Hi Philippe,
I've just tested your Jappix package from mentors
My testing is biased: I already had ejabberd running and I had already
used BOSH to integrate with the Candy chat client so my server was able
to run Jappix very quickly. It took me all of about 5 minutes to get it
going.
So far,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/07/13 18:02, Philippe Gauthier wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for testing the package. I am not a member of the upstream
developers, but they have been very responsive to our comments so far.
My testing is biased: I already had ejabberd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/05/13 02:56, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
Hi All
I posted a new tentative Debian package here:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/rfc5766-turn-server
I'd appreciate the feedback.
I've been very busy lately but I've been trying to help
Hi all,
I've had a few discussions with people about the git workflow for packaging.
I've now made a diagram about this that may be useful for people, it is
relevant to autotools projects in particular:
http://danielpocock.com/autotools-project-distribution-and-packaging-on-debian
Please let
On 04/04/13 10:07, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 04/04/2013 09:55, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Hi all,
I've had a few discussions with people about the git workflow for packaging.
I've now made a diagram about this that may be useful for people, it is
relevant to autotools projects in particular:
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/02/13 09:09, Markus Wanner wrote:
Anton,
that's very useful feedback, thanks a lot. I figured I run lintian
from wheezy, that's why I didn't notice most of this.
On 02/23/2013 08:02 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
as I understood from
Hi Bart,
It can be removed from mentors - I got an automated email telling me
that 684481 is tagged pending, I didn't realise I have to manage the
other bugs manually
Regards,
Daniel
On 22/11/12 08:28, Bart Martens wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I see that turnserver 0.7.2-1 is in NEW, but you are
, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/sylkserver
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sylkserver/sylkserver_2.1.1-1.dsc
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
-BEGIN PGP
and the related packages are based on artifacts created by
upstream for their unofficial Debian packages. I have done some basic
adaption (e.g. to DEP-5 copyright), but otherwise I have used the
material from upstream.
* Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au, 2012-10-03, 12:23:
http://mentors.debian.net
, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-eventlib/python-eventlib_0.1.0-1.dsc
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-xcaplib/python-xcaplib_1.0.17-1.dsc
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-msrplib/python-msrplib_0.15.0-1.dsc
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server issue?
$ dput mentors turnserver_0.6-1_amd64.changesChecking signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made Sun 30 Sep 2012 10:32:53 UTC using RSA key ID 69D5AA83
gpg: Good signature from Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
gpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/12 13:26, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 01:12:38PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server
issue?
There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on the mentors incoming queue
On 14/08/12 10:58, Boris Pek wrote:
Hi,
turnserver - server for ICE/STUN/TURN, NAT traversal for SIP and Jabber
Have you asked Debian VoIP Team [1]? They might be interested in this package.
Yes, I shared it on the pkg-voip list on Friday, no response so far
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/turnserver/turnserver_0.6-1.dsc
More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ
On 10/08/12 21:43, Andrew Shadura wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:01:52 +
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
* Package name: turnserver
More information about hello can be obtained from
http://www.example.com.
Oh, really? :)
Actually, I just put up a new
I've recently registered an ITP for SylkServer and it's dependencies:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682698
Upstream:
http://sylkserver.com/
Notable features:
* Both SIP and Jabber are supported
* It is a standalone application server (e.g. conferencing server), so
On 25/05/12 13:23, Victor Seva wrote:
Hi Daniel,
2012/5/25 Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au:
I can see some things very quickly:
debian/control, build-depends:
you need: debhelper (= 9.0.0)
and maybe: Standards-Version: 3.9.3
debian/compat
must be 9 (not 8)
debian
On 21/05/12 21:42, Andy Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
In article 4fbab097.7080...@trendhosting.net,
I wonder if that is justification to make a lintian-override for that
warning?
If someone else can confirm that's the cause, then yes.
I've just gone ahead and added the override - there is a
On 22/05/12 09:57, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-05-21 17:38, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 21/05/12 10:02, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
[...]
- - make a lintian override to suppress the warning, with a comment to
explain I am using -release deliberately for resiprocate?
