On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 16:04 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:46 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:09:39AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I agree, I don't think it makes much sense to build these OOT if
On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 13:23 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Hi Ben!
> Could you please chime in to bug #901134 (RFS: anbox-modules)?
>
> This package wants to ship redundant copies of two modules (ashmem and
> binder) that are already in mainline since a long time ago. This strikes me
> as
does support.
>
> That means nothing higher than SSE2 on amd64, and no SSE at all on i386.
[...]
On i386 we cannot even assume MMX, as the earliest 686 models don't
have it.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.
signatu
,
though that is not yet an official service)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
this in a package uploaded to Debian.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 00:01 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
[...]
I think there's a good case for
including it in the 'laptop' task, but not in the standard system
(desktops and servers generally don't need
.
--
Ben Hutchings
Q. Which is the greater problem in the world today, ignorance or apathy?
A. I don't know and I couldn't care less.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is enough, so long as the
referenced file really is included. I would recommend to upstream that
they include a copyright statement (year and owner) in each file, though.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by stupidity.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 14:20 +0100, Dominik Smatana wrote:
Hello,
there are missing licenses in some source files in upstream project
I'm packaging for Debian.
There is just license in the main source file.
Is it fine?
Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (copy paste
not be passing untrusted
strings to it, so it doesn't allow compromising an ordinary user
account. So, not a security flaw so far as I can see. But it obviously
ought to be fixed.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Usenet is essentially a HUGE group of people passing notes in class.
- Rachel
if you have the original source unpacked in the directory
$name-$version.orig and the Debian-modified source in the directory
$name-$version then dpkg-source -b $name-$version will use
$name-$version.orig to build the orig.tar.gz.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame
to form a pipeline if not.
snip
It doesn't. The pipeline would be:
tar cf - $source_dir | gzip -c9 $tarball
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
in the Debian package.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
could have a template postinst file and then (1) in the command for
the binary target make copies of that with substitutions (perhaps
using sed), and (2) in the commands for the clean target delete the
substituted version. Make sure to comment what you're doing.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Q. Which
://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.html
How is the dpkg v2 archive format activated during the packaging process?
So far as I know, there are no tools for making dpkg source v2 (aka
Wig and Pen) packages yet, though dpkg-source can unpack them.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
can upload
to unstable and then prevent it from moving into testing by
immediately filing a bug on with severity serious simply saying that
it is not ready for release.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] shortened to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you've signed my GPG key, please send a signature
or sbuild after inspecting, but would prefer you
to test beforehand.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] shortened to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you've signed my GPG key, please send a signature on and to the new uid.
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious
/machines.cgi?host=sarti is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Albert Einstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
).
Each of the scripts should have a manual page, but not the kernel
modules.
Have you read http://wiki.debian.org/KernelModulesPackaging yet?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking
of its files under /opt/$vendor. I
don't know what I would do about including its binaries in the path
though.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
+2.4.4rc1.
I believe this practice has been obsolete since the release of sarge.
dpkg now considers ~ to sort before anything, even a null string, so
you can use e.g. 1.0.0~rc5.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
signature.asc
Description
.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Life would be so much easier if we could look at the source code.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
near the
end. It might be worth a look.
--
Ben Hutchings
All extremists should be taken out and shot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
distributions, so far as I know.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Always try to do things in chronological order;
it's less confusing that way.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joel Johnson wrote:
On Thu, September 22, 2005 10:38 am, Ben Hutchings wrote:
snip
A new rule was added to dpkg version comparisons a while ago to
support this case. A ~ compares as less than anything else, even the
empty string, so 1.1~rc1 is greater than 1.0 and less than 1.1
://changelogs.debian.net/ here ?
I rather think this should be http://snapshot.debian.net.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I'm not a reverse psychological virus. Please don't copy me into your sig.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in this case, I
guess?), so that all new changelog entries are included in .changes.
(I didn't know about this till tbm pointed it out to me.)
--
Ben Hutchings
If the facts do not conform to your theory, they must be disposed of.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
games
Source and i386 binary packages can be found at
http://womble.decadentplace.org.uk/software/.
(Note: linda complains Build-Depends on debhelper unnecessarily. even
though debian/rules does use debhelper; I don't understand why.)
--
Ben Hutchings
The program is absolutely right; therefore
28 matches
Mail list logo
