-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Eddy Petrisor [Sat, 22 Jul 2006 15:07:17 +0300]:
>
>> If both packages come from the same source (as they should)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm packaging a simple library building a shared lib and a development
> package as usual. The -dev package depends on the one containing the
> shared library. Policy says that it is permitted in this situation to
> s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> Upon completing a piuparts run I get
> 7m19.8s ERROR: Package purging left files on system:
> /etc/xml
> /usr/share/applications
> owned by: gnome-terminal-data, gnome-menus, desktop-file-utils,
> capplets-d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vedran Furač wrote:
> Linda also
> complains with message:
> "A binary links against a library it does not use symbols from"
> Which library, which binary? I'm not sure what to do about that.
That is a linda bug
> - aspell-hr (The Croatian dictionary
On 8/19/05, Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:39:15PM -0400, Tyler Trafford wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:31:54PM -0400, skaller wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 09:19 +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > >
> > >> This site is still not viewable with firef
On 8/18/05, Michael Spang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eddy Petrisor wrote:
>
> >At least for wget. Firefox should not care about the location of the page.
> >
> >I don't want to shoot anybody and the site is great, but these kind of
> >problems can be
On 8/18/05, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eddy Petrisor wrote:
>
> >> ---
> >> >> Transitional//EN">
> >> ---
> >>
> >
> > Of course,
> >
> > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fs
On 8/17/05, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> > Lo all,
> >
> > http://sponsors.debian.net is now around 90% finished, so I'm looking
> > for people to try and break it :)
>
> This site seems to be empty, all i get is a white page with the following
> code (cod
> The important thing to realise is that Debian is in fact
> seriously flawed and needs to be fixed!
>
> I hope that (a) the need for a mutual exclusion guarantee
> is not in dispute and (b) that the existing unilateral
> declaration of such an exclusion by the 'Conflicts'
> declaration in a packa
9 matches
Mail list logo
