n version x.y"
mail. If you close one, you leave one of the submitters having to poll
the BTS to see if it's fixed, or to learn about bug subscription
(which, if he managed to submit a duplicate bug report in the first
place, is quite unlikely to happen).
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Si
veral keys for "Daniel Widenfalk",
but the e-mail address do not match yours, and they seem standard 1024
bit DSA keys.
Perhaps if you post your keyid somebody can take a look and tell you
whether it's fine or not?
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: dato (at) the-barrel.org | P
/Replaces cannot help. If
there's a epoch and you remove it, users should somehow be informed
that they should force the downgrade by hand.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debi
build when all buildds have g++_4.0.2-5 installed. But you may as well
proceed: it really seems it builds fine with -4 and the patch applied.
(Odd.)
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/tmp/2006-01-12/who-uploads)
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
If there is a sin against life, it consists p
eem to be prone to depend on a plethora
> of packages they don't really need for functioning due to the admin/
> subdir as shipped by kdevelop, so relibtoolizing can save a great deal
> here.
Are these instructions in a form suitable to make them public?
s around within the
> source, and doing so with a pure patch system will result in huge and
> fragile diff files (two copies of each file to be moved, which breaks if
> upstream changes any of them!).
No, in quilt patches are patches, not scripts. :) Why don't you move
files
* Adeodato Simó [Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:08:52 +0100]:
> With respect to speed,
(Er, sorry; this paragraph refers to dpatch, which isn't immediately
clear.)
> it must be that most people use it in small
> trees,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at
reading of the manpage, this will keep debug symbols, and ship
them in the _same_ package. I think what you want is:
% echo 5 >debian/compat
% dh_strip --dbg-package=foo-dbg
HTH,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
t), you should
investigate what the right order of the arguments to touch is. For
this, running `make -d` and seeing why things are getting regenerated
helps.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
nslations
themselves, don't they?). This would mean repackaging, though.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Lighthouse Family - Let
* Zak B. Elep [Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:24:14 +0800]:
> Hi Adeodato! :)
Hi!
> On 1/31/06, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then, if you insist on using touch-fu (I myself prefer it), you should
> > investigate what the right order of the arguments to touch i
z
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Alejandro Sanz - Cuando nadie me ve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &
build-indep:
if [ -x /usr/bin/foo ] && [ -x /usr/bin/bar ]; then \
foo; \
bar; \
fi
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
A conclusion is
endencies (like "Depends:" instead of "Suggests:") in the
> future either there may well be situations where the documentation package
> could have another version than the main package.
If you care much about this, you could make the Suggests versioned;
not t
ion number (or is there anything else to do
> this)?
Bump. You can only use the same one if it's been rejected, afaik.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Any life, no ma
map soname to package name (a simple regex, I
think). I believe Steve Kowalik plans on removing this check.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Acaba de...
Acaba de una ve
tainer
to rename. If you don't get to an agreement, you both rename. This
procedure is described in the first paragraph of Policy §10.1.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.
om the ftpmaster team,
the attached patch should be enough to fix RC Bug#368857
HTH,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Amon
ing it without debhelper installed outside the pbuilder. ;-)
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
When all is summed up, a man never speaks of himself without loss; his
accusatio
table release
> 5. something else...
Option (3) is the way to go if you think you're know what are doing and
others don't disagree. ;-)
It can get messy if further bugs are discovered by users, though, but
chances are slimmer if the maintainer is a regulgar user of the pac
s to do the same.
> But like I said, I thought there was a process regarding adoption.
Confirmed. And thanks for bringing this to our attention in such a
polite manner.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
quilt.
> at all costs I try to avoid this, because it makes hard to drop
> specific patch if upstream accepts the patched feature.
Uh? In the case above, you have no problems if upstream accepts either
change1 or change2.
--
Adeodato Simó da
nce #340871 is
fixed.
