Re: Sponsor request for hunspell-uz

2006-09-19 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 19/09/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting your site: > > "A Debian native package is a package that is specific to Debian, and > would not be of interest to say Fedora. Godd examples are dpkg and apt > tools." > > Actually, apt and dpkg are used by at least one project outsid

Re: Homepage in debian/control (was: RFS: queuegraph (take two))

2006-09-01 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 31/08/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: also sprach Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1639 +0200]: > Please no, as tools will start to use X-Homepage, you will have to > keep compatibility for long time. And if tools won't use it, it > makes no use to include it in debi

Re: How to register manpages?

2006-09-01 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 31/08/06, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But unfortunatly it can not rename files while using dh_install and I like to see a dh_installpo like the dh_installman which put the .CC.N in the right CountryCode section... So, if dh_installpo can do this with the CC.po ... .po files

Re: How to register manpages?

2006-08-30 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 28/08/06, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I have for all of my tools/packages manpages (de and fr too) and using dh_installman wich works perfectly. Now I have read I must register manpages from the "postinst" script. How can this be done? All Debian packages I have chec

Re: RFS: wormux (backported package)

2006-08-12 Thread Eddy Petrişor
Please read wiki.debian.org/Backports, there are several things which are not ok for an inclusion to bpo (unstable instead of testing, wrong versioning etc). Jean, you should undo thosse changes related to standards version: "Do not lower the standards version, that's just useless." I wanted to

Re: Packaging non-compiled files

2006-08-02 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 02/08/06, Kit Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I asked a similar question on debian-user, and was recommended to come here instead. At my job, we would like to use apt to distribute certain packages, such as WWW applications written in PHP, to certain other of our machines. The way I had be

Fwd: "Glest ITP is RFP" or "I will be disconnected for an undefinite period of time"

2006-07-27 Thread Eddy Petrişor
: Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 27-Jul-2006 15:00 Subject: Re: "Glest ITP is RFP" or "I will be disconnected for an undefinite period of time" To: debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org Am Donnerstag 27 Juli 2006 13:15 schrieb Eddy Petrişor: On 27/07/06, Reinhard Tartler

Re: plea to sponsees about announcing location of packages

2006-07-27 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 27/07/06, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:28, martin f krafft took the opportunity to write: > also sprach Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.27.1124 +0100]: > > > Or just dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main//pkg.dsc > > > > >

Re: RFS: min12xxw

2006-07-21 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 21/07/06, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Minor point: You mention the homepage in the package desciption, but not as the developer reference recommends [1]. It would be nice, if you could fix that with the next version. Said Alexander on a „fix Homepage: semiheader URLs" ramp

Re: contribution in Debian,

2006-07-21 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 21/07/06, Deepak Kumar Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Mentors, First, do not use HTML/RichText/Doc email on Debian lists. I am Deepak and I asked this question many times that how will start contribution in Debian (particularly in perl or python / ruby area). But I have

Re: BTS question: how to mark bug if fix needs library update?

2006-06-30 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 30/06/06, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, until new B is packaged to debian, it blocks marking bug 123456 in > A done. How should this be handled in BTS system? Should the bug be > reassigned to package B? File a bug against library B requesting that the new upstream release be pa

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eddy Petrişor wrote: >> ? I didn't say to do that. Patching the Makefiles used by autotools >> before cdbs runs was my point. > > Err, yes, my bad, indeed, you did not say that. OK, I see the problem. I'

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eddy Petrişor wrote: > On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All this is quite a lot of automake patching and if you can get upstream >> onside it will be a lot easier. > > Running autotools i

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi. > > How implement conditions following? > > 1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo >source package > 2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon > 3)

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. How implement conditions following? 1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo source package 2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon 3) debian/control contains libfoo0 (

Re: How to correctly patch without cdbs?

2006-06-19 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/19/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/19/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm sure I'm not doing it correctly. How do you correctly apply .patch > > files without cdbs? > At this point you should probably learn to use d

Re: How to correctly patch without cdbs?

