ctly which part does what etc., but I thought sending
this quick note wouldn't hurt.)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
(dropping debian-boot@, adding 845311@)
Hi Jens,
Jens Sauer (2016-11-22):
> Thank you for reviewing this package. It was my first time doing this,
> I hope everything is alright.
It looks to me everything was right on the first attempt. :)
> I opened a RFS to find a sponsor for the upload:
> h
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho (16/08/2012):
> There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is not
> "removed" in the sense that word is commonly used without qualifiers. (The
> proper way to describe what happened to the package is "removed from testing"
> -
> a release engineeri
Bertrand Marc (21/04/2012):
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libextractor"
Please don't sponsor this package. It's currently involved in the exiv2
transition, and it's painful enough already.
Please make sure to wait for an ACK from the release team to #672117.
Mr
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan McCrohan (26/01/2012):
> apt-rdepends lists the following reverse dependencies:
>
> libconfig8
> Reverse Depends: guestfish (1:1.14.8-3)
> Reverse Depends: guestmount (1:1.14.8-3)
> Reverse Depends: libconfig8-dev (= 1.3.2-2)
> Reverse Depends: libguestfs-tools (1:1
Felix Geyer (17/01/2011):
> I didn't realize that you were talking about the patch itself.
> Attaching it now.
Thanks, sponsored. Thanks for spotting I failed to get it fixed in the
first place, too.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello Paul.
Paul Wise (05/05/2010):
> Should XSF packages have the team address in Maintainer?
Yes. That's the kind of stuff I'm going to detail later on while
reviewing this package.
> Any idea why upstream installs a .la file for the driver? Surely that
> isn't needed. Do the RedHat/Fedora in
Liang Guo (04/05/2010):
> Hi!
Hello!
> Have you checked my package ? Any sugestion ?
I've been quite busy lately (see the various X-related uploads), but I
haven't forgotten about your package. I might come to it in a few
days, if everything goes right.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description
Hi!
(Keeping you Cc'd for now, I'm not sure which lists you're subscribed
to.)
Liang Guo (21/04/2010):
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-
> qxl/xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.12-1.dsc
I had a *very* quick look, and it didn't sound too bad. I'd have to
double-c
Mats Erik Andersson (01/04/2010):
> I probably prematurely responded to an RFP for 'oftpd', an FTP
> server for only anonymous access, and only giving read access.
Another questions comes to mind: do we need this package? I'd hope
several of which we already have can be trivially configured in th
Christoph Egger (01/04/2010):
> Do you think it's sensible to have that packaged in debian (and
> it's stable releases)?
That's a question (but the other one can be replied to with a dummy RC
bug prevening migration until it's in shape for a stable release,
should the instability be only te
Hi,
Christoph Egger (28/03/2010):
> > I get the impression that S. Engelsman took the function
> > interruptibleXNextEvent() from Mark J. Kilgard's contribution to
> > Blender, and then Engelsman wrote the replacing call instead of
> > XNextEvent().
>
> So this patch is part of Debian's bl
Krzysztof Burghardt (26/03/2010):
> AFAIR tga was supported earliest.
OK, thanks.
Upload on its way.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Krzysztof Burghardt (24/03/2010):
> The upload would fix these bugs: 509778, 534210, 565872
Hi,
I'm wondering why you're pointing to tga files, given that default
images are xpm.gz ones? I don't mind that much, just asking. ;)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Krzysztof Burghardt (20/03/2010):
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1
> of my package "grub2-splashimages".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> grub2-splashimages - a collection of great GRUB2 splashimages
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
Jari Aalto (02/03/2010):
> [Please keep CC]
[Done.]
> Can anyone see any obvious errror, that eludes my eyes? Files
> available at:
$ cat dyndns-2010.0301+gitdd160bd/debian/source/format
3.0 (native)
(Enjoy 3.0…)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jaromír Mikeš (28/02/2010):
> Exist some way to create _.orig.tar.gz from
> -.tar.gz without complete debianization? And make
> md5 for both files identical?
