the
>furnished
>Makefile may need refreshment), I will first give a try to the cmake
>machinery.
>
>So I am looking for a well debiannized software that builts with cmake:
>any idea ?
The latest version of Dynamips (in non-free) builds using CMake.
--
Daniel Lintott
--
To UNS
1.3.0 appears to be the latest version anyway.
[1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-instagram
- --
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQJOBAEBCAA4MRxEYW5pZWwgTGludG90dCAoZGxpbnRvdHQpIDxkYW5pZWxAc2Vy
dmVyYi5jby51az4FAlUpbbYACgkQyHJk111z7G4/xw/7B7uUv4TdaJWjP9Gyty3A
GEg0hDs
-2+
>
> I attached my complete debian/copyright.
>
> Thanks for any pointers, ideas, mistakes.
>
You don't need to duplicate the License text multiple times.
You can simply specify the License field for the files covered by the license
in question.
For example:
Files: debian/*
Copyr
Hi Dave,
On 11/01/15 14:04, Dave Maiorino wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply! Looks like there is still some work that
> needs to be done ;) Thank you for the pointers, I need to go back and
> clean-up more. I have submitted to Pypi a while back, but have not kept
> that packag
ebian/tz-converter/usr/share/tz-converter/tz_converter-1.0.0.egg-info
> /usr/lib/python3.4/distutils/dist.py:260: UserWarning: Unknown distribution
> option: 'install_requires'
> warnings.warn(msg)
I hope that helps, feel free to ask any questions and I'll do my best to
h
On 06/12/14 13:43, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> Hi Everyone!
>
> I'm back working on this problem again...
>
> [...]
>
>
>> (Though it is also quite bad that "_unused" is in global scope in the
>> first place IMHO.)
>>
>
> Can anyone
Hi Everyone!
I'm back working on this problem again...
On 20/10/14 11:55, Etienne Millon wrote:
> * Daniel Lintott [141020 12:38]:
>> Okay.. that points me in the direction of the the
>> common/dynamips_common.h line 83 [1].
>>
>>> #ifndef _unused
Hi Tony,
On 28/11/14 19:35, Tony Houghton wrote:
> I have also posted an unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these
> two "bugs"?
Keep the sponsorship and unblock requests separate as they are two
separate items, handled by different people.
Regards
Daniel
signature.asc
Descript
ncy=medium
+
+ * Do not install files needed by the program to /usr/share/doc
+(Closes: #771135)
+ * Add dh-python to build-depends
+
+ -- Daniel Lintott Thu, 27 Nov 2014 19:56:04 +
+
gns3 (0.8.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Imported Upstream version 0.8.7
diff -Nru gns3-0.8.7/de
FTR... The unblock request has just been approved by the release team
pending the upload of this package
Regards
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
am to /usr/share/doc
(Closes: #771135)
* Add dh-python to build-depends
-- Daniel Lintott Thu, 27 Nov 2014 19:56:04 +
I am aware that the standards version is still at 3.9.5, I haven't
changed this due to needing an unblock from release team (see bug #771230)
Regards,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 02:39:15PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Daniel Lintott wrote:
> > I have a package which is split into two sources (a server and gui). The
> > server version should match the gui version (upstream version) at all times.
>
> > Because of this wh
On 12/11/14 23:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Roger Light wrote:
>> Could you try ${binary:Version} instead?
>
> (= ${binary:Version}) can break binNMUs. Be careful.
>
Indeed, I am keen to try and avoid any breakages like that. I also don't
think the above would w
On 12/11/14 22:40, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> [...]
>
> You require the exact upstream version (1.1).
> This can't work, because there will always be the Debian revision added
> (1.1-1~exp1).
>
I had a suspicion that this was why, but wasn't sure.
> What should work better is '>= ${source:Ups
I have a package which is split into two sources (a server and gui). The
server version should match the gui version (upstream version) at all times.
Because of this when I'm creating the meta-package that will depend on
both the gui and server, should be versioned to to be the same upstream
versi
Hi mentors,
I'm in the process of preparing new packaging for GNS3.
Currently source package gns3 produces one binary package also named
gns3. The newer version of the software has been split into a separate
gui/server (separate source packages).
For the new packaging I prose the following:
Sou
On 06/11/14 10:03, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:45:25PM -0800, Lim Chris wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Package name: ip2location
>> Version : 7.0.0-1
>> Upstream Author : IP2Location
>> URL : http://www.ip2location.com
>
> Is this tool of any use without the co
d __attribute__((unused))
> #endif
Any ideas on where to go from here?
