Re: nbc package has been removed from Mentors

2012-07-16 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 16 July 2012 11:58:23 Slavko wrote: > Hi Thibaut, Hi, > thank you for quick reply. > > Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:30:35 +0200 Thibaut Paumard > > napísal: > > It's not easy to get a sponsor, especially during a freeze (please > > read my previous message from 15min ago entitled "Re: fre

Re: packaging help

2012-04-24 Thread George Danchev
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:39:41 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: On 04/24/2012 03:16 PM, Whit Armstrong wrote: I would be looking for 6-64999, assuming my package eventually made it into debian, I suppose it would need to have a 'globally allocated' uid. The idea is simply not to give users exe

Bug#664634: RFS: engauge-digitizer/5.0-2 [RC]

2012-03-20 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 19 March 2012 15:52:38 Tobias Winchen wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi Tobias, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer" > * Added patch fixing passing double as qreal. Closes: #656943 (FTBFS on > armel and armhf) While the original reporter of bug #656943 did his bes

Re: Best use of bug tracker for a complicated situation

2012-03-19 Thread George Danchev
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:37:45 +, Tony Houghton wrote: Hi, I maintain roxterm. The source package of that name generates a number of binary packages: roxterm-common, roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 and roxterm (a virtual package depending on roxterm-gtk3). A user has reported 2 bugs with sligh

Bug#662968: RFS: shc/3.8.7-1

2012-03-07 Thread George Danchev
Hi Vibhav, Please have a look at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=327263 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508109 -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm

Re: RFS: quickrdp

2012-01-24 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 22 January 2012 17:08:48 Tobias Eliasson wrote: Hi, --cut-- > > There are multiple implementations of telnet in Debian. Does quickrdp > > really need this particular one provided by the "telnet" binary > > package? If not, then the recommendation/suggestion should be changed > > to "tel

Re: RFS: engauge-digitizer

2012-01-22 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 07 January 2012 18:48:29 Tobias Winchen wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi, (a bit late, but anyway ...) > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer". > The package is an update for engauge-digitizer 4.1, which is already in > debian. The update closes the following bugs: #6

Re: RFS: OpenCPN navigation (ITP #538067)

2012-01-19 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 16 January 2012 09:09:27 Hamish wrote: > Hi, Hi, (just to summarize the log from IRC session, we had) > It's been 5 weeks without response, and no luck finding a sponsor on > IRC, so I'll try a repeat posting. :-) Yeah, a lot of effort has been put into making this packaged properly (

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 22 December 2011 23:49:36 Tobias Frost wrote: > Hallo George, Hoi, (top posting is not preferred:) > dbixxx is currently not used and could be removed for the moment -- I > only have a feature branch that needs this library, but this feature is > quite low priority for the moment. (P

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 22 December 2011 13:37:36 Tobias Frost wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "solarpowerlog". > > * Package name: solarpowerlog >Version : 0.21-1 >Upstream Author : Tobias Frost > * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.50

2011-08-15 Thread George Danchev
On Monday, August 15, 2011 12:41:29 AM Reijo Tomperi wrote: > Hi, > > New upstream version was released, so I made a new Debian package of it. > > I'm again looking for a sponsor for it. > > It is lintian clean and builds with cowbuilder. > > To access further information about this package, pl

Re: Nitpicking: you are doing it wrong

2011-07-08 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 12:41:09 AM Leo "costela" Antunes wrote: > On 08/07/11 22:23, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 07/08/2011 08:47 PM, Scott Howard wrote: > >> Right now, the general consensus is the dh and cdbs produce > >> debian packages that are easier to maintain in the long run (if the >

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2011-06-26 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday, June 23, 2011 07:33:58 PM Tony Houghton wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.22.2-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clea

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.49

2011-06-14 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 10:41:06 PM George Danchev wrote: > On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 09:57:33 PM Reijo Tomperi wrote: Hi, > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.49-1.dsc > > Fix segmentation fault with asm code. Closes: #625959 > we are now

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.49

2011-06-14 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 09:57:33 PM Reijo Tomperi wrote: > Hi, > > New upstream version was released, so I made a new Debian package of it. > > I'm again looking for a sponsor for it. > > It is lintian clean and builds with cowbuilder. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - U

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2011-06-02 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 02 June 2011 16:38:00 Tony Houghton wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.22.1-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. >

Re: RFS: stx-btree (updated package)

2011-05-24 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 24 May 2011 11:17:56 Ury Stankevich wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Ury Stankevich wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, George Danchev wrote: > >> You don't need to build-depend on 'quilt' with '3.0 (quilt)' source > &

Re: RFS: stx-btree (updated package)

2011-05-23 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 23 May 2011 09:23:27 Ury Stankevich wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, George Danchev wrote: > > Package looks good, though I'd like to: > > 1) drop quilt from Build-Depends. > > Hi, > i'm not really sure if i should drop quilt from Build-Dep

Re: RFS or Review: nzbget

2011-05-22 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 22 May 2011 20:28:01 Andreas Moog wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi, Vote (signed): +1. looks a good one, in a sense I'm unable to find a flaw :-) I hope you find a sponsor who'll be actually using it. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message par

