re: sponsor for kernel-patch-ck

2002-10-27 Thread David Kimdon
Hi Graham, I would be happy to sponsor kernel-patch-ck. I have taken a look at it and it is well done. Is there anything you want to update before I upload it? -David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

re: fixed some RC bugs, need sponsor

2002-10-27 Thread David Kimdon
Hi, Yay! Bug squashing ! :-) For both package, please take a looks at : http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu-guidelines specifically the version numbering section and the changelog entry section. For fortunes-it the source package is wrong, there should be a

Re: fixed some RC bugs, need sponsor

2002-10-27 Thread David Kimdon
Hi, Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:17:46PM +0100 wrote: ok, read and done proper changes. good deal. For fortunes-it the source package is wrong, there should be a orig i've fixed that, using dpkg-source -b dir dir.orig. please check if it's correct now. Take a look at

re: sponsor for kernel-patch-ck

2002-10-27 Thread David Kimdon
Hi Graham, I would be happy to sponsor kernel-patch-ck. I have taken a look at it and it is well done. Is there anything you want to update before I upload it? -David

re: fixed some RC bugs, need sponsor

2002-10-27 Thread David Kimdon
Hi, Yay! Bug squashing ! :-) For both package, please take a looks at : http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu-guidelines specifically the version numbering section and the changelog entry section. For fortunes-it the source package is wrong, there should be a

Re: fixed some RC bugs, need sponsor

2002-10-27 Thread David Kimdon
Hi, Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:17:46PM +0100 wrote: ok, read and done proper changes. good deal. For fortunes-it the source package is wrong, there should be a orig i've fixed that, using dpkg-source -b dir dir.orig. please check if it's correct now. Take a look at

libdb3-3.3.11, subversion server

2001-10-09 Thread David Kimdon
Hi, I'm working on packaging subversion, a compelling replacement for cvs. The subversion server needs the Berkeley Database version 3.3.11, the current version in unstable is 3.2.9. I've build 3.3.11-1 based on patches in the BTS (#109853). The differences betwene 3.2.x and 3.3.x require a

libdb3-3.3.11, subversion server

2001-10-09 Thread David Kimdon
Hi, I'm working on packaging subversion, a compelling replacement for cvs. The subversion server needs the Berkeley Database version 3.3.11, the current version in unstable is 3.2.9. I've build 3.3.11-1 based on patches in the BTS (#109853). The differences betwene 3.2.x and 3.3.x require a