Only, in case they provide a workaround for the bug (eg., "build with
-O0 instead of -O2"), you may consider applying it for m68k only.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
to file a wishlist bug.)
But this is normally for debugging problems, and for uploads, the
non-free buildd network, or porter uploads (#1), are preferred.
> I have found the pages on porting and using the -B option in
> dpkg-buildpackage but then is it OK to just u
ly that it's not a *true* staging area,
> since I can't promote a package that's byte-for-byte the same.
Right, not byte for byte, since an extra changelog entry is needed (*).
Who said it was an staging area, anyway? It's an extra distribution,
just an incomplete one.
uld
^
^
^
and one depends on the other with (= ${Source-Version}) --|
> symlink the /usr/share/doc/libpac-dev to the /usr/share/doc/libpac.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer ad
y of the changelog
> with each binary package isn't large.
I should also mention that the main benefit I see from linking the doc
directories is not space savings, but making it easier for users to
access documentation: whichever directory they enter, it's all there.
Cheers,
--
Ad
* Joshua D. Abraham [Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:53:37 -0400]:
> he has requested that someone review it first.
Out of interest, why?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
One of my m
* Carlos Galisteo [Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:32:50 +0200]:
> Jonathan McDowell (previous mantainer)
(JFTR, Joe Wreschnig.)
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
The reasonable man ada
SKIP_TEST_CPUS := arm m68k s390
test:
ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU),$(SKIP_TEST_CPUS)))
test
else
@echo "Slow-cpu arch detected, skipping test"
endif
-----8<--
Cheers,
--
s.sf.net project may add in the future).
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car
payments.
* David Paleino [Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:22:12 +0200]:
> Adeodato Simó ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> Hi,
(Please reply to the list.)
> > Please create a single source/binary package ed2k-tools that contains
> > both ed2k-shutdown and ed2k-hash (and any other utilities that t
* Charles Plessy [Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:18:30 +0900]:
> About debian/rules:
> - The configure rule is mandatory
I've never heard such a thing, where does this affirmation come from?
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debia
nd UIDs can't be removed, only revoked.
Unless your key has not been uploaded to a public keyserver, you can't
get rid of the comment by any other means than making a new key. If it
hasn't been uploaded to a public keyserver, you can remove the UID.
HTH,
--
Adeodato Simó
I don't know if this means a public server.
I don't know what mentors.debian.net does (eg. if they store the key,
etc.), but FYI a search for "Gudjonsson" on a couple of public servers
does not yield any results matching your name.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
itory: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> main contrib non-free
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lastfm/lastfm_1:1.1.3.0-1.dsc
^^
I've seen stanzas like this in most RFS. Are they autogenerat
unnecessary, since needed
directories are created by dh_install.
HTH, cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Te has enfadado conmigo / porque te dejo / Es injusto
No quieres volver
* John Stamp [Wed, 02 May 2007 08:50:03 -0700]:
> When -2 is ready should I upload to mentors and ping you? Or would
> you prefer something different?
Yeah, pinging me is fine.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Dev
#x27;re sure all affected maintainers read the list, what you
did is ok. If not, custom practice is to CC them, just in case.
Good job!
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
- I&#x
ckages; only, not in the normal Debian
repositories because (I assume) they're not regarded as useful for
non-debian.org machines. They're publicly available as well, albeit in a
sort of hidden repository.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.o
contacting the Ubuntu maintainer
about maintaining only one package for both distributions still apply.
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2007/05/msg00281.html
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
De
Tarrío for confirming that my ideas about this
were correct.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Dijkstra
kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko
^
^
^
You are giving a wrong package name. It should be '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@', not
fuse-modules.
HTH,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at
rsion} substvar to
> ${binary:Version}
Just for the record, these two were fixed in the Bazaar branch a week ago:
http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-xiph/libvorbis
> +It also makes the package binNMU'able.
This is not true, it already was.
)
--
Adeodato Simó
> http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-xiph/libvorbis
> I get a blank page with just a link to the parent package.
