Hello again,
A new version has been uploaded to mentors. It contains the following
changes since last time:
- Upstream's CGAL patches were removed from the DFSG sources to
simplify copyright information. These are not needed for CGAL >>
4.11, and so the build-deps were updated accordingly.
On Tuesday 13 March 2018 13:58:07 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 06:48:10PM +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 March 2018 00:18:32 CET Gard Spreemann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > > Please
On Sunday 11 March 2018 00:18:32 CET Gard Spreemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Please review d/copyright. I found at least one undocumented file which
> > is licensed Apache 2.0 and another one under LGPL3+. Neither are in
> >
On Wednesday 7 March 2018 20:10:29 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> Argh, was not done yet when I hit send...
>
> - d/rules:
> - the override for dh_autoclean could be replaced by the file d/clean
Fixed.
> - as you arch all packages: please build those in build-indep.
> Especially doxygen has a hu
On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> But the lintian stuff I complained about is not completly fixed, there
> is even a new tag:
> I: gudhi source: quilt-patch-missing-description no-external-doc-
> resources.patch
>
> Please run lintian after every build! Best, include it
h-generic
> […]
Upstream provided a patch that fixes this. I've updated
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gudhi/gudhi_2.1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
Best regards,
Gard Spreemann
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 22:26:58 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> Ok, it builds now.
> But there are tons of lintian warnings "privacy-break-generic", just
> one example: Not checked, but maybe some template for the doc
> generation has a link to this site?
>
> […]
>
> There are other lintian war
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Tuesday 26 December 2017 21:58:36 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> I was checking your RFS, but I cannot get it compiled...
> Please check and then remove the moreinfo tag again...
Hello again,
Upstream has now released GUDHI 2.1.0 which is compatible with the
CGAL versio
On Tuesday 26 December 2017 21:58:36 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Gard,
>
> I was checking your RFS, but I cannot get it compiled...
Hello Tobias, and thanks for your feedback.
Apparently this is a known regression [1] when building with CGAL
4.11. That version entered sid after last time I buil
On Monday 16 October 2017 11:53:08 CEST Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 16/10/17 11:22, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> > Not relevant since the upload would be to sid anyway, right?
>
> FYI, current version is 4.1.1.
Checked and bumped. Thanks.
> > E: python3-gudhi: binary-o
use libjs-jquery
>From #736360 and #736432 I had the impression that this is a
long-standing problem where there is not yet any consensus about how
to proceed. Am I overlooking something?
Again, thanks a lot for your feedback.
Best regards,
Gard Spreemann
The package has now been updated to the latest upstream (2.0.1).
It can be downloaded by
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gudhi/gudhi_2.0.1+dfsg-1.dsc
Regards,
Gard Spreemann
On Monday 24 July 2017 23:10:33 CEST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
>
> Please bump Standards-Version to the current version and I'll upload
> it.
Hello Andrey,
As Andrew pointed out, he has already uploaded the package. I will
make sure to bump the standards-version for the nex
Upstream has since released a new version of GUDHI (2.0.0). The RFS
bug #861649 [1], which has been merged with this one, details my
package for it. I believe it addresses most of the problems helpfully
pointed out here.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861649
Best,
Gard
this by looking only for
version 3 of both.
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/gudhi
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/m
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 20:47:07 CET Gard Spreemann wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:46:46 CET Roger Shimizu wrote:
> >
> > - have separated -doc package
>
> The documentation shipped with upstream's source is rather
> limited. They instead
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:46:46 CET Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Dear Gard,
>
> I cannot sponsor the upload. But here's my review that I hope it's helpful.
Dear Roger,
Thank you very much for your helpful feedback. I believe I have
rectified some of the below.
> Here're the items need to be fi
ackage lacks a watch file. I need advice as to
how this is best done when upstream releases both as tarball and as
tagged git commits, with slight differences.
Regards,
Gard Spreemann
ds cleanly against a sid pbuilder.
Best,
Gard Spreemann
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 18:31:48 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi
>
> >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbfgsb/lbfgsb_3.0-2.dsc
> >addresses the standards-version and the dbg package. I'll have to work
> >on the watch file and (if needed) the build system.
>
> ok, let me know when
On Friday 25 March 2016 18:56:40 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> something needs changes:
> - std-version= 3.9.7
> - no watch file?
> - no sane build system, why are you building the library such way?
> you seem to use just two files in your library, why everything is dropped?
> I don't think flags
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 14:27:45 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> HI,
>
> >I didn't make one since upstream's tarball (at least for the latest
> >version) contains precompiled binaries, as well as a few files outside
> >of any directory (a little tarbomb). It is my understanding that these
> >nee
On Friday 25 March 2016 18:56:40 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
Hi, and thanks for the feedback!
> something needs changes:
> - std-version= 3.9.7
Yep, I'll update that.
> - no watch file?
I didn't make one since upstream's tarball (at least for the latest
version) contains precompiled bin
are/Lbfgsb.3.0.tar.gz
[2] http://users.iems.northwestern.edu/~nocedal/lbfgsb.html
Regards,
Gard Spreemann
24 matches
Mail list logo
