Re: packaging sqliteman

2007-09-11 Thread François Févotte
Hi David, > I picked sqliteman purely because I needed/wanted a GUI frontend (there > isn't a similar program already in Debian AFAICT) and this was one of > only a handful I was able to find on Google... > > I would still like to see such an application in Debian, as well as > finding a usable pr

Re: ITS: sqlitebrowser; was: Re: RFC: sqlitebrowser - GUI editor for SQLite databases

2007-08-08 Thread François Févotte
Hi Laszlo, Thank you for your quick reply. On 8/5/07, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I dislike QT based things, but as I'm the maintainer of sqlite > and sqlite3, I will review your package and may sponsor it. I usually dislike QT too, but sqlitebrowser is the only softwa

RFC: sqlitebrowser - GUI editor for SQLite databases

2007-08-05 Thread François Févotte
. Kind regards François Févotte [1] http://bugs.debian.org/427080

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread François Févotte
Hello, On 7/20/07, Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: lintian spits out warnings about -x flag on the py-files, as they all has a shebang, also the setup.py generates a cgpdfpng that only will work under OSX, but I don't know a good way to fix that. to remove unneeded shebang lines, I

Re: Licensing problems for mpeg2vidcodec

2007-07-04 Thread François Févotte
On 7/3/07, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Without consent from the copyright holders, I would say that you've got it in one. Without a licence, it is not free software, it is not even distributable so it cannot go into non-free either. Overall, it is about as off-limits as OutlookExpres

Licensing problems for mpeg2vidcodec

2007-07-03 Thread François Févotte
Dear Mentors, I would like to package mpeg2vidcodec, which the reference implementation of the MPEG2 codec provided by the MPEG Software Simulation Group[1]. It provides two binaries (mpeg2encode and mpeg2decode), which are needed by ImageMagick to handle MPEG files. However, the authors of this

Re: Adoption of a package that doesn't need work (yet)

2007-05-25 Thread François Févotte
Hello, On 5/24/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There's no reason to upload unless there's a change to the package needed OK, that's what I thought. That said, you should be subscribed to the PTS for the package, and should make an upload as soon as there is something to fix, eve

Adoption of a package that doesn't need work (yet)

2007-05-24 Thread François Févotte
Hello mentors, I recently filed ITAs for eukleides[1] and xeukleides[2]. However, since there had been a QA upload[3] not long before, I don't have any "real" work to do on the package yet. I'm not sure how I should actually adopt these packages. Should I make a new package only modifying the ma

Adopting eukleides and xeukleides

2007-05-15 Thread François Févotte
Hello, I recently filed ITAs for eukleides[1] and xeukleides[2]. However, since there had been a QA upload[3] not long before, I don't have any "real" work to do on the package yet. I'm not sure how I should actually adopt these packages. Should I make a new package only modifying the maintainer

Re: RFS template request

2007-04-27 Thread François Févotte
Hello, On 4/27/07, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christoph Haas ha scritto: > If anyone has some Python code ready to do that I'll happily include > that. Otherwise I'll put your proposal on our todo list. I did something in PHP. It correctly parses the package name (from debian/cont

Re: how remove leading / at dh_install ?

2006-12-11 Thread François Févotte
Hi, On 12/11/06, andremachado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So, it have to be an absolute path... The dh_install man-page [1] seems to indicate that the paths given to dh_install have to be relative: The name of the files (or directories) to install should be given relative to the current dire

Re: RFS: exaile

2006-12-04 Thread François Févotte
Hi Rogério, On 12/4/06, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately, it still seems to be there. :-( I would love to get it in Debian proper [*]. We actually had problems with the first upload, which got refused by the ftp masters due to an architecture-dependant file under /usr/sha

RFC: exaile -- flexible audio player (similar to Amarok, but in GTK+)

2006-11-24 Thread François Févotte
Dear mentors, Could you please review and comment my exaile package (especially as the debian python policy is concerned)? The package builds fine in a pbuilder environment and is lintian clean. You can find it on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exaile - S

Re: RFS: exaile

2006-10-22 Thread François Févotte
/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exaile/exaile_0.2.4-1.dsc Thank you for looking at it. François Févotte

Re: RFS: exaile

2006-10-17 Thread François Févotte
/main/e/exaile/exaile_0.2.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone could help me improving the package quality or upload it on my behalf. Thanks in advance, François On 10/17/06, François Févotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "exaile&quo

Re: RFS: exaile

2006-10-17 Thread François Févotte
Hello, On 10/17/06, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/17/06, François Févotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > exaile - an AmaroK-like media player It's a minor issue, but Amarok upstream just uses a capital A and lowercase k as of somewhere in the 1.4.x

RFS: exaile

2006-10-16 Thread François Févotte
an unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exaile/exaile_0.2.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Thanks in advance and kind regards, François Févotte

RFS: ipager

2006-10-16 Thread François Févotte
et http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ipager/ipager_1.1.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards François Févotte