Hi,
> I've been following a bit of a breadcrumb trail, and I hope I'm in the right
> place now. kcollectd, a tool for viewing log information, has recently been
> removed from unstable because it lacked a Qt 5 port [1]. I have ported that
> package and I've taken over the upstream (which has been
Hi,
> if also possible upload this one. It removes a obsolete dependency
> git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-xmpp/jabber-muc.git
Let's see:
-Recommends: jabberd14 | jabberd2
+Recommends: jabberd2
I do not think that such small change requires upload.
Small note: I have fixed tiny typo in debian/copy
Package: jabberd2
Version: 2.2.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Hi,
> Is someone willing to upload the new version of the package?
> It close a bug.
> The package is here: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-xmpp/jabberd2.git
At first you
>> Also it would be a good idea to provide git repo for the package somewhere.
>> For example, at collab-maint on Alioth.
>
> ok, thanks. I'll put it into a bzr repo once i've adopted it.
You did not catch an idea. I have in mind that some DDs prefer to browse
package changes at VCS repo. (For exa
Hi,
> Could someone please sponsor xsane for me? It's on of the most popular SANE
> frontends, and has been near unmaintained recently.
You may open RFS bug-report for sponsorship-requests pseudo-package [1].
You have received a link to RFS template in email from mentors.debian.net.
[1] https://
Hi,
> Yes but then lintian will bork "patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff"
> because of .pc presence, and the .pc directory will be packed into the source
> package. Or should I delete .pc directory before running debuild ?
Maybe .git/info/exclude file is what are you looking for.
Best wishe
Hi Felix,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "svxlink"
> ...
> It builds these binary packages:
>
> qtel - Graphical client for the EchoLink® protocol
> qtel-dbg - Graphical client for the EchoLink® protocol (debug symbols)
> remotetrx - Remote controller for radio transceivers
>
>> There is new lintian error tags now:
>> E: open-axiom-databases:
>> copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl
>> (And the same for other packages.)
>>
>> Fix should be simple:
>> http://paste.debian.net/plain/70930
>> (But I have not checked it.)
> Fixed and checked! :-
Hi Igor,
> I've updated Git [1] and uploaded sources to mentors [2]
>
> [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-open-axiom/pkg-open-axiom.git
> [2] https://mentors.debian.net/package/open-axiom
There is new lintian error tags now:
E: open-axiom-databases: copyright-should-refer-to-common-lice
Hi,
>> Some files in the source tree are licensed under GPL-2+ and Expat licenses.
>>
>> But I have checked only [1] output. Please have in mind that it includes not
>> full info and all blocks with "Copyright: *No copyright*" and
>> "License: UNKNOWN" should be checked manually.
>>
>> [1] li
Hi,
No need to Cc me: I am subscribed to d-m mailing list.
> While Alioth is down, there are
> http://cgit.osdyson.org/open-axiom.git/
> and
> https://github.com/ip1981/open-axiom-debian
Great! This helps.
Let's see.
$ uscan --report
Processing watchfile line for package open-axiom...
Newest v
Hi Igor,
This is not a full review, but just few quick notes.
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-axiom"
Have you thought about maintaining this package under umbrella of Debian
Science Team [1][2]? Package looks completely suitable for it.
I am not aware if this was already dis
>>> I still don't think it's a problem of qgit (or any other package providing
>>> this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview).
>> Still? I don't see your opinion in bug report. Please send your comment
>> there.
>> And do not forget to Cc the submitter: he will be able to write other
>> argu
Hi,
>> How about bug report #641745? It looks easy fixable.
>
> I still don't think it's a problem of qgit (or any other package providing
> this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview).
Still? I don't see your opinion in bug report. Please send your comment there.
And do not forget to Cc the sub
Hi Andrey,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qgit"
> ...
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * Fix the binary installaton path with recent Qt (Closes: #724814)
> * Drop stgit from Recommends
> * Use canonical paths in Vcs-* fields
Your patch looks fine. I may upload your package.
How
Hi,
> Now I moved it to the correct location.
>
> $mv hallo.mo ~/tmp/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES
>
> The problem now is that I can only run it in english!
