-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/07/13 18:02, Philippe Gauthier wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for testing the package. I am not a member of the upstream
> developers, but they have been very responsive to our comments so far.
>> My testing is biased: I already had ejabberd r
Hi Philippe,
I've just tested your Jappix package from mentors
My testing is biased: I already had ejabberd running and I had already
used BOSH to integrate with the Candy chat client so my server was able
to run Jappix very quickly. It took me all of about 5 minutes to get it
going.
So far,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/05/13 02:56, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I posted a new tentative Debian package here:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/rfc5766-turn-server
>
> I'd appreciate the feedback.
I've been very busy lately but I've been trying to he
On 04/04/13 10:07, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 04/04/2013 09:55, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've had a few discussions with people about the git workflow for packaging.
>>
>> I've now made a diagram about this that may be useful for people,
Hi all,
I've had a few discussions with people about the git workflow for packaging.
I've now made a diagram about this that may be useful for people, it is
relevant to autotools projects in particular:
http://danielpocock.com/autotools-project-distribution-and-packaging-on-debian
Please let m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/02/13 09:09, Markus Wanner wrote:
> Anton,
>
> that's very useful feedback, thanks a lot. I figured I run lintian
> from wheezy, that's why I didn't notice most of this.
>
> On 02/23/2013 08:02 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> as I understood fr
Hi Bart,
It can be removed from mentors - I got an automated email telling me
that 684481 is tagged pending, I didn't realise I have to manage the
other bugs manually
Regards,
Daniel
On 22/11/12 08:28, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I see that turnserver 0.7.2-1 is in NEW, but you ar
about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/sylkserver
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sylkserver/sylkserver_2.1.1-1.dsc
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
is package and the related packages are based on artifacts created by
upstream for their unofficial Debian packages. I have done some basic
adaption (e.g. to DEP-5 copyright), but otherwise I have used the
material from upstream.
> * Daniel Pocock , 2012-10-03, 12:23:
>> http://mentors.de
ernatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-msrplib/python-msrplib_0.15.0-1.dsc
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
on-xcaplib
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-xcaplib/python-xcaplib_1.0.17-1.dsc
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
ernatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-eventlib/python-eventlib_0.1.0-1.dsc
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/12 13:26, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 01:12:38PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server
>> issue?
> There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on th
Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server issue?
$ dput mentors turnserver_0.6-1_amd64.changesChecking signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made Sun 30 Sep 2012 10:32:53 UTC using RSA key ID 69D5AA83
gpg: Good signature from "Daniel Pocock "
gpg:
On 14/08/12 10:58, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> turnserver - server for ICE/STUN/TURN, NAT traversal for SIP and Jabber
>
> Have you asked Debian VoIP Team [1]? They might be interested in this package.
>
Yes, I shared it on the pkg-voip list on Friday, no response so far
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 10/08/12 21:43, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:01:52 +
> Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> * Package name: turnserver
>
>> More information about hello can be obtained from
>> http://www.example.com.
>
> Oh, really?
y, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/turnserver/turnserver_0.6-1.dsc
More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-me
I've recently registered an ITP for SylkServer and it's dependencies:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682698
Upstream:
http://sylkserver.com/
Notable features:
* Both SIP and Jabber are supported
* It is a standalone application server (e.g. conferencing server), so
it
On 25/05/12 13:23, Victor Seva wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> 2012/5/25 Daniel Pocock :
>> I can see some things very quickly:
>>
>> debian/control, build-depends:
>> you need: debhelper (>= 9.0.0)
>> and maybe: Standards-Version: 3.9.3
>>
>
makes it very easy for people to evaluate them
and give more feedback.
On 25/05/12 12:29, Victor Seva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/5/25 Daniel Pocock :
>> I notice there has been some attempts to package Kamailio for Debian:
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-voip/kamailio/trunk/d
Thanks to all the people who've provided feedback about my packaging
efforts, particularly on reSIProcate
http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
I've tried to do all the right things by the policies, etc, but given
the nature of the package, it is like trying to fit a square peg into a
http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
I got a lintian warning
postinst-does-not-load-confmodule
so I added a line to source the module:
#!/bin/sh
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
set -e
into my repro.postinst file
Now, the postinst hangs and doesn't return to the prompt
On 22/05/12 11:03, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> noowner 669373
> tag 669373 - pending
> thanks
>
> Andy Hawkins writes:
>
>> Gergely, Daniel has uploaded new packages for flactag (2.0.2-1) and
>> libmusicbrainz5 (5.0.1-1). Are you still considering sponsoring flactag?