Re: RFS: stx-btree (updated package)

2011-05-20 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 19 May 2011 16:54:15 Ury Stankevich wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:42 PM, George Danchev wrote: > > As a start your debian/changelog does not mention that a patch was > > dropped since it has been applied upstream. It is not a big deal in that > > particula

Re: RFS: stx-btree (updated package)

2011-05-18 Thread George Danchev
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 16:11:36 Ury Stankevich wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi, > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stx-btree/stx-btree_0.8.6-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. I will have a closer look in the next few days unless anyone else sponsor it i

Re: bt747: doubts on licenses and embedded libraries

2011-05-15 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 15 May 2011 21:01:44 Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: Hi, > > > To be honest, I had the same problem as you with Freeplane and JOrtho, > > > and I decided to keep JOrtho as part of the freeplane package, under > > > the binary name libjortho-freeplane-java. > > > The reasons were: > > > - J

Re: bt747: doubts on licenses and embedded libraries

2011-05-15 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:48:07 Eric Lavarde wrote: > Hello Monica, Hi, > interesting that you're now working on bt747: I'm also using this > program to download my GPS tracks and flag my photos, wanted as well to > package it, and basically silently gave up as I looked into it :-P I'd actually f

Re: RFS: rsplib-2.7.11 (implementation of the IETF RSerPool framework and example applications)

2011-05-06 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 06 May 2011 13:32:41 Mahyuddin Susanto wrote: > On 05/06/2011 04:55 PM, Thomas Dreibholz wrote: > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rsplib > > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > >

Re: RFS: frei0r (updated package)

2011-04-29 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 29 April 2011 11:46:26 Jaromil wrote: > dear George, Hi, > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, George Danchev wrote: > > > The upload would fix these bugs: 459940 > > > > Just to let you know, this is a wrong bug number to close. > > ack. i understand it is an ubunt

Re: RFS: stx-btree (updated package)

2011-04-28 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 28 April 2011 13:55:29 Ury Stankevich wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi, > The upload would fix these bugs: 624351 > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stx-btree/stx-btree_0.8.3-4.dsc > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Good [1]. Uploaded. Thanks! (JFTR: you

Re: RFS: frei0r (updated package)

2011-04-27 Thread George Danchev
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 12:20:12 Jaromil wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3-1 > of my package "frei0r". > > It builds these binary packages: > frei0r-plugins - minimalistic plugin API for video effects, plugins > collection frei0r-plugins-dev - min

Re: [Fwd] Bug#621966: hasciicam: FTBFS: hasciicam.c

2011-04-27 Thread George Danchev
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 10:37:23 Jaromil wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, George Danchev wrote: > > >to make it really clear let me specify that i'm not bashing Lucas > > >for filing a bug here, nor the maintainers of hasciicam for giving > > >it a very low prio

Re: [Fwd] Bug#621966: hasciicam: FTBFS: hasciicam.c

2011-04-26 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 17:14:24 Jaromil wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, George Danchev wrote: > I had a look at it since it is a relatively simple package one can > quickly learn to grasp and you fix a FTBFS, though the diff compared > to what we have in sid is rather large. you

Re: [Fwd] Bug#621966: hasciicam: FTBFS: hasciicam.c

2011-04-26 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 11:53:58 Jaromil wrote: dear George, Dear Jaromil, Let's skip mediterranean style dramas. I had a look at it since it is a relatively simple package one can quickly learn to grasp and you fix a FTBFS, though the diff compared to what we have in sid is rather large. I

Re: [Fwd] Bug#621966: hasciicam: FTBFS: hasciicam.c

2011-04-26 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 10:35:51 Jaromil wrote: dear Mentors, Dear Jaromil, first and foremost: thanks for your answers! On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, The Fungi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:28:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I see that one uploader of hasciicam is Debian Developer. He i

Re: RFS: alure (updated package)

2011-04-23 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:03:32 Tobias Hansen wrote: > Am 23.04.2011 05:07, schrieb Paul Wise: > > I would suggest adding a symbols file so that stuff using the new > > symbols gets the new version and anything else gets the old version. > > > > http://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles > > On

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.48

2011-04-21 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 20:36:46 Reijo Tomperi wrote: Hi, >>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.48-1.dsc > > > > You don't need libtinyxml2.5.3, libpcre3 explicitly listed in Depends in > > that > > Thanks, I was a bit unsure about how the depends work. I removed

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.48

2011-04-20 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 20:36:46 Reijo Tomperi wrote: Hi, http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.48-1.dsc > > You don't need libtinyxml2.5.3, libpcre3 explicitly listed in Depends in > that Thanks, I was a bit unsure about how the depends work. I removed those

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.48

2011-04-18 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 00:24:36 Reijo Tomperi wrote: > Hi, Hi, > New upstream version was released, so I made a new Debian package of it. > > I'm again looking for a sponsor for it. > > It is lintian clean and builds with cowbuilder. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - UR

Re: RFS: sic (updated package/adoption)

