instead of ed (you'll need to
depend on sed =3.95).
Or simply remove the -e option. builtin echo parses \n in bash as well as
dash.
Ganesan
--
Ganesan R (rganesan at debian dot org) | http://www.debian.org/~rganesan/
1024D/5D8C12EA, fingerprint F361 84F1 8D82 32E7 1832 6798 15E0 02BA 5D8C 12EA
to build binary-all and binary-arch packages from a single
source. Any recommendations?
Ganesan
--
Ganesan R (rganesan at debian dot org) | http://www.debian.org/~rganesan/
1024D/5D8C12EA, fingerprint F361 84F1 8D82 32E7 1832 6798 15E0 02BA 5D8C 12EA
. By the way,
isn't the question about Build-Depends (not Depends)?
Ganesan
--
Ganesan R
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
his Depends line is fine. By the way,
isn't the question about Build-Depends (not Depends)?
Ganesan
--
Ganesan R
Adam == Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote:
1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is
sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than
asking upstream to change the source tarball?
You can rename the source
Henrique == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote:
What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed.
I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous.
HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to package it simply
Ganesan == Ganesan R [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can understand the concern. Okay, for now ssed will simply be another
extra package. Since alternatives is out, the info files are still a problem
though. Unlike /usr/sbin/sed the info files are split into multiple files
with cross-linked
Adam == Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote:
1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is
sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than
asking upstream to change the source tarball?
You can rename the source
Henrique == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote:
What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed.
I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous.
HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to package it simply
Ganesan == Ganesan R [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can understand the concern. Okay, for now ssed will simply be another
extra package. Since alternatives is out, the info files are still a problem
though. Unlike /usr/sbin/sed the info files are split into multiple files
with cross-linked
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to mailing-list.debian-devel as well.
rganesan == rganesan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
ssed is a version of sed that supports a few new features, including Perl
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to mailing-list.debian-devel as well.
rganesan == rganesan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
ssed is a version of sed that supports a few new features, including Perl
if there is such
problem. HTH.
Ganesan
--
Ganesan R ([EMAIL PROTECTED])| http://people.debian.org/~rganesan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
priority uploads, 5 days for medium and 2 days for high. Of course, if the
package is dependent on another package which is held up, it can take much
longer.
Ganesan
--
Ganesan R ([EMAIL PROTECTED])| http://people.debian.org/~rganesan
if there is such
problem. HTH.
Ganesan
--
Ganesan R ([EMAIL PROTECTED])| http://people.debian.org/~rganesan
15 matches
Mail list logo
