On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> Well, also there is the endian problem. I don't know how 1.4 debs ended
> up on these machines, because I have a check in configure that
> disallows compiles on big-endian machines (since the datastructures are
> defined as little-endian, and I haven't
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> Well, also there is the endian problem. I don't know how 1.4 debs ended
> up on these machines, because I have a check in configure that
> disallows compiles on big-endian machines (since the datastructures are
> defined as little-endian, and I haven't
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> So basically, I should change "Architecture: any" to specifically not
> list alpha (and other platforms lacking Qt)?
H...I would say no, personally, only because it's a compiler problem
which is likely to be fixed eventually. If it were something
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> So basically, I should change "Architecture: any" to specifically not
> list alpha (and other platforms lacking Qt)?
H...I would say no, personally, only because it's a compiler problem
which is likely to be fixed eventually. If it were something
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I've found that Qt builds surprisingly well if I use Compaq's cxx compiler.
> It might be nice if the qt packages were structured to allow rebuilding with
> different compilers, although having Qt Build-Depend on a non-free package is
> not a very good
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I've found that Qt builds surprisingly well if I use Compaq's cxx compiler.
> It might be nice if the qt packages were structured to allow rebuilding with
> different compilers, although having Qt Build-Depend on a non-free package is
> not a very good
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> So, if you had your package for 26 days, the possibility is that qt2.2
> hasn't been available on all arches when you had it installed.
>
> Have you tried looking at the build logs and its date ?
Alpha has serious gcc/g++ problems with Qt 2.2, so don
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> So, if you had your package for 26 days, the possibility is that qt2.2
> hasn't been available on all arches when you had it installed.
>
> Have you tried looking at the build logs and its date ?
Alpha has serious gcc/g++ problems with Qt 2.2, so do
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Yes, build daemons for i386, m68k, sparc, powerpc should be active.
> I'm not sure about the alpha one, but there's always Chris Chimelis :)
Hehehe...just call me Chris "build daemon" Chimelis :-) If dinstall puts
a package into the master archives, I b
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Yes, build daemons for i386, m68k, sparc, powerpc should be active.
> I'm not sure about the alpha one, but there's always Chris Chimelis :)
Hehehe...just call me Chris "build daemon" Chimelis :-) If dinstall puts
a package into the master archives, I
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, zhaoway wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have a bug on compiling on m68k. i have no experience beyond i386.
> is there some guideline/step-by-step/tutorial on dealing with such
> bugs?
Not really, since every platform has its quirks. I don't have an m68k,
but perhaps I can help you thro
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, zhaoway wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have a bug on compiling on m68k. i have no experience beyond i386.
> is there some guideline/step-by-step/tutorial on dealing with such
> bugs?
Not really, since every platform has its quirks. I don't have an m68k,
but perhaps I can help you thr
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> Looks like theres allready a netsaint package in woody...
Oops...I missed that. Thanks for catching this :-)
C
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> Figures :)
>
> Thanks. I should have checked first.
>
> Well, my background right now is mostly systems administration and
> programming, anyone got a service or something console based that needs
> to be packaged? :)
I've got the beginnings of a netsai
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> Looks like theres allready a netsaint package in woody...
Oops...I missed that. Thanks for catching this :-)
C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> Figures :)
>
> Thanks. I should have checked first.
>
> Well, my background right now is mostly systems administration and
> programming, anyone got a service or something console based that needs
> to be packaged? :)
I've got the beginnings of a netsa
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> I am also interested in packaging. This would be my first package. If
> noone comes out from before and jumps up and down about doing it, I
> would be interested in packaging sphinx.
If this is the sphinx that's a speech recognition library and utilitie
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> I am also interested in packaging. This would be my first package. If
> noone comes out from before and jumps up and down about doing it, I
> would be interested in packaging sphinx.
If this is the sphinx that's a speech recognition library and utiliti
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
> I've put 'Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libstdc++2.10, wish'
> Which is the best solution, let gocr depends on wish or
> make two packages (1 with only one small binary)?
Make sure not to hard-code the libc6 dependency (let dpkg-shlibdeps
handle it via
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
> I've put 'Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libstdc++2.10, wish'
> Which is the best solution, let gocr depends on wish or
> make two packages (1 with only one small binary)?
Make sure not to hard-code the libc6 dependency (let dpkg-shlibdeps
handle it vi
On 2 Aug 2000, Christian Marillat wrote:
> CCC> I'd forward it upstream, personally. In other words, file it as a bug
> CCC> with the Helix folk and mark it as forwarded in our BTS.
>
> I just discovered the Helix BTS.
Yeah, I had the URL ready in case you didn't have it yet.
> This problem i
On 2 Aug 2000, Christian Marillat wrote:
> CCC> I'd forward it upstream, personally. In other words, file it as a bug
> CCC> with the Helix folk and mark it as forwarded in our BTS.
>
> I just discovered the Helix BTS.
Yeah, I had the URL ready in case you didn't have it yet.
> This problem
On 2 Aug 2000, Christian Marillat wrote:
> This is the 3th bugs against Helix package in our BTS.
>
> I close these bug without reading them.
>
> But for one I've some problem (bug 68343).
>
> This bug has been closed 2 times and reopen 2 times. Here is the latest
> reopen:
>
> What I need t
On 2 Aug 2000, Christian Marillat wrote:
> This is the 3th bugs against Helix package in our BTS.
>
> I close these bug without reading them.
>
> But for one I've some problem (bug 68343).
