-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
Hi,
I'm packaging a simple library building a shared lib and a development
package as usual. The -dev package depends on the one containing the
shared library. Policy says that it is permitted in this situation to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Eddy Petrisor [Sat, 22 Jul 2006 15:07:17 +0300]:
If both packages come from the same source (as they should), you should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Upon completing a piuparts run I get
7m19.8s ERROR: Package purging left files on system:
/etc/xml
/usr/share/applications
owned by: gnome-terminal-data, gnome-menus, desktop-file-utils,
capplets-data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vedran Furač wrote:
Linda also
complains with message:
A binary links against a library it does not use symbols from
Which library, which binary? I'm not sure what to do about that.
That is a linda bug
- aspell-hr (The Croatian dictionary for
On 8/19/05, Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:39:15PM -0400, Tyler Trafford wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:31:54PM -0400, skaller wrote:
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 09:19 +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
This site is still not viewable with firefox.
I
On 8/18/05, Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eddy Petrisor wrote:
---
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//ENhtmlheadtitle/title/headbody/body/html
---
Of course,
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fsponsors.debian.net%2F
This site
On 8/18/05, Michael Spang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eddy Petrisor wrote:
At least for wget. Firefox should not care about the location of the page.
I don't want to shoot anybody and the site is great, but these kind of
problems can be avoided/fixed by means of using standards.
Please
On 8/17/05, Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil McGovern wrote:
Lo all,
http://sponsors.debian.net is now around 90% finished, so I'm looking
for people to try and break it :)
This site seems to be empty, all i get is a white page with the following
code (code-view)
---
The important thing to realise is that Debian is in fact
seriously flawed and needs to be fixed!
I hope that (a) the need for a mutual exclusion guarantee
is not in dispute and (b) that the existing unilateral
declaration of such an exclusion by the 'Conflicts'
declaration in a package is
9 matches
Mail list logo