$ env | grep LANG
$ env | grep LC_
And search in google (or etc.) these environmental variables.
> How can I see it in the original form?
Try som
Hi Kevin,
>>> The package was not yet uploaded into Debian.
>>> - The package number should be 0.9.13-1
>>
>> Could I still keep the incrementation, because the earlier versions
>> are already tagged & signed in the public git repository and also
>> already uploaded to a Ubuntu PPA? (ppa:bort
Hi Thomas,
> I am looking for a solution to fix the following bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707754
>
> A package I maintain contains a configuration header (vpConfig.h)
> which differ depending on the architecture we are (here the dependencies are
> not the same on i386 a
>>> Should I produce 2 different source packages
>>> for main and contrib from the same upstream project?
>>
>> Short answer:
>> Yes, this is the best solution in such case.
>> (If there is no any possibility to avoid non-free dependencies.)
>
> That's only if they're _build_ dependencies. Ru
Hi Nicolas,
> Should I produce 2 different source packages
> for main and contrib from the same upstream project?
Short answer:
Yes, this is the best solution in such case.
(If there is no any possibility to avoid non-free dependencies.)
Some additional thoughts:
If tarball is quite small, you
Hi,
> 1. repackaging the orig.tar.gz without src/host/lua-5.1.4, adding
>a suffix to the version e.g. +dfsg1 (so we end up with
>premake4_4.3+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz)
A suffix +dfsg is used in another meaning. Maybe use +ds or +repack instead?
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Adrian,
Thanks again for your interest.
> do you need a sponsor for lightspeed?
Yes, I need a sponsor for this package, see my RFS (#679439).
I thought we already discussed it (I recall your email about package qpxtool).
Short story:
I prepared a number of QA uploads before Wheezy freeze, n
Hi Thibaut,
> Just thinking aloud: the problem with the current scheme is that the
> game data file will be present twice in the user system: on real FS and
> in VFS. That could be avoided only by copying the fonts in
> astromenace-data source, so I guess we'll have to live with that. I'm
> wonder
Hi Thibaut,
I have updated packages "astromenace" and "astromenace-data". Now all issues
should be solved.
Links for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/astromenace/astromenace_1.3.1+ds-1.dsc
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/a/astromenace-data/astromenace
Hi,
> Since no one else here seems to be wondering, I'll just ask myself: Is
> there any reason why the package is going to be renamed to "premake4",
> i.e. appending the major version to the package name?
>
> If this is going to get uploaded as "premake4", this is technically not
> an adoption of
Hi Markus,
Thanks for notes.
> just a comment on the copyright file. You are targeting the data for
> non-free but actually the game data is licensed under free licenses,
> namely GPL-3+ and CC-BY-SA-3.0. I assume the precompiled 3D models are
> the reason why astromenace-data should be in non-fr
Hi Ftp Masters,
During packaging astromenace-data package [1][2] I have faced with issue
of adding fonts into game data file. Full log of our discussion you can
find at [3]. In short:
1) astromenace-data is non-free package because of [4].
2) When package astromenace-data is built, system fonts ar
Hi Paul,
I saw a lot of your messages related to fonts in Debian, also there was one
or few posts in your blog (I do not remember precisely). So it looks that
your well versed in this matter.
Could you comment our discussion about astromenace-data package? Quotation:
> There is a more serious pr
Hi Thibaut,
> In the rules file for astromenace data, you list fonts in
> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-liberation/, but the files there are
> symlinks to files in /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation/. The symlinks
> are provided by a compatility package which is not listed in your
> build-depend
>> If you agree with this tricky/artful solution I will prepare updated package
>> astromenace this evening.
>
> Forget it, I will upload as is after a last round of checks and after I
> manage to setup a local repo for use with pbuilder.
I have just updated package at m.d.n [1]. Now it includes
Hi again,
> However, I have an alternative proposal which would avoid the problem
> and should not impose too much hassle on you: ship the entire source in
> astromenace-data, build the executable there, use it to package the
> data, but do not ship the built executable.