>> Would you also consider sponsor
On 22/05/12 09:57, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-05-21 17:38, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 21/05/12 10:02, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> - - make a lintian override to suppress the warning, with a comment to
>>>> explain I am using -release deli
On 21/05/12 21:42, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <4fbab097.7080...@trendhosting.net>,
>> I wonder if that is justification to make a lintian-override for that
>> warning?
>
> If someone else can confirm that's the cause, then yes.
>
I've just gone ahead and added the override - there
On 21/05/12 19:35, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:26:43PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> this was discussed on debian-mentors today - some lintian warnings are
>> not 100% reliable
>
> Yeah, I've been following that.
>
>
On 21/05/12 19:35, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:26:43PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> this was discussed on debian-mentors today - some lintian warnings are
>> not 100% reliable
>
> Yeah, I've been following that.
>
>
> lintian gives none of the new errors, but I still see them on mentors:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
this was discussed on debian-mentors today - some lintian warnings are
not 100% reliable
> Bart, can you give us any other tips about these errors? Have I done
> the righ
On 21/05/12 16:22, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 21.05.2012 17:02, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> After building, I check the binaries, it seems to think they were
>> hardened, but some intermittent issues with `Fortify Source functions'
>> and lintian (on mentors) complains
>
>
On 21/05/12 10:02, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:03:09AM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>> b) I notice the verbose output (on the mentors summary page)
>>>> shows an SONAME in a slightly different format:
>>>>
>>>> us
http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
I added the following to debian/rules:
DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk
During the build, I notice the *FLAGS values appear to be set, e.g.
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/05/12 06:57, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:59:02PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>> My package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
>>
>> The warning:
>> http://lintia
My package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
The warning:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink.html
a) I notice the warning is appearing for the lib package and NOT the
-dev package itself
b) I notice the verbose output (on the mentors summary page) shows an
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dlz-ldap-enum"
* Package name: dlz-ldap-enum
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Daniel Pocock
* URL : https://github.com/opentelecoms-org/dlz
Andy Hawkins wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I agree that this is valid and that these libs/pkgs can co-exist
>
>> My preference would be for the soname libmusicbrainz.so.5, is there
>any
>> outright reason to av
Mike Hommey wrote:
>On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +, Andy Hawkins wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In article <4fb20730.1090...@pocock.com.au>,
>>Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> > There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and
>li
There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and libmusicbrainz
libmusicbrainz SONAMEs have a colourful history and this is reflected in
the way previous versions have been packaged
e.g.
SONAME = libmusicbrainz3.so.6
v2.1.x (currently in Debian, src pkg = libmusicbrainz-2.1) SONA
On 14/05/12 15:49, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:57:42AM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
>>
>>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>>
> I'd rather s
On 13/05/12 14:09, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <4fae92f8.4070...@pocock.com.au>,
> Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> "Both Debian packages are called libmusicbrainz4, yet
>> OLD: code v2.1.x, SONAME = libmusicbrainz.so.4, ABI = 4
>> N
On 12/05/12 15:59, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi.
> In article <4fae801d.2010...@pocock.com.au>,
> Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Does the -dev package need the ABI number in the name?
>
> If it does, then there isn't an issue. The dev will me libmb4-3-dev.
>
On 12/05/12 14:49, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <8762c2qyan@luthien.mhp>,
>Gergely Nagy wrote:
>> Shouldn't the new one be named libmusicbranz4-3 then? Because if the ABI
>> gets bumped to 4, then we'll have libmusicbrainz4.so.4, but it's a
>> different library than 4.s
On 12/05/12 10:07, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
>>
>> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>
> Freezes and NEW are mostly unrelated.
>
C
I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Is wheezy now frozen already? Are people just wasting their time
preparing packages that are going to be passed over?
