Bug#741644: RFS: keyringer/0.3.2-1 -- Distributed secret management using GnuPG and Git

2014-06-06 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
intrigeri writes: > Control: retitle -1 RFS: keyringer/0.3.6-1 -- Distributed secret management > using GnuPG and Git > > Hi, > > (sorry for the delay..) > > Gaudenz Steinlin wrote (20 May 2014 16:26:21 GMT) : >> I guess this is a sponsorship request. > > I

Bug#741644: RFS: keyringer/0.3.2-1 -- Distributed secret management using GnuPG and Git

2014-05-20 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi Silvio Rhatto writes: > Em Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:04:22PM -0300, Silvio Rhatto escreveu: >> Sorry for the delay. I just released keyringer 0.3.4 and I think it's >> ready to be uploaded on debian unstable. > > Sorry for bug you again. I just release 0.3.6 including a minor but > important f

Bug#741644: RFS: keyringer/0.3.2-1 -- Distributed secret management using GnuPG and Git

2014-04-16 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
intrigeri writes: > Hi, > > Silvio Rhatto wrote (22 Mar 2014 19:53:54 GMT) : >> I just released 0.3.3 with fixed suggested in this thread. > > Looks good to me, feel free to retitle and reuse this RFS. > > Note that your branches don't seem to have been pushed to Git yet, > while the tags have be

Re: RFS; chora - online repository viewer

2005-05-14 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:37:38PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > Additionally, there is an RFP out for this component that can be > found at http://bugs.debian.org/242889 (since April 2004; I have > CC'd the bug). If you intend this package to end up in the Debian archive you should retitl

Re: reassigning bugs

2005-03-30 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 02:07:02PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 01:46:02PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:41:32PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > reassign libgtk2.0-0, sawfish > > > thanks &g

Re: reassigning bugs

2005-03-30 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:41:32PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > reassign libgtk2.0-0, sawfish > thanks What's this actually supposed to do? I can't find any information about this syntax in the BTS documentation. Do you mean something like (or is this an undocumented feature): clone

Re: RFS: stress

2005-02-27 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:42:40PM -0600, Amos Waterland wrote: > On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:28:50 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > But #269512 is your ITP. Please ONLY ever close bug reports relevant to > > the changelog entry like this. > > > > Also for an initial upl

Re: RFS: stress

2005-02-26 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:17:42PM -0600, Amos Waterland wrote: > Source: stress > Section: devel > Priority: optional > Maintainer: Amos Waterland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.2.0) > Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 > > Package: stress > Architecture: any > Depends: ${shlibs:Dep

Re: RFS: x-no-session-manager - restore default X behavior with gnome/kde installed

2005-02-04 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:45:58PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > BTW I don't see why anyone would not want a x-session-manager. I just > > remove all the things I don't want from my gnome-session w

Re: RFS: x-no-session-manager - restore default X behavior with gnome/kde installed

2005-02-04 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:40:45PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thursday 03 February 2005 13.54, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > >> Having to tweak the alternative manually to something non executable but > >> existing requires insig

Re: RFS: Bustle - to do list manager with a difference

2005-01-29 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 08:41:52PM +0200, Fred Strauss wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:38:53 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi Fred > > > > My dependencies were pretty much based on the script example from the > maintainer

Re: RFS: Bustle - to do list manager with a difference

2005-01-29 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi Fred Some more questions and suggestions concerning your package: - As you are also the upstram author of Bustle, why do you fix your makefile in the Debian diff and don't incorporate these changes in a new upstream release? - Why do you build depend on libncurses5, libxcursor1, libxft2 a

Re: porting applications

2005-01-19 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:54:05PM -0600, micah milano wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:47:48 +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Or should I be changing my architecture to be only those specific ones > > > that it is known to compile for (I guess no, because the Devel

Re: upgrade with incompatible conffiles

2004-02-11 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Am Die, den 10.02.2004 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 02:26: > Hi > > I'm preparing packages for the new upstream version (2.0.2) of the > Discover hardware detection system (referenced as discover2). The last > version of discover in Debian is 1.5 (referenced as discover1

Re: upgrade with incompatible conffiles

2004-02-11 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Am Die, den 10.02.2004 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 02:26: > Hi > > I'm preparing packages for the new upstream version (2.0.2) of the > Discover hardware detection system (referenced as discover2). The last > version of discover in Debian is 1.5 (referenced as discover1

Re: Sponsorship guidelines

2004-02-10 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Am Die, den 10.02.2004 schrieb Matthew Palmer um 12:07: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > > I make no guarantees about how quickly your upload will be made. This > > > has been a big problem in the past, and I hope it will never be so ba

Re: Sponsorship guidelines

2004-02-10 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Am Die, den 10.02.2004 schrieb Matthew Palmer um 12:07: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > > I make no guarantees about how quickly your upload will be made. This > > > has been a big problem in the past, and I hope it will never be so ba

Re: Sponsorship guidelines

2004-02-10 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Am Die, den 10.02.2004 schrieb Matthew Palmer um 10:01: > Discussion can be either on-list or privately, whatever you fancy. I'd also > appreciate comments from potential sponsees as to whether the notes are > comprehensible, and whether I've gone power-mad. I would prefer on-list discussion (off

Re: Sponsorship guidelines

2004-02-10 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Am Die, den 10.02.2004 schrieb Matthew Palmer um 10:01: > Discussion can be either on-list or privately, whatever you fancy. I'd also > appreciate comments from potential sponsees as to whether the notes are > comprehensible, and whether I've gone power-mad. I would prefer on-list discussion (off

upgrade with incompatible conffiles

2004-02-09 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi I'm preparing packages for the new upstream version (2.0.2) of the Discover hardware detection system (referenced as discover2). The last version of discover in Debian is 1.5 (referenced as discover1). The name of the package is discover. The current discover package contains a conffile /etc/d

upgrade with incompatible conffiles

2004-02-09 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi I'm preparing packages for the new upstream version (2.0.2) of the Discover hardware detection system (referenced as discover2). The last version of discover in Debian is 1.5 (referenced as discover1). The name of the package is discover. The current discover package contains a conffile /etc/d

RFS: passepartout - fixes 1 RC bug

2004-01-19 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
My sponsor for passepartout is on vacation. Therefore I'm looking for a "one time" sponsor for my package passepartout. The package was initially sponsored by Matthias Ulrichs and later by Sebastian Ley. The new package includes the following changes: * New upstream release (closes: #225925, #2

RFS: passepartout - fixes 1 RC bug

2004-01-19 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
My sponsor for passepartout is on vacation. Therefore I'm looking for a "one time" sponsor for my package passepartout. The package was initially sponsored by Matthias Ulrichs and later by Sebastian Ley. The new package includes the following changes: * New upstream release (closes: #225925, #2

RFS: passepartout - GNOME Desktop Publishing Application

2003-10-27 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi I'm looking for a sponsor for passepartout. You can download the source package at http://www.soziologie.ch/~steinlin/passepartout/ This package had an RFP (now ITP) "bug" (#214216). Description: GNOME Desktop Publishing Application Passepartout is an Open Source Desktop Publishing applic

RFS: passepartout - GNOME Desktop Publishing Application

2003-10-27 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi I'm looking for a sponsor for passepartout. You can download the source package at http://www.soziologie.ch/~steinlin/passepartout/ This package had an RFP (now ITP) "bug" (#214216). Description: GNOME Desktop Publishing Application Passepartout is an Open Source Desktop Publishing applic