2006-06-19 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/19/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm sure I'm not doing it correctly. How do you correctly apply .patch > files without cdbs? At this point you should probably learn to use dpkg v2 source archives, which allow patches without "third party" patch applying code (and build dep

Re: Homepage-field in description

2006-06-15 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/15/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is a point, but still the users might find the link useful. > Also, checking if something fresher is present is in upstream could > be facilitated because there is no need to look for the copyright > file and ge the info from there. Thi

Re: Homepage-field in description

2006-06-14 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/15/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Eddy Petrişor wrote: > Think about somebody wanting to NMU because a bug has a fix in > upstream and the current mainatiner is too busy or MIA. How > difficult is it to get to the upstream? Is REALLY hard

Re: Homepage-field in description

2006-06-14 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/15/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Policy does not talk about URLs, it just explains what the extra space is for. It matters if you have http://www.my.real.long.and.cool.domain.name.that.i.so.love.net/all/my/projects/package/html/ C'mon, how often does that happen? 1 in

Re: Homepage-field in description

2006-06-14 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/15/06, Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:11:32AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I don't think any part of packages (description or separate field) are > the correct place for the Homepage field. Yes, that's because it's an unneeded duplication of what's already

Re: I can translate

2006-06-14 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/13/06, DusteD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, i would like to help the debian project if there is any need for a english > danish translator. Where do i go from here ? You should subscribe to the debian-l10n-danish list[1] and present yourself/ask for more info there. [1] http://lists.deb

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-06 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/6/06, Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Vedran Furaè <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What if I receive a bugreport which I don't know how to solve? For > example, a FTBFS on some "exotic architecture"? For this specific example, you should look for appropriate mailing-lists (the porter

Re: RFS: hearts-0.1-1 -- The classic Hearts card game for the GNOME desktop

2006-06-05 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/5/06, Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I am the developer of Hearts for GNOME (http://www.gnome-hearts.org) and I just packaged the upcoming 0.1 release for Debian. I am looking for a sponsor who is willing to check and upload the package for me. You could take care of th

Re: [RFS] wormux - A funny fight game on 2D maps

2006-06-03 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/3/06, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Salut, Jean... On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Jean Parpaillon wrote: > Fixed it. When I "cleaned" calls to dh_* scripts, I removed > dh_shlibdeps... Shame on me ;-) > > New version is 0.7.2-3. Yes, this one looks good. I had upload

Re: Adding an application to the menu

2006-06-01 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/1/06, Indraveni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am creating a deb package which will install some type of converter into the system and it is working fine. NOW..I want to add an entry into the Applcaitions/Office menu of my debian system for that particular application which is inst

Re: [OT?] debmirror does not add index files

2006-05-25 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 5/24/06, Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060524 15:21]: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Try using http. Or try reprepro instead. I'm considering orphaning > > debmirror in favour of reprepro. > > does reprepro support 'real' mirroring of Pa

Re: [OT?] debmirror does not add index files

2006-05-24 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 5/24/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ""=?UTF-8?Q?Eddy_Petri=C5=9For?="" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello all, > > I don't know if this is the best place to ask this question, but I > suppose I will get some pointers (I suspect -devel to be a better > place, but I might

[OT?] debmirror does not add index files

2006-05-24 Thread Eddy Petrişor
Hello all, I don't know if this is the best place to ask this question, but I suppose I will get some pointers (I suspect -devel to be a better place, but I might be missing something due to my lack of knowledge, thus my choice). I started creating a local mirror via debmirror sometime ago and t

Re: RFS: gnome-ppp 0.3.23-1

2006-05-19 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 5/19/06, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Zak, > I'm looking for a sponsor for the `gnome-ppp' package. I got to ITA it > around 10 days ago,[0] due to my touching it for Ubuntu, and I noticed > that it needed a new developer to love it =) > [1] http://mentors.debian.net/de

Re: [RFS] wormux - A funny fight game on 2D maps

2006-05-18 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 5/18/06, John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: like getting Etch out the door before 2012, for example[1] [1] Sorry, couldn't resist that one. :P Doing that will get you fishslapped by the release managers and people caring about etch. ;-) Seriousely, I have much faith in Andy, Steve

Re: [RFS] wormux - A funny fight game on 2D maps

2006-05-18 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 5/18/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - use wormux.install and wormux-data.install files instead of > "dh_install -pwormux" and "dh_install -pwormux-data". > Matter of taste though. > Data files from upstream is moving really often and is much more simpler for me to use the method

Re: [RFS] wormux - A funny fight game on 2D maps

2006-05-18 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 5/17/06, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - check the Standards version (lintian warning) - linda warning: wormux; The font wormux-0.7.1/data/font/DejaVuSans.ttf in package ttf-dejavu is considered to be a duplicate. Isn't that _only_ in the source package? -- Regards, EddyP ==

Re: How can I simply test building a package with a different compiler version?