Thank you for the interes
Hi Thibaut,
> Can you explain why you chose to split the source? This forces you to
> have astromenace only recommend astromenace-data, which is not good
> since you can't play the game without the data.
I have at least three reasons for this:
1) It is more convenient in maintaining. Data files a
Hi everyone,
Debian Policy (section 12.1) tell us that each program in /usr/bin should has
a manual page. And there is the related warning in Lintian.
But I am interested what is the best practise in case of trivial bash scripts
(which usually set up necessary environment variables and launch bin
Hi,
Four weeks passed since our discussion. Any progress on this?
Maybe it would be better to postpone additional changes for future uploads.
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Hi,
Month passed. Anyone interested?
RFS: http://bugs.debian.org/696385
Regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/656811359538...@web5d.yandex
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtk2-engines-qtcurve". I have tried
to contact with previous sponsor 3 times, but there are no replies still.
(Last email was sent on 30 October 2012)
Basic information:
http://mentors.debian.net/pack
> This means: You do not need to subscribe to a new list if you are a
> debian-mentors reader, all relevant (human contributed) content will be
> forwarded to that list, but the complete noise^W^W^W^W^Winformation is
> available through package-sponsorship-requests@l.d.o only. If you prefer
> to ge
I think the public discussion is preferable.
2013-01-15, 14:44, "Robert J. Clay" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Boris Pek wrote:
>
>> Since RFS bug reports via sponsorship-requests pseudo-package is widely used
>> now, is not it the good idea to disable f
Hi,
Since RFS bug reports via sponsorship-requests pseudo-package is widely used
now, is not it the good idea to disable feature "Comments" on package pages?
If not, then could you fix notifications about new comments? They are not sent
to email now. [1]
Best wishes,
Boris
[1] I faced with it h
Anyone interested?
2012-12-17 23:48, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for a package "matanza".
>
> It builds binary package:
>
Hi,
> - Another pedantic issue: there are 2 commas in a row in your
> build-depends list for astromenace-data (i.e. debhelper (>=
> 9),,fonts-liberation...).
Fixed.
> have astromenace-data recommends/suggests astromenace
Done.
> - astromenace-data FTBFS when built twice in a row:
Fixed.
Than
Hi,
> IANADD, but here's a list of things that I encountered while testing
> out your package.
Thanks a lot for a review.
> - Since you use xz compression, please consider adding Pre-Depends:
> dpkg (>= 1.15.6) to debian/control (i.e. lintian tag
> data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends, wh
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Fathi Boudra
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kde-style-qtcurve". I have tried
to contact with previous sponsor 3 times, but there are no replies still.
(Last email I sent on 30 October 2012)
Basic information:
http://
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "astromenace" and "astromenace-data".
Basic information:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/astromenace
http://mentors.debian.net/package/astromenace
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for a package "matanza".
It builds binary package:
matanza - Space ascii war game
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
Hi,
> I can do everything using uscan, tar, sed and wget, so I think this is not a
> problem.
>
> During the process I need to create a temporary directory. Should I delete it
> at the end of get-orig-source? Should I delete it in clean?
Yes, only tarball should be left as a result.
See Debian Po
Anyone interested?
2012-10-11 17:39, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".
>
> It builds one binary package:
> zgv - SVG
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".
It builds one binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
Direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-6.dsc
Hi,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "leechcraft".
It builds those binary packages:
leechcraft - Full LeechCraft installation
leechcraft-advancednotifications - Advanced Notifications framework for
LeechCraft
leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
leec
Hi,
> How can i exclude hurd-i386 from a build
Architecture: linux-any kfreebsd-any
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/83861349362
Hi,
Unfortunately my sponsor of "psi-plus" package still has no time for package
"psi-plus-i18n" (since March month) and I am looking for a sponsor for it:
http://bugs.debian.org/673457
To prevent possible questions: yes, newer translations are available in
upstream repo, but this version (0.15
Hi,
>> I'd like to maintain some packages, which are removed in sid now.
>> (scim-hangul, scim-sunpinyin, scim-pinyin, scim-array).