Sure: mv does that. :)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dominik George (26/02/2010):
> OK, as it is done in postinst, there does not seem to be a
> difference to my current chown setup. dpkg-statoverride will make
> sure that the permissions are set everytiem the file is
> re-installed, but chown in postinst will as well ...
And will nuke possible loc
Cyril Brulebois (07/01/2010):
> I might take a look later today. IRC ping (KiBi) or private mail
> ping appreciated.
Uploaded, thanks. Let's hope I didn't miss anything. First 3.0 package
I'm uploading.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Wen-Yen Chuang (01/01/2010):
> The upload would fix 1 minor bug which is listed below.
Hi,
I might take a look later today. IRC ping (KiBi) or private mail ping
appreciated.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Peter Pentchev (07/01/2010):
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
if nobody beats me to it, I could have a look tonight (UTC+1). IRC
ping (KiBi) or private mail ping appreciated, I only read -mentors
from time to time these days.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signatur
Christoph Egger (08/12/2009):
> I'm rather tempted to sponsor your fixed package.
Good call. ;)
As for config.{guess,sub}, no need to conditionalize the
'cp'. autotools-dev is in Build-Depends and if it'd stop shipping
those files, or in different locations, you want to know about this
thr
Rodolphe Quiédeville (02/12/2009):
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pgpool2/pgpool2_2.2.5-2.dsc
For -mentors@'s record, I reviewed this package and made a few
remarks, being integrated/worked on. Please hold on any upload.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Felipe Sateler (27/11/2009):
> Which would be...?
That KiBi should have checked facts better when reporting the FTBFS
bug. The B-D was indeed there. Lalala. :)
(Sorry for the lag, I only open -mentors@ from time to time.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
David Claughton (28/11/2009):
> So, rather than jumping straight in with a ITA, I wonder if I could
> ask someone to take a look at what I've done and see if it looks OK?
> If it's not too far off the mark, I'd be interested in maintaining
> it. OTOH if the response is "go away and come back when
(Getting rid of all Cc's…)
Cristian Greco (26/11/2009):
> Please file a bug against the pseudo-package ftp.debian.org
> requesting mppenc to be removed from the archive, then.
It'd be nice to update #540131 accordingly, I almost sponsored the
source package linked there. Sounded like nice work,
Benoit Mortier (21/11/2009):
> So my question is can we use linux-any today or do we have to fix
> the problem an other way ?
Keep “Architecture: any” for now, possibly FTBFS very early when not
on a Linux architecture (you could use a check on DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS in
debian/rules), and get your pack
Joachim Wiedorn (27/11/2009):
> thanks for this informations!
Nice to see you noticed the FTBFS yourself. I opened a bug anyway
(before opening my =debian-mentors/ folder). :)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Felipe Sateler (26/11/2009):
> Your package build-depends on ccache, and it actively enforces it in
> the debian/rules file. Why is that?
>
> I would be willing to bet money that the problem is that buildd's
> have no (writable) home directory, so ccache fails. Drop the ccache
> stuff, or if it _
Cyril Brulebois (28/08/2009):
> > > #322207 audiooss: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
>
> I think that one is mostly OK, but I wanted to double-check
> something too.
Uploading.
Also, people wanting to work on those packages may want to join
#debian-kbsd (OFTC) to coordinate and avoid
Sandro Tosi (28/08/2009):
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 14:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Sandro Tosi (28/08/2009):
> >> Since everyone can do QA uploads (it's not only the QA team ;) I
> >> think this is a perfect task for any perspective maintainer to do
> >&g
Sandro Tosi (28/08/2009):
> Hi Petr,
> thanks for your email.
(For those wondering, I had it privately some days ago, but the reply
I was writing got lost.)
