Ciao Gabriele,
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Gabriele Izzo wrote:
Gentili sponsor, vorrei diventare uno sviluppatore Debian e pertanto ho
intrapreso il percorso riportato nel sito debian.org. Pertanto come
indicato al passo 1 sono in cerca di uno sponsor. Per ulteriori
informazioni vi prego di
Ciao Gabriele,
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Gabriele Izzo wrote:
Gentili sponsor, vorrei diventare uno sviluppatore Debian e pertanto ho
intrapreso il percorso riportato nel sito debian.org. Pertanto come
indicato al passo 1 sono in cerca di uno sponsor. Per ulteriori
informazioni vi prego di
Hi John,
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, John Morrissey wrote:
I maintain mod_ldap_userdir and am interested in packaging it for Debian. It
allows UserDir URLs to be looked up based on homeDirectory attributes in an
LDAP directory instead of from local user accounts.
In the past year or two, several
Hi John,
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, John Morrissey wrote:
I maintain mod_ldap_userdir and am interested in packaging it for Debian. It
allows UserDir URLs to be looked up based on homeDirectory attributes in an
LDAP directory instead of from local user accounts.
In the past year or two, several
Hi,
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
You will need to build-deps on both apache-dev and apache2-*-dev (*
check the one you prefer). Use apxs for apache1.3 and apxs2 for apache2.
All the normal rules for building multiple binaries from the same source
applies.
Well let me make
Hi,
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
You will need to build-deps on both apache-dev and apache2-*-dev (*
check the one you prefer). Use apxs for apache1.3 and apxs2 for apache2.
All the normal rules for building multiple binaries from the same source
applies.
Well let me make
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Eric Winger wrote:
In putting my packages to my local repository, I've encountered a number
of messages questions.
When running dpkg-scanpackages I got this message:
! Package spinelli (filename pool/spinelli_0.9_i386.deb) is repeat;
ignored that one and using data
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Eric Winger wrote:
In putting my packages to my local repository, I've encountered a number
of messages questions.
When running dpkg-scanpackages I got this message:
! Package spinelli (filename pool/spinelli_0.9_i386.deb) is repeat;
ignored that one and using data
If noone already did, I will sponsor it since i use vtun on several
machine.
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Morgon Kanter wrote:
I'm the new maintainer of vtun, after it was orphaned. I have finished
packaging the new vtun (2.6), which includes a number of new goodies
and bug fixes. Available from:
Hi,
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Rene Engelhard wrote:
And that looks like it is f*cked. Is this Depends: done manually?
I do not thing dpkg-shlibdeps did that. Where is libc6?
Actually i was only worried about the licence because i know it can't be
there. We use it at work :-)
Fabio
--
Our
Hi,
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Emile van Bergen wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
I think upload must be moderated somehow. Even the uploader himself claim
that he is unsure about licence of the product.
Well, if the packages can only
Hi,
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Christoph Haas wrote:
Hi, Fabio...
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Really nice job but the first side effect is already there:
Package: icaclient
Thanks for the hint. That was a test package I was uploading to stress
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
We are very proud to announce the opening of the mentors project. We
have been working very hard[1] on this project since beginning of 2003.
Now the time has come to test and use it!
Really nice job but the first side effect is
Hi Deedra,
would you mind to tell us in which area you live? I don't exclude
the possibility of a DD just passing by or something like similar.
Thanks
Fabio
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Deedra Waters wrote:
I filled out the application to become a debian developer last night. I
have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all guys,
my actual sponsor is on vac and i would like get a new
version of the pkg in main to close a bug and to allign to the latest
policies. I will really appreciate if someone can take care of it.
Pkg is at:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
Hi,
here are some of my tips when packaging unofficial software as .debs.
Perhaps its useful for someone :)
[SNIP]
If there is already an official package eg with version 1.1-4, then
use
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
BTW never forget that external archive can be as dangerous as usefull.
Warn ALWAYS the user that is not an official repository and don't use it
only for your own glory.. help
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fre, 2003-02-28 at 18:08, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
I would also add something about dependencies. Be sure to build always
againt the main debian archive and in the worst case with pkgs that are in
your external archive of which you have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
Hi,
here are some of my tips when packaging unofficial software as .debs.
Perhaps its useful for someone :)
[SNIP]
If there is already an official package eg with version 1.1-4, then
use
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
BTW never forget that external archive can be as dangerous as usefull.
Warn ALWAYS the user that is not an official repository and don't use it
only for your own glory.. help
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fre, 2003-02-28 at 18:08, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
I would also add something about dependencies. Be sure to build always
againt the main debian archive and in the worst case with pkgs that are in
your external archive of which you have
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
I also had the problem, but then after a time the package built
correctly. You could simply look at it today to see if it is already
solved.
Unfortunatly mine is at the second
Hi Oliver,
I got same the problem with my pkg. the autobuilder have tried
again after a few days failing with even a worst error. I have tried
searching on the web for a contact point without success.
Fabio
Checking available source versions...
/usr/bin/apt-cache failed
Giving back
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
I also had the problem, but then after a time the package built
correctly. You could simply look at it today to see if it is already
solved.
Unfortunatly mine is at the second
24 matches
Mail list logo