Thanks,
Daniel Lintott
[1]
https://github.com/GNS3/dynamips/blob/master/common/dynamips_common.h#L83
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
For one of my packages (dynamips) I've got a new FTBFS on Ubuntu (but is
replicable on Debian as well).
The last version of the package to compile successfully was 0.2.12
before upstream switched to using CMake (but I think that's a
coincidence as I reproduce the FTBFS using the old Makefile
Hi,
On 14/10/14 18:14, whey bags wrote:
> I tried and it showed as having uploaded in the cli, but when I went
> on the webpage it was the old one.
>
It does sometimes take a while for the upload to be processed and it
appear on the webpage (it won't appear until you've received the email
confir
your request for sponsorship, your sponsor will handle
closing that when they upload your package.
Regards
Daniel Lintott
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
f translations
and submitted an RFS [1] to both debian-mentors and debian-qa, but have
received
no feedback on this.
Hopefully this ping may trigger, a DD to look at the prepared package and upload
it!
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762189
ve you
package prepared using Git:
1. git remote add origin g...@github.com:user/repo.git
2. git push -u origin master
In addition you'll need to push any additional branches (pristine-tar,
upstream) to GitHub.
Hope that helps
Daniel Lintott
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2423777/is
* Wrap-and-sort debian/control
* Use debhelper compat 9
* Bump standards version to 3.9.5, no further changes necessary
-- Daniel Lintott Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:40:01 +0100
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742344#10
signature.asc
D
Hi Guys,
On 16/09/14 07:23, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
> There are no indications that the package has been orphaned, so it
> likely hasn't.
>
In case your not aware, it seems the package has now been orphaned[1] as
of today (excellent work by Ricardo Mones).
Regards,
Daniel
[1] https://bugs.debi
On 15/09/14 20:49, Daniel Svensson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Daniel Lintott <mailto:dan...@serverb.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 15/09/14 20:13, Daniel Svensson wrote:
> > * Add me to Maintainers since old maintainer is M.
Hi Daniel,
On 15/09/14 20:13, Daniel Svensson wrote:
> * Add me to Maintainers since old maintainer is M.I.A.
Did the MIA Team actually orphan the package, as I can't find a WNPP bug
for abraca?
I may be wrong, but I believe unless the package is orphaned, it's not
possible to become maintaine
Hi,
On 15/09/14 09:33, fay...@web.de wrote:
>
> Ok, new version is now uploaded. The new lintian warning looks like an error
> in lintian and not like an error in the copyright file. At least in my
> definition "Zlib or CC0" is not a standard license name but the concatenation
> of two differe
e published, even if they know about the problem.
>
As that tag exists, and effectively breaks the uscan... why not just use
pypi as the source for the watch file. I had to do this for a package I
maintain due to lack of tags, you can see my watch file at [1]
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
[1]
http:
Hi Andreas,
I don't know the reason why, but I'll add the Debian Perl guys into the
loop... as they may well have more of an idea as I know they have doing
a lot of work in relation to the perl 5.20 transition
Regards
Daniel
On 11/09/14 21:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to upl
Hi,
On 26/08/14 11:03, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
>>>
>>> I am not DD, I cannot sponsor you package but have a question,
>>> why is priority for psensor extra ? Should it not be optional ?
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html
>>
>> According to the definition of 'o
ctually common practice as having them on separate lines makes it
easier to review a diff for future versions.
---
Regards
Daniel Lintott
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
Hi Eugene,
On 18/08/14 12:39, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> [...]
>> My suggestion would be to contact upstream and see if they are prepared
>> to make a source package available via the download mechanism.
>>
>
Forwarding to debian-mentors as I forgot to earlier.
Original Message
Subject: Re: RFS: java-comment-preprocessor/5.3.3
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:37:26 +0100
From: Daniel Lintott
To: Eugene Zhukov
CC: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Hi Eugene,
On 18/08/14 09:52, Eugene Zhukov
Hi Darryl,
On 14/08/14 19:15, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:48:31AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qpid-cpp"
>>
>> * Package name: qpid-cpp
>>V
Hi Breno,
On 07/08/14 17:49, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On 07/28/2014 06:52 PM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not a DD so cannot sponsor your package. I haven't tried to build
>> the package, but a couple of comments.