> Since everyone can do QA uploads (it's not only the QA team ;) I
> think this is a perfect task for any perspective maintainer to do
> so
Miguel Landaeta (18/08/2009):
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.1.1-3 of
> package jabberd14. The upload would fix this bug: 542131.
Hi,
please keep the submitter Cc'd when replying to some bug, or you're
not going to receive any feedback, except in rare cases. (And I'd have
s
Juan Angulo Moreno (21/01/2009):
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/anyremote/anyremote_4.15-1.dsc
Here we go, based on the source package only:
- debian/anyremote-doc.docs:
+ Extra newline (cosmetic, doesn't hurt)
- debian/control:
+ I don't think anyremote-doc should depen
(Not sure the Cc was needed, keeping it just in case.)
Bernd Zeimetz (21/01/2009):
> I'll take care of this. Btw Juan, you could ping me directly, I'll
> happily sponsor packages for my NMs.
Hello here,
as discussed on IRC, I finally will do. Note that I'm already sponsoring
{g,k}anyremote, so
Neil Williams (19/01/2009):
> It is simple to pass the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage and then dpkg
> includes all the changes since the specified -v into the .changes file
> and the bugs get closed just fine.
It is very simple to overlook/forget about passing once one is
(finally!) satisfied wit
Ben Finney (19/01/2009):
> Yes, that's exactly what I was hoping to get from my packages (and
> thought it was my responsibility to do so; I wasn't fully aware that
> the sponsor re-builds the package and uploads the result).
(Just for completeness, from a pratical point of view:)
Well, you uplo
Ben Finney (19/01/2009):
> latest_debian_version=$(rmadison --suite ${suitename} ${packagename} \
> | cut -d'|' -f 2 | sed -e 's/^[[:space:]]+//')
Beware, you need to limit that to the source (in case there's a binary
built that has the same name, and in case there are some archs out of
sync)
Paul Wise (19/01/2009):
> As a sponsor, usually I would do stuff like this:
>
> dget http://mentors.foo...-3.dsc
> apt-get source foo
> interdiff -z -p1 foo...-1.diff.gz foo...-3.diff.gz | less
Why aren't you using “debdiff foo*-{1,2}.dsc”?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital s
Neil Williams (19/01/2009):
> > Do you, as a developer, bump the debian revision each time you build
> > a package, are ready to upload it, and discover one final problem
> > with it? Do you, under that scenario, write in the changelog a new
> > bullet point "Oh, I botched the rules file writing
Ruben Molina (18/01/2009):
> > - You are *not* allowed to change past changelog entries. The changelog
> Why not? I was unable to find any reference to this on the policy or
> the developers reference...
Indeed, looks like I cannot back up that claim either. Ongoing
discussion on debian-de...@.
Jonathan Wiltshire (18/01/2009):
> I've also added DM-Upload-Allowed to debian/rules too, in advance of
> applying for DM status, unless you want it missed out for now.
Hi,
I'd like to see how the things go on debian-newmaint@ first; so I don't
really want to add it preventively. I'll gladly do
Ruben Molina (17/01/2009):
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.4.7-1 of my package
> "dict-jargon".
Hello,
only had a quick look since I'm missing time, but:
- You want to say Build-Depends rather than Depends in the changelog.
- You are *not* allowed to change past changelog en
Charles Plessy (16/01/2009):
> > Examine the ‘foo.diff.gz’
>
> cat foo.diff.gz | lsdiff, for instance
I think you wanted “zcat”. Anyway, no need to waste a fork:
| lsdiff -z foo.diff.gz
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
George Danchev (03/01/2009):
> > (let me know if you'd prefer a version bump).
>
> I do prefer version bump myself (since that avoids repetitive
> reviewing from scratch, which to be honest turned out to gain over
> some leftover improvements ;-), but I'm not that picky and leave that
> at spon
Evgeni Golov (03/01/2009):
> Dear mentors (and KiBi o<),
Taking it.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jonathan Wiltshire (27/12/2008):
> Same package version is on mentors, if you've time to take a look.
