Bug#909949: RFS: android-platform-system-extras/8.1.0+r23-1 (experimental)

2018-10-07 Thread | Kai-Chung Yan
Hello Roger, > > The problem is you didn't mention +ds or +repack in version in d/changelog. > I guess the version need to be changed to 8.1.0+r23+ds-1 or > 8.1.0+r23+repack-1. > > Cheers, > Truth to be told, almost all packages in Debian are "repacked" either by applying a different

Bug#909949: RFS: android-platform-system-extras/8.1.0+r23-1 (experimental)

2018-10-02 Thread | Kai-Chung Yan
Thanks for the sponsor again, Roger! I did push the changes already, check . Or do you mean you want a dedicated merge request so you can leave comments their so that in a more

Bug#909949: RFS: android-platform-system-extras/8.1.0+r23-1 (experimental)

2018-09-30 Thread | Kai-Chung Yan
replacing the obsolete android-tools-fsutils [ Kai-Chung Yan ] * Debhelper level => 11 * d/rules: Use dh-auto-build instead of plain make thanks to Helmut Grohne * Fix the conflicting types errors (Closes: #892170) * Standards-Version => 4.2.1 Regards, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan signature

Bug#909305: RFS: android-platform-system-core/1:8.1.0+r23-1~stage1.1

2018-09-25 Thread | Kai-Chung Yan
> Yes, but for case of ~stageX in version, you need to just change 1 > byte or 2 to comfort lintian. > Why not? Maybe a new versioning scheme would be better, for example, "1:8.1.0+r23-1~stage1+revision1". The current one is indeed not ideal. > This time seems OK for mips* > - >

Bug#909305: RFS: android-platform-system-core/1:8.1.0+r23-1~stage1.1

2018-09-22 Thread | Kai-Chung Yan
Hello Roger, > -1~stageX means preparing version -1. Well, it means preparing a version that is earlier than -1. > Hope you can address some lintian on next upload: > - > http://debomatic-armel.debian.net/distribution#experimental/android-platform-system-core/8.1.0+r23-1~stage1.1/lintian Most

Bug#909305: RFS: android-platform-system-core/1:8.1.0+r23-1~stage1.1

2018-09-21 Thread | Kai-Chung Yan
Hello Roger! > I just quickly checked the version on salsa, and find d/changelog is > not uploaded yet. I was planning to push the changes to Salsa after it gets uploaded. I just did it a while ago. > So could you change the version to 1:8.1.0+r23-1~stage2 ? No, we will stick with this

Bug#909305: RFS: android-platform-system-core/1:8.1.0+r23-1~stage1.1

2018-09-21 Thread | Kai-Chung Yan
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "android-platform-system-core" * Package name: android-platform-system-core Version : 1:8.1.0+r23-1~stage1.1 Upstream Author : Android Open Source Project * URL :

Bug#906134: RFS

2018-09-21 Thread | Kai-Chung Yan
Hello Jason, I am not a DD, but this thread might seem inappropriate to appear as a "sponsorship-requests" bug. How about posting it to debian-mentors [1] and then closing this bug? [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: FTBFS: how to test fixes

2016-09-13 Thread
chitectures i don't have > testmachines of? > > cheers, > -- > muri > -- /* * 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan * 一生只向真理與妻子低頭 * Undergraduate student in National Taichung University of Education * LinkedIn: <https://linkedin.com/in/seamlik> * Blog: <http://seamlik.logdown.com> */

Bug#819188: RFS: icu4j/57.1-1

2016-04-15 Thread
I believe this issue is due to . According to the buildlog it was using ant_1.9.7-1 which contained that bug. The new revision 1.9.7-2 is uploaded, hope it works. And I believe IBM's copyright has been covered by the first section in d/copyright? ``` Files: *

Bug#819188: RFS: icu4j/57.1-1

2016-04-15 Thread
Hi Gianfranco, I've added sections for Google and Unicode Inc. to d/copyright and uploaded it to mentors.debian.net. Could you please take a look again? Thank you! Since this package is maintained by pkg-java team, I don't know if it is appropriate to file this RFS outside of the team. If you

Re: Please help creating shared *and* static library with cmake

2016-04-08 Thread
doing to much tricky things. > > Besides this I'm wondering how I could get rid of the gtest code > copy and run the test anyway. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/libsdsl.git > > -- > http://fam-tille.de >

Bug#819188: RFS: icu4j/57.1-1

2016-03-25 Thread
There are Google stuff? Could you point me to the files? Thanks!

Bug#819188: RFS: icu4j/57.1-1

2016-03-24 Thread
Control: block -1 by 819192 819193

Bug#819188: RFS: icu4j/57.1-1

2016-03-24 Thread
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "icu4j" * Package name: icu4j Version : 57.1-1 Upstream Author : IBM * URL : http://www.icu-project.org * License

Bug#817863: RFS: android-platform-system-core/1:6.0.1+r16-3

2016-03-10 Thread
from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * Fix package name typo: android-{zipfile=>libzipfile}(-dev) Regards, Kai-Chung Yan -- /* * 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan * 一生只向真理與妻子低頭 * Undergraduate student in National Taichung University of Education * LinkedIn: <http

Bug#794522: RFS: safe-iop/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- Safe integer operations library

2015-08-03 Thread
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist * Package name: safe-iop Version: 0.3.1-1 * URL: http://code.google.com/p/safe-iop * License: public-domain Section: libs Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my new package safe-iop, which builds those binary packages: * libsafe-iop0