It's a Bazaar branch, so you have to retrieve it with:
% bzr get http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-xiph/libvorbis
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
get different revisions as to work easily with them, but
there are no lost debian revisions, which would seem undesirable for me.
HTH,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
that is not possible.
HTH, good luck.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Lhasa - Abro la ventana
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
lenny | 515 | 1393
---|---|
sid | 598 | 1505
I believe it's very appropriate to at least mention quilt in the new
maintainer guide.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
ovides a XML implementation, in this case
/usr/lib/python2.4/xml/parsers/expat.py.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first plac
needed debian/docs and debian/menu, and debian/*.ex
* update debian/compat to 5
* change " Home Page" in debian/control to " Homepage"
It would've been good to mention in debian/changelog the addition of
XS-Vcs-Svn to debian/control. No need to modify the changelog
your init.d script from some template that advocates
returning directly the exit status of start-stop-daemon without
--oknodo, that template needs fixing.
HTH,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeo
* LI Daobing [Wed, 10 Oct 2007 06:36:15 +0800]:
> Dear mentors,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.4.0-6
> of my package "qterm".
Package looks good, I uploaded it. Sorry for the delay.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dat
owed field must be first introduced by a version
uploaded by a DD. That is, you'll need 0.99+dfsg-1 sponsored, and
then you'll be able to upload regularly. Make sure you use
XS-DM-Upload-Allowed in debian/control, and not just DM-Upload-Allowed.
HTH,
--
Adeodato Simó
you're correct. (Hint: you don't sign with UIDs, so
dak could not care less about what the primary UID is.)
Have a nice day,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
* Asheesh Laroia [Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:07:25 -0800]:
> Where is XS-DM-Upload-Allowed documented? I only see DM-Upload-Allowed
> documented at http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003 .
If you have a look at #453400 and Policy 5.7, and you should get the
picture. :)
Cheers,
--
Adeodat
Your message is encrypted, please don't send encrypted mail to mailing
lists. :-)
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
A conclusion is simply the place where someone got tir
a meta-package has been put in place,
after determining that there was no ABI breakage on mipsen.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Russian roulette in bash: ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -r
-mpich-dev or
> libhdf5-openmpi-dev. Is it still possible to build package
> meep-mpi-hdf5serial,
> meep-mpi-hdf5mpich and meep-mpi-hdf5openmpi at the same time?
If the different implementations conflict among them, I don't think you
can build all three SL{1,2,3} binary packages f
pache2 packages.
> However, the build mechanism has to be a bit complicated...
Care to ellaborate? I don't think in that case the build-dependencies
conflict, OR they are built from the same source package.
--
Adeodato Simó dato
7;ll find
> some time to consider it and make the right decision.
I think packaging involves some similar decicions, in particular one
should try to avoid packaging crap. As for non Unix-y stuff, it should
be up to packages who care, IMHO. :-)
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Sim
d pull in type-handling on all !i386 arches. There
is no point at all in doing that for Recommends, though: you want psyco
just not installed, not random crap pulled in. :-)
HTH,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
so I'd urge you not to let
yourself get demotivated because of it. For extra points, you can ask
other DDs you already know for their opinion, and work with that.
Good luck,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
after lenny is
> released when such bugs are found? (It makes the package mostly unusable). Is
> there a relevant how to? I've looked in maintainer's guide and in developer's
> reference but I didn't find anything related.
Packages stay in unstable by
* Stefanos Harhalakis [Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:51:28 +0200]:
> On Saturday 08 November 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > In my opinion, you should just invoke the configure script with the
> > paths of all programs as they are found in Debian, eg.:
> > % ./configure --wit
parts (subkeys) are equally valid
than if they'd be done with the main key.
It is true that AFAIK you won't be able to put more than key in the
Debian keyring, should you become a DD or a DM.
HTH,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.