After some nitpick on IRC, uploaded.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jonathan Wiltshire (27/12/2008):
> Ok, I'll address those now - would you like a version bump?
No need, but I can live with it. You can also point poke me on IRC if
you like.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Cyril Brulebois (27/12/2008):
> I'm willing to take a look, I'll get back to you soonish.
So, here it goes:
- there were some changes to upstream sources in the previous revision,
they went away but you're not mentioning it anywhere. Did you lost
them or did you tra
Jonathan Wiltshire (27/12/2008):
> I am seeking a sponsor for my adoption of the package 'adtool' (1.3-2).
I'm willing to take a look, I'll get back to you soonish.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Christoph Egger (21/12/2008):
> Jup I know the procedure, I was more in trouble wether it is
> reasonable. There is no need I guess to have this done for lenny.
You can propose/ask for opinion on debian...@.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Neil Williams (19/12/2008):
> I'm only mentioning this as a caution - I don't consider it a
> practical problem for these particular changes to these particular
> packages. Once Lenny is released and we migrate both tslib and the
> xorg driver into unstable and thence into testing, it would be bes
Pietro Battiston (20/12/2008):
> an ftp master told me that I can find the reason of the rejection of
> the package I'm working on (python-shapely, for those who didn't read
> the "Non free license?" thread) in folder
> /srv/ftp.debian.org/queue/reject/ of server merkel.debian.org. It
> should be
Jonathan Wiltshire (18/12/2008):
> No problem by me :-)
Uploaded as is. I'm assuming you know about lintian and possible
enhancements for this package (and that you already fixed that in
unstable), and that you chose the minimalist approach for this tpu
upload. :)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Des
Jonathan Wiltshire (18/12/2008):
> Hi George
Hello both of you,
> Release have approved the debdiff and asked for the upload; it's on
> mentors at [1] if you have a chance. Cheers :-)
>
> [1]
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul/gxemul_0.4.6.3-1+lenny1.dsc
I can do the uploa
Russ Allbery (11/12/2008):
> ancient-libtool was added at the explicit request of the porters
> because they were seeing obscure bugs and issues on some architectures
> unless a current version of libtool was used. These sorts of bugs
> unfortunately are the kind that can be hidden or cause weird
Raphael Geissert (11/12/2008):
> If it is lintian warning or error then chances are high that there
> *is* a bug.
Chances.
> 1) ancient-libtool is about porting,
is there an FTBFS bug open? Said otherwise: is there an arch where there
is an actual FTBFS?
> 2) debhelper-but-no-misc-depends is a
Raphael Geissert (11/12/2008):
> Why? there's no need to wait until work piles up.
If work is committed in $VCS, then no work is piled up.
No need to generate buildd, mirror, and upgrade noise only to fix some
lintian warnings with no real bug IMHO.
But YMMV.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Descri
Neil Williams (11/12/2008):
> Packages created by the upstream team are generally exceptionally poor
> quality. Even if the upstream team is or includes the Debian
> maintainer, there is no justification for having a .deb on the
> upstream download page - leave it to the packagers.
And packagers
Andy Hawkins (11/12/2008):
> I'm not sure I understand why the debian directory shouldn't be part
> of my 'main' release? What problems does this cause?
Hello, see [1] for some reasons. Have a nice reading.
1.
http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/on_debian_directories_in_upstream_tarballs/
Mra
Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (11/12/2008):
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 13:09 + schrieb Neil Williams:
> > Everyone has to take account of transitions and blocks in unstable
> > between releases, the release freeze itself is just another issue to
> > consider with regard to unstable. Un
Resul Cetin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (11/12/2008):
> Sry, but it is not possible to move head because otherwise upstream
> will kill me. (It is a shared repository with upstream)
Just had a quick look at debcheckout's code, it looks like you would
need to open a bug against it so that you can specify t
Resul Cetin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (11/12/2008):
> I want that debcheckout will checkout debian instead of master.