2006-05-04 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 5/5/06, Fabian Guter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi! > So to summarize, using `make CXX=g++-4.1' should do. OK, that looks simple! But how about passing parameters to make when using svn-buildpackage. I looked into the documentation (also of dpkg-buildbackage) but didn't find anything helpful

Re: A list of common gotchas in Debian packaging

2006-05-04 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 5/4/06, Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some issues seem to come up time and again when somebody inspects RFS'd packages. Some of these are not breaches of policy but simply bad practices, like leaving quoted dh_* commands in debian/rules. Some are breaches of policy but common e

Re: Wormux 0.7.1-1

2006-04-26 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/26/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I have released a new version of the game wormux. The package source has > been updated to handle this new release. Can anybody test this version > and adopt the package ? > The 0.7.1 release is here: > http://download.gna.org/wormux/wormu

Re: Linda warnings about manpages in my packages

2006-04-20 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/20/06, Marco Bertorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folk, > > I've three packages: > > denyhosts-python2.3 > denyhosts-python2.4 > denyhosts-common > > the binaries are stored in packages -python2.X but the manpage (common > to alla packages) is stored in denyhosts-common. > > E: denyhost

Re: Wormux package

2006-04-14 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/12/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 11.04.2006 19:07, Eddy Petrişor a écrit : > > >>I'm asking to the core team if they wants to release another version, > >>like 0.7.1. > >But my point was to fix the issues in the upstream repository ;-

Re: Problem with debuild and changelog

2006-04-13 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/12/06, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gruesse! > * Eddy Petri?or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am [12.04.06 17:39]: > > > > > > Then i run autogen.sh which builds a changelog from the above template. > > > Or i > > > create a new with dch --create foo bar > > > > autogen does not h

Re: Problem with debuild and changelog

2006-04-12 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/12/06, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > First posting and > i need a little help from friends;-) > > I have a package which is almost "debian ready", the debian dir exist > and necessary files in there. > > But there is no changelog, only a changelog.in as a template. th

Re: hard-to-reach upstream. looking for advice

2006-04-12 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/12/06, Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear DDs and DPMs (Debian Package Maintainers who might not be a DD) > > The problem is really is that original upstream author is hard (if > possible at all to reach) -- there is no official webpage since > mozilla.org rejected some recen

Re: Wormux package

2006-04-11 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/11/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 11.04.2006 02:45, Eddy Petrişor a écrit : > >On 4/11/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Could you please fix the (upstream) issues I have reported[1][2] and > >commit the updated ro.po file in the repo

Re: Wormux package

2006-04-10 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/11/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I recently asked for the adoption a new game named Wormux. > I fixed most of the issues people have found after I posted the mail. I > think you can reasonably test the package again. I gave too the address > of the upstream package on my pers

Re: Adopt new package Wormux

2006-04-07 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/7/06, Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Bernhard R. Link schrieb: > > >>http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7-1.dsc > >>http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7.orig.tar.gz > >>http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7-1.diff.gz > > > The md5sum of th

Re: gaim-snapshot (possible) newbie question

2006-03-14 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 3/14/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can anybody review (and hopefully upload) those? I have nor sponsors nor > > > advocates, by now. > > It may sound rude, but I hope all will say no. I don't think messing > > with an existing packa

Re: gaim-snapshot (possible) newbie question

2006-03-14 Thread Eddy Petrişor
> > Can anybody review (and hopefully upload) those? I have nor sponsors nor > > advocates, by now. > It may sound rude, but I hope all will say no. I don't think messing > with an existing package would be good; ask the gaim maintainer, > Robert McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about blessing. OK, we

Re: gaim-snapshot (possible) newbie question

2006-03-14 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 3/10/06, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It "Conflict"'s with gaim so that if you don't want gaim 1.5 removed you > > can just prevent gaim-snapshot from installing if you don't want it. > I don't think this is a good idea. You should remain with the gaim > package name, just

Re: RFS: multixterm -- drive multiple xterms separately or together

2006-03-08 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 3/7/06, gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 05:11:29PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > (shortening cc:-list) > > > > clusterssh opens xterms with ssh sessions, multixterm opens multiple > > > xterms (with whatever contents). So if you want to control several >