>> How should I do? Should I send a WNPP bug report as a usual new
>> package, or just package it, change the maintainer to me and
>> upload it to mentors.debian
Hi,
> Sounds like a good idea. Which (pbuilder or cowbuilder) would you recommend?
I recommend cowbuilder. It's much faster and it less pull a hard drive.
(Last is important for me as I use laptop)
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
>> Add temporary PPA for this? These files will needed during less than a day
>> in my case.
>
> I assure you no one will mind having one hang around. PPAs are nice to
> have around, even if you don't use them.
>
> I have one that I use for stuff like this, it's not like it's a burden
> on the sy
>> Could you suggest any free hosting where I can put source package
>> files and they will be available using dget?
>
> Unfortunately no, I usually just serve them off my home Internet
> connection when I need to do that, but I'm also a sysadmin by trade.
> I guess you don't have a personal Web
>> I need to upload updated package with Ubuntu-specific patch. This
>> package will be uploaded into Ubuntu by avoiding Debian archive.
>
> Wouldn't an Ubuntu PPA be more appropriate for that use case?
Add temporary PPA for this? These files will needed during less than a day in
my case.
> Ho
Hi,
> Unfortunately your package "..." was rejected because of the following
> reason:
>
> You are not uploading to one of those Debian distributions: oldstable stable
> unstable experimental stable-backports oldstable-backports
> oldstable-backports-sloppy
> oldstable-security stable-security t
Hi,
> I'm interested in making a Debian package of my own software Fortuner,
> homepage https://github.com/jnumm/fortuner . The software is a
> modernization of classic UNIX fortune program. I think it falls under
> the games category so I'm writing on pkg-games list, too.
>
> Should I put this pa
Forwarded from debian...@lists.debian.org :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some time ago PTS checked http://mentors.debian.net/ for new source packages
>> which were waiting for a sponsor. If new version of source package available
>> an appropriate item was added in todo section on package page.
>>
>> But now
Hi,
> turnserver - server for ICE/STUN/TURN, NAT traversal for SIP and Jabber
Have you asked Debian VoIP Team [1]? They might be interested in this package.
Regards,
Boris
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/VoIP/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
See also:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00680.html
Quotation:
"I don't think targetting experimental for unmaintained packages makes sense."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 679049 - not-fit-for-wheezy + for-wheezy
thanks
Waiting for reply:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00308.html
(See also timestamps)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.deb
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".
It builds binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://men
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "awffull".
It builds binary package:
awffull - web server log analysis program
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
U
2012-06-29 05:58, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:00:06PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
>
>> Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.
>>
>> Now there are only such changes:
>>
>> libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
>
>
Hi,
> % debdiff xmhtml1_1.1.7-17_amd64.deb xmhtml1_1.1.7-18_amd64.deb
> [The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
> different names, permissions or owners.]
>
> Files in first .deb but not in second
> -
> -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "lightspeed".
It builds binary package:
lightspeed - Shows how objects moving at relativistic speeds look like
To access further information about this packag
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "exactimage".
It builds those binary packages:
edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer)
exactimage - fast image manipulation programs
exa
Hi,
> The upstream authors doesn't have this version available as tarball for
> download, I had to create the tarball myself. The main differences
> between the 0.1.1 stable version and this git commit is only about the
> construct system: I have made some suggestions and they included it in
> the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "qpxtool".
It builds those binary packages:
libqpx-dev - CD/DVD quality checker (development files)
libqpx0 - CD/DVD quality checker (shared libraries)
pxf
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "xmhtml".
It builds those binary packages:
xmhtml1 - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (library)
xmhtml1-dev - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (development
Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.
Now there are only such changes:
libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* Added debian/watch.
* Updated debian/control:
- added homepage field
- fixed lintian warning package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depen
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
> Please use X-Debbugs-Cc instead of regular Cc when filing bugs:
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc
Yes, I didn't know about it when I sent this RFS, but I already used it in my
recent messages.
>> * Translation files were moved to new package libvisual-0.4
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "sgml-data".
It builds binary package:
sgml-data - common SGML and XML data
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
Hi,
> I’ve taken care of the RC bug for now, so the freeze won’t be a
> problem.