Tweak HEAD in the repository to point to the wanted branch (yeah, that
shouldn't even exist in a bare repository, etc., but that does exactly
what you need, so… enjoy).
Mraw,
KiBi.
si
Jonathan Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/12/2008):
> This upload adds the VCS-* fields to debian/control and fixes some
> minor lintian warnings.
Hi,
thanks for your attention to details. That doesn't really look like
needing an upload right now, though. I'd wait for a bugfix or a new
upstream
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/12/2008):
> You're talking about the shlib, as explained in my other message, I
> was inadvertently folding the two into one. My mistake.
Finally.
> > You *do* understand the concept of SONAME and shlibs, right?
>
> Yes, but adding symbols "properly" include
Andy Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/12/2008):
> My .deb however doesn't depend on a specific version of libflac, is
> that because there are no versions prior to this available?
It is because currently, libflac doesn't declare its shlibs properly.
Once this is fixed, and once your package has bee
Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10/12/2008):
> > Specify the strict version ahead of shlib:Depends and dpkg-shlibdeps
> > does the right thing.
>
> Thats a hack. Another workaround for broken shlibs is
> debian/shlibs.local.
A very dirty one. The other being the one recommended by the Policy, but
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/12/2008):
> Adding a new function (or several hundred new functions) has
> absolutely ZERO impact on the SONAME as long as the new functions do
> not overlap existing functions, change existing functions or require
> any changes elsewhere in the library that re
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/12/2008):
> > Looks like you just found an RC bug in libflac++6 - includes new
> > symbols in version 1.2.1-1 according to mole but the shlibs does not
> > depend on that version:
>
> That is not a bug - the package building against it merely has to
> require
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/12/2008):
> > Short version: “Fix your shlibs.”
>
> Cyril, we've had this discussion before - merely adding symbols does
> NOT require a SONAME bump.
Neil, read.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Andy Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/12/2008):
> > Please file a bug about this.
>
> Umm, I'll try. I'm not sure exactly what that bug report should say!
> Kind of new to all this Debian packaging stuff (as of this time last
> week I knew nothing about it!).
Short version: “Fix your shlibs.”
Sli
Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/12/2008):
> > package-has-a-duplicate-relation depends: libflac++6, libflac++6 (>= 1.2.1)
>
> According to the man dpkg-gencontrol, just place 'libflac++6(>=1.2.1)'
> before the '${shlibs:Depends}', and dpkg-control with throw away less
> strong dependenc
Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (30/11/2008):
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/commons-vfs/commons-
> vfs_1.0-3.dsc
Heh, please don't wrap URL lines. :)
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Sure, looks fine, uploading.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.a
Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (30/11/2008):
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sqlline/sqlline_1.0.2-2.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Hi Damien,
it's fine, uploading it.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (28/11/2008):
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Taken care of after some modifications.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/11/2008):
> yes it it: you have to provide a programmatical way to
> retrive/generate the orig.tar.gz […]
FSVO “have to”. It is clearly tagged as optional in Policy §4.9.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 10/11/2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Hm, I thought you're not supposed to use debconf to display notes, and that
> NEWS.Debian is preferred.
Yeah, otherwise Christian is coming after you; and you don't want that.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/11/2008):
> The most foolproof way of testing whether the package in question
> builds in pbuilder. pbuilder starts with a clean chroot, downloads the
> build dependencies, installs them and then copies and builds your
> package in that clean environment. If th
Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (02/11/2008):
> If the build-deps are satisfied and build-essential is installed, the
> package should build, so yeah, file bugs at severity serious please.
For reference:
Do folks think #505040 is RC or should at least be
fixed for lenny?
KiBi: nope, the pa
Mauro Lizaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22/09/2008):
> BTW, if you sponsor this package, the only thing left is to contact
> RMs explaining the situation, right?