> Thank you, I addressed you co
Hi Eriberto, Grégoire,
I thought I'd just run a test build to see if I could reproduce the
missing hardening... and I can't.
I built the package using an unstable sbuild chroot, and have run both
lintian and blhc on the results.
Neither complained about any missing hardening.
For reference I us
Hi Eriberto,
Thanks for reviewing the package.
On 03/08/14 03:36, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Please:
>
> 1. d/buildinotify.desktop.example has
> 'Name[en_GB]=buildnotify.desktop.example' and 'Name=buildnotify'. Is
> right it? (I think that must be 'Name=buildnotify.desktop.example')
Hi,
I'm not a DD so cannot sponsor your package. I haven't tried to build
the package, but a couple of comments.
On 28/07/14 21:49, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aafigure". This is a package that I
> want to adopt (under ITA) but I am not a DD
On 15/07/14 03:30, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>
>> Only advice I can give you can find in
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2014/07/msg00153.html
>
> Negotiations with sourceforge are continuing but it looks like we
ian.org/debian-mentors/2014/07/msg00153.html
---
Regards
Daniel Lintott
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
Hi,
On 14/07/14 15:07, Eric Maeker wrote:
>>> Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions.
>>> - should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4?
>>
>> Both. for now.
>
> Ok. How can I manage this? Is it possible inside one unique source
> package? Debhelper does only have
Hi Abou,
On 13/07/14 12:40, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> ...
>
> I have tested your tool for Lazarus and it looks working as expected.
>
That's always good to know!
> I'd recommend to use this solution in [2] as it looks really easy to
> maintain/update with so few php lines. Als
n [3] so that we look directly in
> sf.net?
> 3) Have [1] fixed? but how?
>
I think your actually the following the bug at [1]. You can see the
conversation I had with Paul in that bug report.
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752384
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
net/debian/pool/main/b/buildnotify/buildnotify_0.3.5-1.dsc
More information about buildnotify can be obtained from
https://bitbucket.org/Anay/buildnotify.
Changes since the last upload:
buildnotify (0.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #750457)
-- Daniel Lintott Thu, 0
ection : perl
>
You may want to drop an email to the guys on the Debian Perl Group
List(cc'd), and look at maintaining the package within the the team, if
you are interested in that.
I expect one of the DD's from the group... may well pick this up and
fill in more of the d
wrong section. This seems to be confirmed by some past discussions of
extra vs optional [2][3].
Before I went ahead and changed anything or filed a bug report, I
thought I'd get the opinion from here.
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
[1] http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?list=&package=gns3&
the download page
>
I don't know if this is the best method... but it seems to work.
uversionmangle=s/(\d)-(\d-\d)/$1.$2/g
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hing I was able to find was this-
http://www.wefearchange.org/2011/09/sbuild-with-local-newer-dependencies.html
HTH
Daniel Lintott
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Willem,
NB: I'm not a DD so cannot sponsor your package
But a couple of points to consider...
On 26/06/14 15:21, willem kuyn wrote:
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kvmcs-server":
>
> * Package name: kvmcs-server
>Version : 0.4.0
>Upstream Author : wille
to ease backporting?
That is unnecessary as oldstable has debhelper 8 [1]
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debhelper.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #750457)
-- Daniel Lintott Thu, 05 Jun 2014 10:38:07 +0100
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Eric
On 04/06/14 22:17, Eric L. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 4 June 2014 07:24:27 CEST, Cameron Norman wrote:
>> I think users installing this piece of software will expect it to be
>> started at boot, and we should do just that.
>
> Where I do not agree with your conclusion is that _users_ do not in
On 04/06/14 11:40, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 12:07, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>> On 04/06/14 09:53, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>>> BuildNotify lets you "monitor multiple continuous integration servers
>>> with customizable build notifications for all proj
On 04/06/14 09:53, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 07:24, Cameron Norman wrote:
>> El Tue, 3 de Jun 2014 a las 9:03 PM, Eric Lavarde escribió:
>>> Hi Daniel, On 3 June 2014 20:54:58 CEST, Daniel Lintott
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mentors! I
On 04/06/14 06:24, Cameron Norman wrote:
> El Tue, 3 de Jun 2014 a las 9:03 PM, Eric Lavarde escribió:
>> Hi Daniel, On 3 June 2014 20:54:58 CEST, Daniel Lintott
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mentors! I'm currently packaging a notification application,
>> B
On 04/06/14 04:55, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>
>> It only makes sense to start the application when the user logs in,
>> which can be done using the $(HOME)/.config/autostart directory or
>> adding an entry using the
7
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 31 May 2014 23:02:49 BST, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Quoting Daniel Lintott (2014-06-01 00:00:03)
>> I've had a look at dose-builddebcheck, but this doesn't seem to have
>an
>> option for running on a single package.
