Re: gcc best practices | problems

r in > exceptional cases, such as a kernel or libc needing a particular compiler > version because the package abuses the compiler). What about packages not actively maintained upstream? In my case (jlint), the fix was relatively easy but it in some cases the fix may not be obvious to the ma

Re: [RFS] me-jasspa -- small but powerful emacs-like editor

>>>>> Patrick Das Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can somebody have a look at it and possibly report any problems? And if > found good hopefully upload it? Where do we find it? Ganesan -- Ganesan Rajagopal (rganesan at debian.org) | GPG Key: 1024D/5D8C12E

Re: Inter-library dependencies

> "Andreas" == Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PS: The libtool manual promises this issue to be solved in the future, > but when? It has been already solved; unfortunately the official release (1.3.4 or is it 1.3.5) doesn't support it. Get libtool-1.3b from alpha.gnu.org and us

How do I send a ITP wnpp for multiple packages

Hi, I have recently joined the new maintainer program. I intend to package OpenSLP (http://www.openslp.org), a free implementation of the IETF Service Location Protocol (BSD style license). wnpp says I should send a wishlist bug with subject ITP: {package-name} -- {short description}. OpenSLP a

Re: ITP: OpenSLP - Service Location Protocol (SLP) v2 implementation

version, I am putting up the CVS snapshot now so that I can get some feedback. I've built the packages on Potato and they are lintian clean. Is it absolutely necessary that I have to build them against woody before I can actually upload these? Ganesan >>>>> "Ganesan"

Re: ITP: OpenSLP - Service Location Protocol (SLP) v2 implementation

>>>>> "Ganesan" == Ganesan Rajagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I am currently in the NM queue. I am looking for a sponsor to upload > packages for OpenSLP. My experimental packages are available at > ftp://openslp.sourceforge.net:/pub/o

Re: zoo: directory traversal security bug

Not to me. I don't think it's a requirement to know C to maintain a package. Ganesan -- Ganesan Rajagopal (rganesan at debian.org) | GPG Key: 1024D/5D8C12EA Web: http://employees.org/~rganesan| http://rganesan.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Long time in account creation?

Hi, My application manager approved my application ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2001-03-21 but the account is yet to be created. Everytime I check the page, I see no updates to the following status. -- DAM Phone Contact Not Required DAM Approval -- Account Created No Application Manager Comments -- M

Re: Inter-library dependencies

> "Andreas" == Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PS: The libtool manual promises this issue to be solved in the future, > but when? It has been already solved; unfortunately the official release (1.3.4 or is it 1.3.5) doesn't support it. Get libtool-1.3b from alpha.gnu.org and u

How do I send a ITP wnpp for multiple packages

Hi, I have recently joined the new maintainer program. I intend to package OpenSLP (http://www.openslp.org), a free implementation of the IETF Service Location Protocol (BSD style license). wnpp says I should send a wishlist bug with subject ITP: {package-name} -- {short description}. OpenSLP

Re: ITP: OpenSLP - Service Location Protocol (SLP) v2 implementation

version, I am putting up the CVS snapshot now so that I can get some feedback. I've built the packages on Potato and they are lintian clean. Is it absolutely necessary that I have to build them against woody before I can actually upload these? Ganesan >>>>> "Ganesan"

Re: ITP: OpenSLP - Service Location Protocol (SLP) v2 implementation

>>>>> "Ganesan" == Ganesan Rajagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I am currently in the NM queue. I am looking for a sponsor to upload > packages for OpenSLP. My experimental packages are available at > ftp://openslp.sourceforge.net:/pub/o

Long time in account creation?

Hi, My application manager approved my application ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2001-03-21 but the account is yet to be created. Everytime I check the page, I see no updates to the following status. -- DAM Phone Contact Not Required DAM Approval -- Account Created No Application Manager Comments --