I'm not sure you want to keep
On 22/05/12 11:03, Gergely Nagy wrote:
noowner 669373
tag 669373 - pending
thanks
Andy Hawkins a...@gently.org.uk writes:
Gergely, Daniel has uploaded new packages for flactag (2.0.2-1) and
libmusicbrainz5 (5.0.1-1). Are you still considering sponsoring flactag?
Would you also consider
http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
I got a lintian warning
postinst-does-not-load-confmodule
so I added a line to source the module:
#!/bin/sh
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
set -e
into my repro.postinst file
Now, the postinst hangs and doesn't return to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/05/12 06:57, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:59:02PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
My package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
The warning:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dev-pkg-without-shlib
http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
I added the following to debian/rules:
DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk
During the build, I notice the *FLAGS values appear to be set, e.g.
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX
On 21/05/12 10:02, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:03:09AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
b) I notice the verbose output (on the mentors summary page)
shows an SONAME in a slightly different format:
usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so
Notice: librutil-1.8
On 21/05/12 16:22, Arno Töll wrote:
On 21.05.2012 17:02, Daniel Pocock wrote:
After building, I check the binaries, it seems to think they were
hardened, but some intermittent issues with `Fortify Source functions'
and lintian (on mentors) complains
The hardening-check tool (which is used
lintian gives none of the new errors, but I still see them on mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
this was discussed on debian-mentors today - some lintian warnings are
not 100% reliable
Bart, can you give us any other tips about these errors? Have I done
the right
On 21/05/12 19:35, Andy Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:26:43PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
this was discussed on debian-mentors today - some lintian warnings are
not 100% reliable
Yeah, I've been following that.
$ hardening-check flactag
flactag:
Position Independent
On 21/05/12 19:35, Andy Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:26:43PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
this was discussed on debian-mentors today - some lintian warnings are
not 100% reliable
Yeah, I've been following that.
$ hardening-check flactag
flactag:
Position Independent
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dlz-ldap-enum
* Package name: dlz-ldap-enum
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
* URL : https://github.com/opentelecoms
On 14/05/12 15:49, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:57:42AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
I'd rather see a correlation to the fact that some members
There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and libmusicbrainz
libmusicbrainz SONAMEs have a colourful history and this is reflected in
the way previous versions have been packaged
e.g.
SONAME = libmusicbrainz3.so.6
v2.1.x (currently in Debian, src pkg = libmusicbrainz-2.1)
Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +, Andy Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
In article 4fb20730.1090...@pocock.com.au,
Daniel Pocockdan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and
libmusicbrainz
Andy Hawkins a...@gently.org.uk wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I agree that this is valid and that these libs/pkgs can co-exist
My preference would be for the soname libmusicbrainz.so.5, is there
any
outright reason to avoid the other way of doing
On 13/05/12 14:09, Andy Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
In article 4fae92f8.4070...@pocock.com.au,
Daniel Pocockdan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
Both Debian packages are called libmusicbrainz4, yet
OLD: code v2.1.x, SONAME = libmusicbrainz.so.4, ABI = 4
NEW: code v4.0.x, SONAME =
I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Is wheezy now frozen already? Are people just wasting their time
preparing packages that are going to be passed over?
There is no official statement about this on the mentors site
On 12/05/12 10:07, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Freezes and NEW are mostly unrelated.
Can you elaborate on that a little? The link
On 12/05/12 14:49, Andy Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
In article 8762c2qyan@luthien.mhp,
Gergely Nagyalger...@madhouse-project.org wrote:
Shouldn't the new one be named libmusicbranz4-3 then? Because if the ABI
gets bumped to 4, then we'll have libmusicbrainz4.so.4, but it's a
On 12/05/12 15:59, Andy Hawkins wrote:
Hi.
In article 4fae801d.2010...@pocock.com.au,
Daniel Pocockdan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
Does the -dev package need the ABI number in the name?