>
>dose-builddebcheck is wha
as the package is.
I've had a look at dose-builddebcheck, but this doesn't seem to have an
option for running on a single package.
I believe the buildd's do something along these lines prior to building
a package.
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
RFS to backports as well,
but received nil response over there.
I shall reupload the files and ping them again shortly!
--
Daniel Lintott
GPG Key: 4096R/5D73EC6E
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rio your in I
found the following worked:
In debian/rules:
dh $@ --buildsystem=cmake
Regards,
--
Daniel Lintott
GPG Key: 4096R/5D73EC6E
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
u would not get
>that by installing python3, you would have to explicitly install
>python3.4.
>
Although if I've read his control file correct the dependency on python3-all
should pull in 3.3 and 3.4?
---
Regards
Daniel Lintott
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please e
On 24/04/14 12:32, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> thanks for your continuous trials to help me. :-)
>
No problem! I enjoy a good bit of problem solving!
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:22:22AM +0100, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>>
>> Hope that helps...
>
> N
On 24/04/14 10:32, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> On 24/04/14 09:44, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>> On 24/04/14 09:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> if you look at the HTML code of
>>>
>>>http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/download/
>>>
On 24/04/14 09:44, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> On 24/04/14 09:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> if you look at the HTML code of
>>
>>http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/download/
>>
>> you see strings like:
>>
>> \"mkgmap-r3226-src.tar.gz
;Andreas.
>
Using something like this would seem to work, added to the opts
downloadurlmangle=s/\.zip/-src.tar.gz/
Regards,
--
Daniel Lintott
GPG Key: 4096R/5D73EC6E
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ing=/usr/share/keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg"
Running Ubuntu or any other Debian/Ubuntu based operating shouldn't in
my opinion be a barrier to contributing to Debian.
Currently I run Linux Mint and use chroots for Debian Wheezy, Testing
and Unstable as well several Ubuntu releases
urce format '3.0 (quilt)':
non-native package version does not contain a revision
As the correct version number should be: 1.7.3+dfsg-1
Not sure I can be much more help than that... but it would definitely
seem to be an issue with your chroot.
Regards,
--
Daniel Lintott
GPG Key: 4096R/5D73EC6E
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 20/03/14 14:27, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to clean up only those debs from pbuilder apt cache which are
> outdated and not used any more. Since --autocleanaptcache only results
> in printing the help page I did some research and the only hint on the
> weg is this quite old bug in
Hi,
I have had a reply from my usual sponsor, Andrew to say that he
currently doesn't have backports access.
Therefore I would be most grateful if someone else could review and
upload these two packages.
Dynamips - http://mentors.debian.net/package/dynamips
GNS3 - http://mentors.debian.net/packa
* Rebuild for wheezy-backports.
* Bump standards version to 3.9.5 - no changes
-- Daniel Lintott Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:24:17 +
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ast upload:
dynamips (0.2.11-1~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for wheezy-backports.
* Correct my email address in d/copyright
-- Daniel Lintott Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:54:47 +
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
a few packages that you could adapt to
suit your watch file.
I've just tried the following which seems to work:
> version=3
> https://launchpad.net/ocsinventory-server/+download
> .*/OCSNG_UNIX_SERVER-(.+).tar.gz
Though you will need to mangle the upstream versions, to sort th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/14 00:26, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:39:01 +, Dave Walker wrote:
>
>>> Net::Frame::Device includes two scripts that are installed to
>>> /usr/bin, but both have .pl extensions therefore giving me a
>>> Lintian warning
symlinks in /usr/bin, but this
perhaps seems to more work than necessary
Cheers,
Daniel Lintott
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
you to use git-buildpackage. Details are in the
wiki... But I don't have the link to hand.
>Greetings
>Emmanuel
- ---
Regards
Daniel Lintott
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.0.9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/02/14 23:38, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:33:15 +0000, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>
>>> replace "dh $@" with "dh $@ --buildsystem=perl_makemaker" then
>>> dh will use Makefile.PL etc. a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/02/14 22:26, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:18:07 +0000, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>
>> It took a while but I think I got there in the end!