There is no official statement about this on the mentors site o
On 07/05/12 13:53, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 15:41, Olе Streicher wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am the maintainer of the package "cpl". Upstream just released a new
>> version 6.0 and changed the SONAME for the built libraries from 12 to
>> 20. So, the source now builds a package "libcplc
On 10/04/12 11:34, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:35:18AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/04/12 10:41, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
On 01/05/12 20:24, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <87d36nrivz@luthien.mhp>,
>Gergely Nagy wrote:
>> Nope, didn't have a chance yet. Today or tomorrow I will have a little
>> time and see what I can do. I'll investigate the libmb4 status too.
>
> Ok, thanks for that.
>
ftpmasters have asked me to repackage the simpleid upstream tarball as per
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-origtargz
However, I already have it in git-buildpackage, and the instructions
tell me I should have repackaged before running git-impo
> I've read the package tutorials several times, but I'm having trouble
> finding out how to create a new user during the install (I don't want
> the daemon to run as root).
>
> Can someone point me in the right direction?
Two suggestions:
a) think about what type of user you want:
http://www.
On 19/04/12 20:41, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 03:07:51PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> flactag- Tagger for whole-album FLAC files using data from
>> MusicBrainz
>
> This is closing a fairly old (2008) ITP, so it might be good to re-evaluate
&g
> I have a big collection of whole-album flacs, and would like to see this
> package in Debian, so I'll do a review and handle the upload (once
> blocking issues - if any - are fixed, of course).
>
Great - thanks for the prompt reply
Andy and I are lurking about in #flactag on irc.freenode.ne
tag can be obtained from
http://flactag.sourceforge.net
NOTE:
The preparation of the new upstream releases of these packages and the
building of the Debian packages has been a collaborative effort between
myself, Andy Hawkins and Timo Aaltonen
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On 09/04/12 16:37, Werner Detter wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> cdbs makes it very easy
>>
>> http://build-common.alioth.debian.org/cdbs-doc.html#id2561559
>
> I've decided to go with cdbs now, my debian/rules looks now like:
>
> #!/usr/bin/make -f
> include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
> include /
On 09/04/12 14:19, Werner Detter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for instructions on how to create a debian package that uses
> cmake as build
> system as I'm wondering how the debian/rules should look and what it should
> contain for
> cmake? Can anyone tell me a small package that uses cmake a
On 09/04/12 10:41, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've recently filed an RFS for reSIProcate
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/04/msg00
unofficial tarball. I am keen to
get feedback on any further effort needed on the upstream build system
before the official tarball is made up. The packages on mentors are not
currently intended for unstable, they may suit the Debian experimental
catalog.
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To U
ckage with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/simpleid/simpleid_0.8.1-5.dsc
This is the first upload of this package.
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dynalogin/dynalogin_0.9.11-2.dsc
Regards,
Daniel Pocock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
On 28/03/2012 13:29, Michael Wild wrote:
On 03/28/2012 01:56 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
[...]
All the above is completely up to you as maintainer of the Debian packaging.
The only unpleasant side-effect I can think of is that git-dch will
probably be a bit noisy.
Haven't tried such a scheme mysel
a) for those projects where I have no role, no commit rights, etc, I presume
that I should just use git-buildpackage, create a distinct repository to
track debian/ stuff, and follow the normal structure (master and upstream
branches)
The use of a VCS is completely optional for Debian packaging
I am involved in several projects where I am either the founder of the
project (e.g. dynalogin) or a contributor with full access to the
repository (e.g. Ganglia, reSIProcate, flactag)
There are also a couple of projects where I don't have any role, but I
would like to package the code for
> 1) Having found a bug report that i would like to work on
> - Which is the source file i download? the orig or the dsc? the
> debian one or the upstream one?
Just do this:
apt-get source package-name
> - Do i need to contact first the maintainer of the package that i
> intend to work
Some time ago I started a discussion about packaging issues on the
ActiveMQ-CPP mailing list.
Some specific issues (i.e. libtool configuration) were identified and a
JIRA case opened.
Would anyone here be able to comment on the proposed solution? Is there
anything else that could be done to m
62 matches
Mail list logo