If it does, then there isn't an issue. The dev will me libmb4-3-dev.
libmusicbrainz-dev -
On 07/05/12 13:53, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 07/05/2012 15:41, Olе Streicher wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am the maintainer of the package cpl. Upstream just released a new
version 6.0 and changed the SONAME for the built libraries from 12 to
20. So, the source now builds a package libcplcore20 instead
On 10/04/12 11:34, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:35:18AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 09/04/12 10:41, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Hi,
I've recently filed an RFS for reSIProcate
http://lists.debian.org
On 01/05/12 20:24, Andy Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
In article 87d36nrivz@luthien.mhp,
Gergely Nagyalger...@madhouse-project.org wrote:
Nope, didn't have a chance yet. Today or tomorrow I will have a little
time and see what I can do. I'll investigate the libmb4 status too.
Ok,
ftpmasters have asked me to repackage the simpleid upstream tarball as per
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-origtargz
However, I already have it in git-buildpackage, and the instructions
tell me I should have repackaged before running
I've read the package tutorials several times, but I'm having trouble
finding out how to create a new user during the install (I don't want
the daemon to run as root).
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Two suggestions:
a) think about what type of user you want:
flactag can be obtained from
http://flactag.sourceforge.net
NOTE:
The preparation of the new upstream releases of these packages and the
building of the Debian packages has been a collaborative effort between
myself, Andy Hawkins and Timo Aaltonen
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
I have a big collection of whole-album flacs, and would like to see this
package in Debian, so I'll do a review and handle the upload (once
blocking issues - if any - are fixed, of course).
Great - thanks for the prompt reply
Andy and I are lurking about in #flactag on irc.freenode.net
On 19/04/12 20:41, Nicholas Breen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 03:07:51PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
flactag- Tagger for whole-album FLAC files using data from
MusicBrainz
This is closing a fairly old (2008) ITP, so it might be good to re-evaluate
other software in the same
On 09/04/12 10:41, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Hi,
I've recently filed an RFS for reSIProcate
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/04/msg00168.html
I didn't yet try to build it, but at first glance the packaging
On 09/04/12 14:19, Werner Detter wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for instructions on how to create a debian package that uses
cmake as build
system as I'm wondering how the debian/rules should look and what it should
contain for
cmake? Can anyone tell me a small package that uses cmake as
On 09/04/12 16:37, Werner Detter wrote:
Hi,
cdbs makes it very easy
http://build-common.alioth.debian.org/cdbs-doc.html#id2561559
I've decided to go with cdbs now, my debian/rules looks now like:
#!/usr/bin/make -f
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
include
tarball. I am keen to
get feedback on any further effort needed on the upstream build system
before the official tarball is made up. The packages on mentors are not
currently intended for unstable, they may suit the Debian experimental
catalog.
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dynalogin/dynalogin_0.9.11-2.dsc
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/simpleid/simpleid_0.8.1-5.dsc
This is the first upload of this package.
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
I am involved in several projects where I am either the founder of the
project (e.g. dynalogin) or a contributor with full access to the
repository (e.g. Ganglia, reSIProcate, flactag)
There are also a couple of projects where I don't have any role, but I
would like to package the code
a) for those projects where I have no role, no commit rights, etc, I presume
that I should just use git-buildpackage, create a distinct repository to
track debian/ stuff, and follow the normal structure (master and upstream
branches)
The use of a VCS is completely optional for Debian
On 28/03/2012 13:29, Michael Wild wrote:
On 03/28/2012 01:56 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
[...]
All the above is completely up to you as maintainer of the Debian packaging.
The only unpleasant side-effect I can think of is that git-dch will
probably be a bit noisy.
Haven't tried such a scheme
1) Having found a bug report that i would like to work on
- Which is the source file i download? the orig or the dsc? the
debian one or the upstream one?
Just do this:
apt-get source package-name
- Do i need to contact first the maintainer of the package that i
intend to work on
Some time ago I started a discussion about packaging issues on the
ActiveMQ-CPP mailing list.
Some specific issues (i.e. libtool configuration) were identified and a
JIRA case opened.
Would anyone here be able to comment on the proposed solution? Is there
anything else that could be done to
59 matches
Mail list logo