>
> This bug has been closed 2 times and reopen 2 times. Here is the latest reopen:
>
> What I need to
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, andreas palsson wrote:
> This might sound a little strange.
> If I would like to become a debian developer, but I don't have any
> package and maybe I just want to "help" others by testing packages,
> fixing bugs and suppling patches to the original maintainers.
>
> Is this
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, andreas palsson wrote:
> This might sound a little strange.
> If I would like to become a debian developer, but I don't have any
> package and maybe I just want to "help" others by testing packages,
> fixing bugs and suppling patches to the original maintainers.
>
> Is this
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> > > name: gnut
> > > desc: Command line gnutella client
> > > license: GPL
> >
> > Didn't get to check the package too much, bu
On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> > name: gnut
> > desc: Command line gnutella client
> > license: GPL
>
> Didn't get to check the package too much, but did check the
> software. Seems to have problems when finding an interface on Alpha
>
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> > > name: gnut
> > > desc: Command line gnutella client
> > > license: GPL
> >
> > Didn't get to check the package too much, bu
On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> > name: gnut
> > desc: Command line gnutella client
> > license: GPL
>
> Didn't get to check the package too much, but did check the
> software. Seems to have problems when finding an interface on Alpha
&
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> I have a couple of packages done and available at
> http://lit.compsoc.com/~jimregan/debian/
>
> I was wondering if someone could check them out, and maybe sponsor them?
No time to sponsor, but I did test out a few so far on Alpha...comments
below. I
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> I have a couple of packages done and available at
> http://lit.compsoc.com/~jimregan/debian/
>
> I was wondering if someone could check them out, and maybe sponsor them?
No time to sponsor, but I did test out a few so far on Alpha...comments
below.
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> * Platform is only i386 for now. This is likely to change in the
> future.
Is this due to i386-specific asm code or is this package just untested on
other archs? If it's C or C++, I'll take a stab at patching it for Alpha,
but if it's asm
On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Paul Harris wrote:
> could I also please ask Christopher to attempt to build it on his Alpha
> (mmm wish i had access ;). also if anyone has access to a platform other
> than an i386 (i have that), could i get them to please check it out?
I took the Alpha down today (am movi
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Paul Harris wrote:
> ok i forgot to ask: i can compile for i386, but whats the deal with the
> other platforms? how can i test vrweb on those even if i have no access to
> a machine?
I can check it on Alpha, but it may be a few days. Let me know where I
can compile the sour
Oh, FYI, if you upload the same (-3) revision of the package, let me know
and I'll upload my Alpha deb for it as well.
C
Nevermind...tarball wasn't on ftp, but was via http.
It compiles and runs nicely on the Alpha :-) Very nice! I'll have to
start using this one soon :-)
I don't see anything wrong with it. It installed and purged very cleanly
and seems to do everything it needs to (hell, the lintian report on
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Adam Keys wrote:
> This is a GNOME applet that adds some pretty small icons to
> your panel, like Windows' QuickLaunch toolbar. They are smaller
> than the normal GNOME launchers so you can fit more on your panel.
> It can also be torn away from the panel and put elsewhere.
>
On Wed, 8 Sep 1999, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> I dont think the build demons will pick up non-main packages in the near
> future, but maybe we could have a quinn-diff running on contrib and the
> non-* directories, so that we at least know when something is not up to
> date. And somebody coul
On 5 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Could be, but I don't think so. I rather think that it reads a long
> instead of an __u32 and thus gets two __u32 into the long, which then
> is far to big.
Hehehe...that's typical :-) Wouldn't be the first time I've seen that
either.
C
On 5 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I did some fixes and cleanup on the defrag package and have e2dump
> 64Bit clean and 2GB proff now, but still have some bugs left to
> fix. Also the defrag tells me that it can't find inode xxx, where xxx
> is way to big (probably a 64 Bit problem in defra
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Decklin Foster wrote:
> Well, I've been running chimera 1.6/1.7 on an i386 for, hmmm, more
> than a year at least. This is been a combination of compiling from a
> tarball, using Debian's packages, and rolling my own. I haven't ever
> experienced anything like that, so I susp
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Decklin Foster wrote:
> I've been running the actual binary for several weeks with no problems
> (well, other than buggy layout, but that's another issue :-), and it
> went through the suggested upgrade/downgrade tests with no apparent
> problems for me. Thanks for uploading
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Decklin Foster wrote:
> I filed a bug a long time ago against chimera about there being a new
> upstream version (a new patchlevel, really.) It's 79 days old and I
> haven't heard anything. I wish I could NMU it, but I am not a
> developer and do not have a verified PGP key.
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, chris mckillop wrote:
> So, in my efforts to be useful.
>
> I would like to help hunt out and squash some of the bugs currently
> listed on bugs.debian.org. However, it would seem that a little caution
> is in order. How should I approach submitting the fixes I
On Fri, 7 May 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Now it occurs to me that if I rebuild my package and bump up the
> debian version number, then other archs will need to rebuild too
> even thought I have not changed a thing in source.
> Is that the proper thing to do?
Yes. If you need to recompile
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Mika Fischer wrote:
> > This is a possibility for at least m68k, powerpc and alpha (kullervo,
> > tervola and faure @ debian.org), but unless you specifically want to
> > or need to, I wouldn't bother.
>
> Na, I don't think I want to.
I don't blame you on this :-) I'm one o
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Check out the archive for debian-alpha, an offer to debian developers
> who want to use an alpha was made (last week I think). Look for "Danny
> ter Haar".
> But maybe you want to get in touch with [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also check the
> archive!) ? He's th
48 matches
Mail list logo