* Andreas Tscharner [Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:31:42 +0100]:
> If I execute the .config file, the expected screen (it's a note) is shown
Hm, I thought you're not supposed to use debconf to display notes, and
that NEWS.Debian is preferred.
--
Adeodato Simó
bmsn0.1', 'libmsn0.2', etc packages in the near
> future.
In that case, maybe you should only package the static library until the
ABI stabilizes.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeo
* Pau Garcia i Quiles [Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:39:45 +0100]:
> Should I rename the directory in the .orig.tar and make
> tamper-checking more difficult, or not rename the directory in the
> .orig.tar and make tamper-checking easier?
You should not, dpkg-source copes well enough.
--
Adeo
* gregor herrmann [Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:15:07 +0100]:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:01:30 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > Should I rename the directory in the .orig.tar and make
> > > tamper-checking more difficult, or not rename the directory in the
> > > .orig.tar a
evel directory, period. No matter if what doesn't match is the
version part, the name part, or both.
Said that, your source package name should still be "libmsn" even if the
binary package is named "libmsn0.1", bacause when you bump the binary
package to "lib
* Michal Čihař [Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:56:47 +0100]:
> - Vcs-Bzr: lp:libmetalink ... is this standard way of specifying bzr
> repositories?
It is Launchpad-specific but, alas, the launchpad plugin is included in
bzr core, so anybody who does `bzr branch lp:libmetalink`, it will work.
--
Ad
uren A. Chilingaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net/
> * License : GPL
> Section : libs
Hello ivan. Please remove me from the Uploaders field of this package, I
keep receiving mail about uploads to
, so you need not
mail -release this one time.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Javier Álvarez - Septiembre
--
To UNSUBSCR
* Arnaud Fontaine [Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:09:46 +0100]:
> You could get rid [...] of debian/docs as cdbs already installs the
> files listed.
«Explicit is better than implicit.» (Maybe not on -mentors, but surely on
-python. ;-)
--
Adeodato Simó d
r) as Piotr Ożarowski suggested.
So, I get that we have developers that really fancy this scheme. Okay,
we have more worrysome differences within Debian. But it would be more
okay if these developers would reckon (in their daily doings) that many
(?) of us don't agree this should be, by any
/usr/lib`, fixed
> now", or rather just fix it silently?
^^
In case there were any doubts, with "under that scenario" I
meant to imply that such botching of debian/rules had been
introduced in the current version, not in an
* Martin Meredith [Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:05:11 +]:
Hey Martin,
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * history: I haven't seen this argument fly be in (this and other
> > instances of) this discussion, but the answer is that the pro
ken)
(This is a bit off-topic on this thread, but pristine-tar is precisely
about that: giving you the extra bits needed to ensure that the
reconstructed tarball will be bit-by-bit identical to the original one.)
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
, and there are other DDs who
think different. Me, I believe having a readable diff.gz is motivation
enough as to repack the tarball.)
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
ed two other changes?
Unblocked by Luk.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
I promise you. Once I enter into an exclusive relationship, I sleep with
very few people.
--
* Andreas Hoenen [Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:21:18 +0100]:
> This link might be of interest to you: http://bugs.debian.org/457345
> Looks like it will need some more time :-(
Take a look again by reloading it in your browser.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó d
the Date: line in (#60) is somewhat misleading.
Raphael's message was initially sent to debian-...@lists.debian.org, and
later bounced to the bug report.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at
* Giacomo A. Catenazzi [Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:56:20 +0100]:
> how to had new services in /etc/services database?
By filing a bug like #353835 (against netbase).
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.o
I’d recommend approx.
> * Is it able to cope with multiple architectures?
> * Can it support multiple distributions? Supporting Debian, Ubuntu and
> other non-official repositories would be really handy.
> * Does it keep a directory hierarchy neatly organized like the Debian
> archive?
Yes,
* Jaromír Mikeš [Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:57:40 +0100]:
> Hello,
> I am not sure what to fill to "Section" in control file for my new package I
> am building.
