did something like that for dhewm3, you
can see the watch file here:
http
Control: reopen -1
Control: forcemerge 1069696 -1
Hi Chen,
In future, please do not file new RFS bugs, instead modify the existing
one until a package has been sponsored.
(forcemerge: FTR, the new one is #1069696, let that one be the leading one)
--
tobi
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 06:53:58PM +0
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:39:58AM +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1067525
>
> this fix need to go to unstable because elogind 255.4.1 is already
> there, but runit-services depends on runit > 2.1.2-56 (unstable is at
> 2.1.2-54) so 1067525 needs to be uploaded first or together with
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Lorenzo,
the last uploads where to experimental, this one targets unstable but
that is not mentioned in the changelog, so I guess this was accidential?
--
tobi
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:30:08AM +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: norm
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Chen,
please take a look at [1] -- the page indicates a lots of problems
with your package, especially the lintian errors, warnings and
informational tags. That means your package is not yet ready to
be reviewed in depth.
Please fix those linitian erros, then remove
Your message dated Sat, 11 May 2024 09:51:34 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1070657: RFS: c-evo-dh/1.12-1 -- Empire Building Game,
C-evo Distant Horizon
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070657,
regarding RFS: c-evo-dh/1.12-1 -- Empire Building Game, C-evo Distant Horizon
to be m
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Mikhail,
Thanks for the update. There is one thing I'd like to fixed:
The qm language files needs to be recreated at build time.
As you are upstream, you can incoorporate that change upstream
(and drop the binary files from your tarball)
There is a spelling error "c
Please also announce the NMU / RFS to the package maintainer, preferable
as bug reported against it. Thanks!
On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 02:19:00PM +0200,
=?UTF-8?Q?Preu=C3=9...@buxtehude.debian.org wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1005961
>
> On 03.05.2024 23:45, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