Yes, I've got the messages from BTS. You forgot to close bug #606038.
I'll close it.
> I’ve not got the time to look at your suggested package,
As usual.
> Like this, you two’ve got more time to get the package
>> Why NMU? First freeze is soft and QA uploads and even upload with
>> increasing of
>> version are allowed. Isn't it? But yes, this can be hard for release team.
>
> Because once the freeze is in effect only RC bug fixes are allowed in.
> So the changes need to be minimal at that point. My NMU
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sgml-data".
>
> You say "QA upload" below, I guess you don't mean to adopt the package,
> right?
Yes, right. That phrase is from template on m.d.n.
> Thanks for taking care of this package. This upload fixes at least one
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcdaudio".
It builds those binary packages:
libcdaudio-dbg - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs
(debug)
libcdaudio-dev - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio C
retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for
Psi+
thanks
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5338.4-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sgml-data".
It builds binary package:
sgml-data - common SGML and XML data
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/sg
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libvisual".
It builds those binary packages:
libvisual-0.4-0 - Audio visualization framework
libvisual-0.4-0-i18n - Audio vi
Processed moment ago. Thanks.
2012-06-21 09:51, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
> via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
> uploads (tested using dput).
>
>
Hi,
Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
uploads (tested using dput).
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "unadf".
It builds binary package:
unadf - Extract files from an Amiga Disk File dump (.adf)
To access further information
>> This is QA upload. I won't be the maintainer of this package.
>> I just want to improve its quality while it has no maintainer.
>
> Well, you should ask to the QA team then, no ?
Hmm, you are right. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
> Why don't you upload it into Debian Science instead ? (and set the
> maintainer to Debian Science ?
This is QA upload. I won't be the maintainer of this package.
I just want to improve its quality while it has no maintainer.
> See
> http://debian-science.alioth.debi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-science mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libquantum".
It builds those binary packages:
libquantum-dev - library for the simulation of a quantum computer
(develo
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
> 117 files changed, 7945 insertions(+), 1683 deletions(-)
Yes, two years passed since previous stable release of uHub.
> Please ask on mentors or your former sponsor.
Unfortunately my regular sponsor (Dmitry E. Oboukhov) currently is busy.
Package is waiting for up
Hi,
Now package builds fine on kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kde-gtk-config&suite=experimental
And it should be no problems with linux-based environments on other supported
architectures. So I have updated the package:
kde-gtk-config (3:2.0-3) unstab
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to the debian-s390 mailing list)
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub" [1]. Almost a month
passed without any reply.
This version of package should fix FTBFS on s390 and s390x. Which is now
important as I see in debian-devel-anno
Hi,
> Yes, but for nearly all packages, they are in the source of the package
> themselves. So even if the translations are in a separate binary
> package, the source is still the same as the main package. So, did you
> consider including it in your psi-plus package?
Yes, most of sources comes wi
Hi,
More than 2 weeks passed without any reply.
Is here any interested in translations for Debian?
Package is very simple. It will not require a lot of time for check.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-18 22:40, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
Hi,
> Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
>
> With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
> entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show "Raleigh"
> nor "DejaVu Sans 9", but "oxygen-gtk" and "Bitstream Charter 12" (and "Emacs"
> f
Hi,
> Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
>
> With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
> entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show "Raleigh"
> nor "DejaVu Sans 9", but "oxygen-gtk" and "Bitstream Charter 12" (and "Emacs"
> f
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
> 2) Handling of the transition
>
> I just tested with a clean user: the current kde-config-gtk-style creates one
> .gtkrc-2.0-kde while your new kde-config-gtk-style creates one .gtkrc-2.0-kde4
> that is a symlink to .gtkrc-2.0 . You should probably cope with
> 04_no_
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: h
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eiskaltdcpp/eiskaltdcpp_2.2.7-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/leechcraft/leechcraft_0.5.70+dfsg-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
Hi,
> No need to send reminders to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org . The package is
> still on these lists, so it won't be forgotten
Yes, but it can be there during months or years without any reply. There are no
RC or important bugs in this package. And it could be hard to find the sponsor
for
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-15 11:29, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking fo
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