> Program is small easy CLI utility generating sound (pink and white noise)
Section: sound sounds appropriate to me.
--
- Are you sure we'r
* Paul Wise [Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:35:44 +0900]:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > (And yes, I know about backports.d.n; maybe I'll get 'round to submitting
> > or maintaining stuff there at some point, but for the present it is
> > a bit easier for me to keep it all in a
* Jérémy Lal [Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:52:49 +0100]:
> Hi,
> is there a way to change a package dependency without rebuilding it ?
> For example, gimp2.6 depends on libwebkit-1.0.1, and i want latest
> libwebkit-1.0.2
> installed. I don't really care to break that dependency since gimp will work
> wit
* Goswin von Brederlow [Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:33:32 +0200]:
Hello, [-mentors only Bcc'ed to drop it from the discussion]
Executive summary: concerns about ia32-apt-get raised, lesser hack
proposed for comments.
> before Lenny ftpmaster asked us (ia32-libs maintainers) to do
> something about t
* Tristan Greaves [Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:53:53 +0100]:
> Hi all,
> Could someone please explain the above Excuse for me? (I understand the
> _what_ but not the _why_ in this instance).
> https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=siege
> My package has successfully built on the other architect
+ Peter Pentchev (Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:27:06 +0300):
> Hi,
Hello, Peter.
> I've been seeing this for the past two weeks:
> http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=dante
> libdsocksd0/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libc6.1.1 (>> 2.9)
> libsocksd0/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libc6.1.1 (>> 2.9)
>
+ Mikhail Gusarov (Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:42:06 +0700):
> Hi,
Hello, Mikhail.
> I've got source package (pyinotify) with 3 binary packages built from
> it: python-pyinotify, python-pyinotify-dbg and python-pyinotify-doc.
> In new upstream release author dropped the binary module (hence there is
>
+ Mikhail Gusarov (Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:59:48 +0700):
> AS> You should just stop building them, and the old versions will get
> AS> removed from the archive semi-automatically.
> Ok, I will just drop the -dbg package. Given it depends on
> python-pyinotify (= ${binary:Version}), will it be remov
+ Joachim Reichel (Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:05:21 +0200):
> I understand that libgl1-mesa-glx and libglu1-mesa are not available on
> hppa in the required versions (>= 7.4). But what is the problem on alpha?
That libglu1-mesa 7.4 became available on alpha only very recently, and
the buildd machine did
+ Laurent Léonard (Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:42:52 +0200):
> Hi,
Hello, Laurent. Thanks for your interest in writting good changelog
entries. It’s an inquietude I’d like to see more often in our
maintainers.
> Is there a standard or a recommendation for the content of the changelog
> file ?
As other
It’d be great if somebody would take a look into uploading this package,
since it’s needed for the gnome-desktop transition. Many thanks in advance!
+ Diego Fernández Durán (Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:36:17 +0200):
> Dear mentors,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.12.5-6
> of my packag
Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 15:42, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >> It’d be great if somebody would take a look into uploading this package,
> >> since it’s needed for the gnome-desktop transition. Many thanks in advance!
> >> + Diego Fernández Durán (Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:36:17 +020
+ Diego Fernández Durán (Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:28:39 +0200):
> About the cowbuilder error, I successfully compiled 2.12.5-6 package with
> pdebuild. I don't know exactly what is failing.
When you sent your initial RFS, gnome-desktop 2.26 hadn’t been uploaded
to unstable yet, that’s why succeeded.
Neil,
I am writing to let you and the list and all sponsorees who may be
reading this thread know that I don’t agree with most of what you’re
saying, and that I don’t like the tone in which you are writing your
thoughts, and that I think you are a harmful influence regarding these
matters in parti
+ Elimar Riesebieter (Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:04:15 +0200):
> Dear mentors,
Hello, Elimar. (Elimar is one of our capable ALSA maintainers, by the
way.)
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.7.0~beta20090329-1
> of my package "ripit".
> It builds these binary packages:
> ripit - Te
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