Re: Finding dependencies

2006-02-21 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 2/21/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > May I suggest: > grep -r "\s*#include\s\s<" . |sort -u I ment grep -r -e "\s*#include\s\s*<" . |sort -u -- Regards, EddyP = "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein

Re: Finding dependencies

2006-02-21 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 2/21/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One technique for finding these is to grep for > included headers, something like grep -r '^#include <' . |sort -u May I suggest: grep -r "\s*#include\s\s<" . |sort -u as it perfectly legal to place the includes at some whitespaces away from

Re: RFC: PyKaraoke

2006-02-17 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 2/16/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 07:45:50PM +0200, Eddy Petri?or wrote: > > On 2/14/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:53:48PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > > > I've split the package into two, as I said. I hav

Re: RFC: PyKaraoke

2006-02-16 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 2/14/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:53:48PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > I've split the package into two, as I said. I have a problem with lintian > > anyway, the manpage for all the programs is the same, with links. Thus, the > > gui program does not

Re: Debian Games Team

2006-01-13 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 1/13/06, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can ome packaging can be done for non-free games? > Seconded. This Debian user would be much better pleased by Debian's > efforts going to improving the packaging and coordination of free > software games. I agree that free software is the pr

Re: Debian Games Team

2006-01-12 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 1/13/06, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hello, > We've been recently talking about creating a group to maintain games in Debian > in a collaborative way. As a starting point, I've created a mailing list in > alioth for coordination, and also for create discussion threads about th

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2006-01-05 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 1/4/06, Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'll just try to restart the discussion with a proposal: > Currently I maintain one package (min12xxw, see [1]) for ubuntu, have filed an > ITP (#334093) in debian but haven't tried hard enough to find a sponsor yet. > > Since this packa

Re: changing profile

2005-11-07 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 11/7/05, Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > Let's say i would like a package to add some system-wide path to > /etc/profile. > > Is it possible to do this without writing postinst/postrm scripts that > actually write in that file ? Writting to that file will bring curses on yo

Re: Please take a look over aspell-ro_0.50-2-1

2005-10-18 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 10/18/05, Nicolai Ehemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > >>> get an ITP and insert it here > > > > > > not done yet, as I want to have the package fully prepared, then I > > want to upload it. > > I think you missed the sense of an ITP bug: it is

Re: Please take a look over aspell-ro_0.50-2-1

2005-10-18 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 10/5/05, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Re: Eddy Petrişor in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Could somebody take a look over it and tell me if I need to make any > >> changes before I list it

Please take a look over aspell-ro_0.50-2-1

2005-10-05 Thread Eddy Petrişor
Hello, I have packaged and released unofficially an aspell-ro package. I would like it to be uploaded as an official package, although the word database is really slim. Could somebody take a look over it and tell me if I need to make any changes before I list it on sponsors.d.n ? The package can

How can I modify /etc/inittab?

2005-09-09 Thread Eddy Petrişor
Hello, The application I want to package, qingy, is in fact a replacement for getty and it needs to modify /etc/inittab. Is it allowed for my package to do this automatically? Any idea how can I do this automatically? -- Regards, EddyP = "Imagination

Re: dh_shlibdeps in = warnings; dh_shlibdeps out = cyclic dependency on self

2005-09-09 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 9/7/05, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 07:59:29PM +0300, Eddy Petri?or wrote: > > On 9/6/05, Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Could someone else also comment on how applications should deal wi

Re: dh_shlibdeps in = warnings; dh_shlibdeps out = cyclic dependency on self

2005-09-07 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 9/6/05, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Could someone else also comment on how applications should deal with > > shared libraries which are not intended to be used by other programs? > > If they aren't used by other programs, there's no

dh_shlibdeps in = warnings; dh_shlibdeps out = cyclic dependency on self

2005-09-06 Thread Eddy Petrişor
Hello all, I am trying to package qingy (qingy.sf.net) for which there are 2 RFPs - 309672 and 236706 - in BTS for a looong time. I have tried it on my system and seems ok, although there seems to be some kind of race condition in the code resulting in a deadlock if the user changes the tty back

Re: RFS: Updated packages for vrms (fwd)

2005-08-26 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 8/26/05, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rogério Brito wrote: > > What exactly should I do? I would like to host this somewhere where > > others could have access to a svn repository. I think that I can > > register a new project on BerliOS, but suggestions are welcome. > > alioth.debian