send your messages to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This said, you should make the Debian source package available somewhere
on the net (you can use http://mentors.debian.net for instance), and
file an ITP for the package which you'll close in the debian/changelog
of your package. More rema
ase check if they are ok. Thanks!
Hello,
Are you aware of http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~gavinb/projects/itk.php ? It
looks like you are duplicating the work done by Gavin Baker.
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:55:46AM -0700, John Hendrickson wrote:
> they are all targeted to be burned like some Nazi bonfire. And I'd say
I guess this ends the discussion...
:-)
--
Alexandre Fayolle
(or anybody else) happen to
> know what kind of sponsor they are looking for? Is it something to get a
> US Visa or such?
Silly me, I should have googled before asking.
http://www.immihelp.com/visas/visitor/sponsordocs.html says it all.
Sorry for bothering everyone...
--
Alexandre Fayolle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:25:06PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Alexandre Fayolle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >The reason why I ask is that I maintain the python-psyco package, which
> >supports only i386, and the buildd logs [1] say that attempts have been
> >made to
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 02:08:48PM +0200, Keith Dunwoody wrote:
> Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> >Are ports attempted on all packages, or is the Architecture field in
> >debian/control taken into account?
> >
> >The reason why I ask is that I maintain the python-psyco pack
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 02:22:56PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 13:36, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> >
> > Are ports attempted on all packages, or is the Architecture field in
> > debian/control taken into account?
> >
> > The reason why I
event got a FTBFS bug
report. I'm not sure of how I should handle this bug, btw.
[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=psyco
--
Alexandre Fayolle
LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
Développement logiciel avancé - Intelli
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:25:06PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Alexandre Fayolle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >The reason why I ask is that I maintain the python-psyco package, which
> >supports only i386, and the buildd logs [1] say that attempts have been
> >made to
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 02:08:48PM +0200, Keith Dunwoody wrote:
> Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> >Are ports attempted on all packages, or is the Architecture field in
> >debian/control taken into account?
> >
> >The reason why I ask is that I maintain the python-psyco pack
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 02:22:56PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 13:36, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> >
> > Are ports attempted on all packages, or is the Architecture field in
> > debian/control taken into account?
> >
> > The reason why I
event got a FTBFS bug
report. I'm not sure of how I should handle this bug, btw.
[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=psyco
--
Alexandre Fayolle
LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
Développement logiciel avancé - Intelli
s shipped with the packages, don't forget to use alternatives so
that the package can be installed for several python version at the same
time.
--
Alexandre Fayolle
LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org
Développement logiciel avancé - Intelligence Artificielle - Formations
Well, this is not a question. I've just spent several hours wondering
what the matter was with a package which refused to build. rules was
failing with the following message:
dpkg-gencontrol: error: per-package paragraph 1 in control info file is
missing Package line
I searched the archive, and f
Well, this is not a question. I've just spent several hours wondering
what the matter was with a package which refused to build. rules was
failing with the following message:
dpkg-gencontrol: error: per-package paragraph 1 in control info file is
missing Package line
I searched the archive, and
15 matches
Mail list logo
