On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:47:09PM +0100, Maxime Chatelle wrote:
> * https://code.google.com/p/google-code-prettify/
> Tarball available, license Apache 2.0, Makefile to build minimized
> version, uses yui-compressor to minimize. In fact,
> poco-1.4.7-all-doc.tar.gz uses only a part of pretti
o links to that library.
If all linkings are shared, it is my understanding that the global state
of the multiple-linked library would be shared by all references.
--
Andreas Bombe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:09:17AM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> How about naming this package go-compiler ?
>
> This way, the language is not tied to Google and the fact that go is a
> computer language is implicit.
The problem with not tying it to Google is when someone decides to
package
/server-control tells you how.
--
Andreas Bombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>GPG key 0x04880A44
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that the way to do it? Or are there better ways of
> doing it?
The installer packages I used usually asked me where the downloaded
archive is or alternatively offered to download it themselves. You'd
need to interact with the admin anyway, you can't just assume something
is somewhere without at least notifying the admin that it has to be
there.
--
Andreas Bombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>DSA key 0x04880A44
d
> spamming that i now notify this list.
It's not considered spamming, it's recommended procedure. The
sponsor-request page (I'm assuming you mean
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ here) is just an
unofficial tracker of sponsorees/sponsors.
--
Andreas Bombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>DSA key 0x04880A44
Is that the way to do it? Or are there better ways of
> doing it?
The installer packages I used usually asked me where the downloaded
archive is or alternatively offered to download it themselves. You'd
need to interact with the admin anyway, you can't just assume something
is s
d
> spamming that i now notify this list.
It's not considered spamming, it's recommended procedure. The
sponsor-request page (I'm assuming you mean
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ here) is just an
unofficial tracker of sponsorees/sponsors.
--
Andreas
se
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
to indicate the license. The strings have to match exactly, according
to $linuxsrc/include/linux/modules.h there is no LGPL tag. But LGPL can
count as GPL when linked with GPL code.
--
Andreas Bombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>DSA key 0x04880A44
se
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
to indicate the license. The strings have to match exactly, according
to $linuxsrc/include/linux/modules.h there is no LGPL tag. But LGPL can
count as GPL when linked with GPL code.
--
Andreas Bombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>DSA key 0x04880A44
--
To U
rrect binary (telling the user what package to install if no
matching binary can be found). Voilà, CPU independent installation.
--
Andreas Bombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>DSA key 0x04880A44
rrect binary (telling the user what package to install if no
matching binary can be found). Voilà, CPU independent installation.
--
Andreas Bombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>DSA key 0x04880A44
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 08:29:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:41:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> > is what appears on that page.
>
> I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hour
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 08:29:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:41:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> > is what appears on that page.
>
> I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hou
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:20:33AM +0200, David Spreen wrote:
> Hey there,
> I maintain the lids packages for the debian distribution and I am working on
> a lids-configurationtool so this becomes more easy to manage for users.
> What I want to know is, is it allowed to have a configtool, which mo
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:22:35PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Fidoconf is a central library in this Project, its the one used for the
> Config. Every Programm calls Fidoconf to get his configuration. All
> Configuration is done in one file (most of the time, 90%).
>
> So, my Problem:
> a.) One
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:20:33AM +0200, David Spreen wrote:
> Hey there,
> I maintain the lids packages for the debian distribution and I am working on
> a lids-configurationtool so this becomes more easy to manage for users.
> What I want to know is, is it allowed to have a configtool, which m
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:22:35PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Fidoconf is a central library in this Project, its the one used for the
> Config. Every Programm calls Fidoconf to get his configuration. All
> Configuration is done in one file (most of the time, 90%).
>
> So, my Problem:
> a.) One
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 09:59:08AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, for starters, he said the software is "an official GNU project",
> > not something written specifically for Debian.
>
> "Debian native", does, in my definition, not imply
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 09:59:08AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, for starters, he said the software is "an official GNU project",
> > not something written specifically for Debian.
>
> "Debian native", does, in my definition, not impl
20 matches
Mail list logo