Mostly, yes.
> [0] http://lusers.com.ar/packages/python-osd_0.2.14-4.dsc
Hmm, many remarks:
- debian/rules modifications aren't documented
Kel Modderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22/09/2008):
> > BTW, Since the bug in the previous revision practically renders
> > pyosd unusable, in order to have the chance to update this package
> > on Lenny would be OK to change the severity from 'normal' to
> > 'important' and/or the urgency to 'high'?
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21/09/2008):
> as you may know, I'm going to be more available nowadays. :)
As discussed, please people hold on, and don't upload it, since the
package name is going to change.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/07/2008):
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sqlline".
Again, after some private mails, finally uploaded.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/08/2008):
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.7-1
> of package "jzlib".
As said through private mail, finally uploaded.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/07/2008):
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mina".
As said through private mail, finally taken care of.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (17/09/2008):
> I'd like to remove bluetooth-alsa and libsbc from Debian completely.
> It was already removed (at my request) from unstable, but it is still
> in Lenny. How can I remove it from Lenny? Reportbug tell me that
> package does not exist when tryin
Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (02/09/2008):
> My usual sponsor is Cyril Brulebois (kibi), I've tried asking him for
> an upload several time, but never gotten a response
You had on IRC, and that was “too busy to sponsor anything for now”.
Mraw,
KiBi — M-x catchup-mod
Carlos Martín Nieto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/09/2008):
> I am looking for someone to upload an updated version of mpop. Cyril
> Brulebois originally reviewed it, but it has been more than a month
> since that (I've been away from my computer and my keys), so I'm
> a
Julien Lavergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/09/2008):
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-art-ng".
> The goal of Gnome-art-ng is to replace gnome-art (non maintained
> upstream, see http://www.miketech.net/gnome-art/index.php). It provides
> the same features: […]
Maybe you could keep t
Al Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/09/2008):
> OTOH, devreference is not a collection of common used practices (what
> is may be sad)
I beg to differ. Once a practice is common enough, it'd quite
interesting to have it documented so that others can easily follow
what de facto consensus has been re
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (17/09/2008):
> the best way to figure out is to send a patch and see if it is
> accepted ;)
IIRC, a bit of standardization got discussed already (on -devel), so a
potential patch sender may want to check that first.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Jean Parpaillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/09/2008):
> Dear mentors,
Salut Jean,
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
as you may know, I'm going to be more available nowadays. :)
See you tomorrow,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (18/09/2008):
> It builds these binary packages:
> elfrc - program to convert arbitrary files into elf objects
In addition to Patrick's comments, I'd suggest to “s/program to //” this
description.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/08/2008):
> Cyril, did you have time to sponsor this package (if it's ok for you,
> of course)?
Here are some comments:
- I assume libjline-java will pull the needed java machinery so you
don't have to depend on a java runtime environment; is that co
Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/08/2008):
> I've uploaded a new package to mentors.debian.net, you should dget it.
Oops, sorry for the lag, will be reviewed tonight.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (08/08/2008):
> I've found the sponsor.
Thanks to let us know, but that'd be handy to send such mails to their
respective RFS threads, so that one can easily check which are [DONE].
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/08/2008):
> Ok with me. On both parts. :)
Thanks for your comments, Ola.
Just FTR, I intend to review/sponsor this package, since I'd like to
have a better view over Damien's work.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/08/2008):
> I'm surprised that this doesn't work. Shouldn't fakeroot handle this
> case and do the right thing? Or am I confused about what fakeroot is
> capable of?
First guess would be missing -X in dh_fixperms call.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/08/2008):
> Since I'd like to familiarize myself with Damien's work, I intend to
> review this package.
Okay, here we go for a first round:
- No need to mention the upstream release number in your first
changelog entry, although i
Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/08/2008):
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.7-1
> of package "jzlib".
Since I'd like to familiarize myself with Damien's work, I intend to
review this package.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
