passing from unstable to testing

Hi As http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html says for kannel: kannel 1.1.5-2 (currently 1.0-1) (optional) (non-US) (low) Maintainer: Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kannel uploaded 11 days ago, out of date by 1 days! kannel/s390: Unsatisfiable Depends: l

passing from unstable to testing

Hi As http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html says for kannel: kannel 1.1.5-2 (currently 1.0-1) (optional) (non-US) (low) Maintainer: Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kannel uploaded 11 days ago, out of date by 1 days! kannel/s390: Unsatisfiable Depends: l

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

Hi El 13 Sep 2001 a las 04:47PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson escribio: > Quoting Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13 Sep-01 14:46]: > > I can't realize why some people is proccesed before other, that is, why > > somebody overtakes others? > > The delay for s

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

Hi El 13 Sep 2001 a las 04:47PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson escribio: > Quoting Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13 Sep-01 14:46]: > > I can't realize why some people is proccesed before other, that is, why > > somebody overtakes others? > > The delay fo

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

es importante. http://www.kriptopolis.com/26525278.html Andres Seco Hernandez- [EMAIL PROTECTED] MCP ID 445900 - http://andressh.alamin.org GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/3A48C934 E61C 08A9 EBC8 12E4 F363 E359 EDAC BE0B 3A48 C934 -- Al

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

es importante. http://www.kriptopolis.com/26525278.html Andres Seco Hernandez- [EMAIL PROTECTED] MCP ID 445900 - http://andressh.alamin.org GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/3A48C934 E61C 08A9 EBC8 12E4 F363 E359 EDAC BE0B 3A48 C934 -- Al

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

today (2001-09-13). Ludovic Drolez AM recomends to DAM on 2001-08-20 account created on 2001-08-22 El 13 Sep 2001 a las 01:31PM +0200, Andres Seco Hernandez escribio: > Hi > > I have seen some new applicants status, and some > applicants have been recommended to DAM before others b

new maintainers DAM approval time

). Ludovic Drolez AM recomends to DAM on 2001-08-20 account created on 2001-08-22 I can't realize why some people is proccesed before other, that is, why somebody overtakes others? Thanks a lot. -- Andres Seco Hernandez- [EMAIL PROTECTED] MCP ID 445900 - http://andressh.alami

Re: new maintainers DAM approval time

today (2001-09-13). Ludovic Drolez AM recomends to DAM on 2001-08-20 account created on 2001-08-22 El 13 Sep 2001 a las 01:31PM +0200, Andres Seco Hernandez escribio: > Hi > > I have seen some new applicants status, and some > applicants have been recommended to DAM before others b

new maintainers DAM approval time

). Ludovic Drolez AM recomends to DAM on 2001-08-20 account created on 2001-08-22 I can't realize why some people is proccesed before other, that is, why somebody overtakes others? Thanks a lot. -- Andres Seco Hernandez- [EMAIL PROTECTED] MCP ID 445900 - http://andressh.alami

how long a package must be in unstable without critical bugs to be copied to testing?

ante el Senado acerca de la LSSI, es importante. http://www.kriptopolis.com/26525278.html Andres Seco Hernandez- [EMAIL PROTECTED] MCP ID 445900 - http://andressh.alamin.org GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/3A48C934 E61C 08A9 EBC8 12E4 F363 E359 EDAC BE0B 3A48 C934

how long a package must be in unstable without critical bugs to be copied to testing?

ante el Senado acerca de la LSSI, es importante. http://www.kriptopolis.com/26525278.html Andres Seco Hernandez- [EMAIL PROTECTED] MCP ID 445900 - http://andressh.alamin.org GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/3A48C934 E61C 08A9 EBC8 12E4 F363 E359 EDAC BE0B 3A48 C934