>
> Thanks, I was already looking at the changes :)
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/02/14 19:00, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:49:07 +0000, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>
>>> Please take a look at
>>> http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/policy.html and
>>> http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/02/14 12:27, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:49:21 +0000, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>
>>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsocket6-perl"
>
>>> Have you considered joing the Debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gregor,
On 14/02/14 23:30, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:32:57 +0000, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsocket6-perl"
>>
>&g
ipt to fix
hardening-no-relro warning on Socket6.so
* [71f53f90] debian/control
+ Add VCS fields
* [24b9fbe0] debian/copyright
+Convert to machine readable format
-- Daniel Lintott Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:14:52 +
Regards,
Dani
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nick,
Disclaimer: I'm not a DD, so can't upload your package but have looked
at it, as it is of interest to me.
Generally the package seems to be in very good shape and builds in a
clean chroot fine.
Just touching on the couple of lintian warning
(Makefile fixed for DESTDIR)
* [4ec13364] Add patch to fix lintian warning:
+ manpage-has-errors-from-man hypervisor_mode.7.gz 310:
warning: macro `Bvm' not defined
-- Daniel Lintott Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:20:41 +0000
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roelof,
On 29/01/14 18:48, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Im trying to learn myself the debian way of packaging. My ultimate
> goal is to become the gnome maintainer of Tanglu.
>
> Now I wonder where detailed information can be found about the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/13 19:21, Dominik George wrote:
>> [2] http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=vpcs_0.5b0-1
>
> In that special case, I'd even say your versioning "mistake" is
> good because upstream's ~ notation is a mess. That char is reserved
> for Debian
ebian?
>
> -nik
>
>
The package is in Debian [1] and the watch file status [2]
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/vpcs
[2] http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=vpcs_0.5b0-1
Regards
Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG w
does anyone have any other suggestion on how to correct this
version number?
Regards
Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSp1S6AAoJEMw/9yOWzAkJ5T0H/jq9Hnma75BsYIEPX+8AvuP
ut I'm unsure how it would apply in this case.
Any advice would be welcome, before I continue with the packaging.
Regards
Daniel Lintott
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731713
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using Gn
The issue I currently face is that the .qm files aren't regenerated
when the package is built, so simply patching the .ts won't actually
fix the bug.
How do I include the updated .qm in a new build?
Regards
Daniel Lintott
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714112
Hi Matt,
On 09/11/13 23:21, Matt Flax wrote:
> You caught another bug, thank you. I have uploaded
> gtkiostream-1.3.0.fixedDeb2.tar.gz to the sf.net site.
>
> I have removed the machineGenerated directory from the source dist. by
> using 'nodist' tags in the Makefile.am.
>
> This should be the l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/13 22:47, Matt Flax wrote:
> Thanks for the log.
>
> It looks the same as before. My suspicion is that the
> machineGenerated folder and containing files are still on your
> system. This would happen if the original source code was left on
>
one: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/polyphone INFORMATIONS
INFORMATION
I: polyphone: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/polyphone dONt don't
Regards
Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http:
Hi Matt,
On 09/11/13 02:36, Matt Flax wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I have now fixed this problem and uploaded the source code to sf.net,
> the new release file name is :
> gtkiostream-1.3.0.fixedDeb.tar.gz
>
> Attatched is the diff between the original source release and the one on
> sf.net.
>
> Than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Matt,
Re: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2013/11/msg00068.html
I have just attempted the build again and it fails in the same place
as before, with the same error.
This is using a fully updated Debian sid chroot.
Regards
Daniel
-BEG
sion 1.3.0-1, arch
source) ...
W: gtkiostream source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends gtkiostream-doc
I: gtkiostream source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
Regards
Daniel Lintott
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/sponsors
[2] http://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto/gtkiostream
[3] https://wiki.debian.
u bug with (LP: #XXX), but
should I also file the bug report in Debian and close that as well?
Regards
Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSeQNbAAoJEMw/9yOWzAkJjicH/Rnaj+9L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 24/10/13 21:52, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> [...] I believe it's a wrong approach. You shouldn't install
> anything under /usr/local unless absolutely required. Previous
> versions of the package didn't do that; please try to do it the
> sam
[5d312bc7] Imported Upstream version 0.8.6
* [44fe48e3] [rules] Add DH_ALWAYS_EXCLUDE=Lang_it.ts.gz
* [117338f3] Update VCS Fields
-- Daniel Lintott Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:09:53 +0100
Regards,
Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: U
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
