Fwknop: Layout suggestions for a future implementation

- one for 4+5 - one for 6 To me it looks reasonable to split it. What do others think? Upstream is also insterested in hearing your opinions :) Regards, -- Franck Joncourt http://debian.org - http://smhteam.info/wiki/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: swatch (updated package)

ot needing > the comma :) I have not followed the whole thread, but you may be interested in taking a look at it: http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2008/09/msg00014.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma :) Regards, -- Franck Joncourt http://debian.org - http://smhteam.info/wiki/ Fingerprint : C10E D1D0 EF70 0A2A CACF 9A3C C490 534E 75C0 89FE signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Fwknop and the install process

Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 07:43:38PM +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote: [...] >> So, right now, I would choose to work this way : >> >> - not ask for any questions and not start fwknopd during the install >> process ; a variable would be set t

Fwknop and the install process

, by use of dpkg-reconfigure. Add a note about the recommended settings. But what about starting the simple setup through the three questions, by default, and mentionning that the user might want to configure gpg and restart. What would you suggest ? Any idea is welcome. Thanks, -- Franck