s? It seems readers of debian-cloud@lists.d.o may be
interested in the package. But, sure, I don't want to bother people
too much.
Thanks.
--
Best regards, Andrii Senkovych
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Jakub, thank you for a review, answers inline
>> .orig.tar.gz is not bitwise-identical to the one uscan downloads. Why?
It seems git-buildpackage has repacked the tarball, I've done new
upload with the correct orig tarball.
>> Current standards version is 3.9.6. (But beware that Lintian doesn't k
Dear mentors, python hackers, Debian developers
I'm maintaining buildbot[1] packages for quite some time. While
current packaging of this application is not that hard, the upcoming
0.9 release includes a new web interface organized as python module
called 'buildbot_www'. This module is in fact an
ndrii Senkovych
2013/3/18 Niels Thykier :
> On 2013-03-18 18:15, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:17:01PM +0200, Andrii Senkovych wrote:
>>> Hello, debian-mentors
>>>
>>> I'm sorry in advance if this is the wrong list to ask.
>>>
&g
different checksums. I have tried all sorts of dpkg-buildpackage flags
with no success. After all these efforts I decided to ask you.
So, the question is: how should I build packages for multiple
architectures without such problems?
Thank you.
--
Best regards,
Andrii Senkovych
--
To UNS
5 matches
Mail list logo