2011-04-03 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 31 March 2011 13:39:16 Jeroen Schot wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi, > sic- simple irc client (sic) > The upload would fix this bug: 606083 (ITA) > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sic/sic_1.1-4.dsc Looks good. Uploaded. Thanks for taking care of orphaned packages. --

Re: RFS: scidavis (updated package) - FTBFS

2011-03-20 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 17 March 2011 17:21:08 Ruben Molina wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.4-3 > of my package "scidavis". > > It builds these binary packages: > scidavis - application for scientific data analysis and visualization > > The package appears to

Re: Fw: failed hppa build of roxterm 1.21.4-1

2011-03-18 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 18 March 2011 15:54:13 Tony Houghton wrote: > I received a message (below) about one of the package builders failing > on roxterm. The error is: > >dh_shlibdeps -a > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 187: elf_get_dynamic_info: > Assertion `info[20]->d_un.d_val == 7' fa

Re: RFS: bashburn

2011-03-14 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 14 March 2011 00:28:57 Andreas Noteng wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bashburn". > > * Package name: bashburn > Version : 3.0.1-1 > Upstream Author : Anders Lindén > * URL : http://bashburn.dose.se/ > * License

Re: RFS: cppcheck, 1.47-4

2011-03-07 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 07 March 2011 22:11:23 Reijo Tomperi wrote: > Hi, Hi, > Cppcheck 1.47-3 is already accepted, but it fails to build on some > platforms. This version (1.47-4) contains a patch from upstream which > tries to fix that bug. > > * 3rd try fixing FTBFS in multiple architectures. Closes: #613

Re: RFS: stx-btree (updated package)

2011-02-27 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 25 February 2011 09:32:30 Ury Stankevich wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-3 > of my package "stx-btree". > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stx-btree/stx-btree_0.8.3-3.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package

Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response

2010-10-30 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Michael Tautschnig" : Hi Michael, I liked the idea of requesting reviews from people whose packages will get sponsored; but I'd just ask for doing that voluntarily. I probably should have taken the chance to ask people for doing so yesterday, maybe I'll even send those people anothe

Re: RFS: bgoffice (QA upload, RC bugfix)

2010-07-25 Thread George Danchev
Yavor Doganov writes: > Dear mentors, -- > The upload would fix these bugs: 589851 > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bgoffice/bgoffice_3.0-11.dsc Uploaded. Thank you for the fix. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-07-24 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.5-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bug

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package, fix a bug)

2010-07-02 Thread George Danchev
William Vera writes: > Hello > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, George Danchev wrote: > > William Vera writes: > >> Dear mentors, > > > > Hi, > > > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-12 > >> of my package &qu

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package, fix a bug)

2010-07-02 Thread George Danchev
William Vera writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-12 > of my package "scrot". > > It builds these binary packages: > scrot - command line screen capture utility > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 5

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-06-25 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:23:46 +0300 Hi, > George Danchev wrote: > > Tony Houghton writes: > > > However, due to a bug which can cause roxterm to crash unpredictably > > > (very serious because it can take any number of child processe

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-06-25 Thread George Danchev
roxterm_1.18.4-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > The changes file includes 1.18.3-1 which was not uploaded because my > usual sponsor, George Danchev, had reservations > <http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-mentors@lists.debian.org/msg68488.html&

Re: RFS: myscreen

2010-06-20 Thread George Danchev
Clément Mondon writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, some pointers you may want to address: * [lintian ] you want to copy the 'name ' from debian/control to the tail of your last entry in debian/changelog (or contrariwise), since they differ in the spelling of the first name and lintian rigthfully assum

Re: RFS: egroupware (fixes critical bug)

2010-06-20 Thread George Danchev
Thomas Koch writes: > Hi Lars, > > I know you'll hate me for this, but I'd like to suggest to drop eGroupWare > from Debian. You may have invested a lot of time in the package by now. It has been dropped for some months now: #574186, though an old version still left in stable. > eGroupWare has

Re: RFC: Using git/collab-maint/PET for debian-mentors.

2010-06-13 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Tim Retout" : [Please excuse the long email. I welcome comments.] Hi, a lot of helpful technical details, already used for years [1] (though I don't know what PET is), however I still can't see how the 'splitted brain syndrome' is dealt with, the logical problem, i.e. mentee X

Re: RFS: rush

2010-06-13 Thread George Danchev
Tim Retout writes: > On 4 June 2010 10:45, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package. > > I'm afraid it seems you're stuck with me. ;) At DebConf we (the > project) shall have to discuss the sponsoring situation. I will not be attending debconf10, but h

Re: A lot of pending packages

2010-06-12 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Klaus Grue" : Perhaps maintainers should stand up and review some packages of their peers? Absolutely. This already happens a little bit. It would be excellent if more people could do it. Maybe my experience with Fedora and Cygwin could be of interest. As a new packager, I made m

Re: Replacing my key

2010-06-11 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > I'm a sponsored maintainer (of roxterm) and I've just approached a local > DD to have my key signed. He pointed out that SHA1-generated keys are > deprecated so I should probably generate a new, more secure, key. As my > old key is already presumably "in the system" due to e

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-06-02 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > On Sun, 23 May 2010 16:06:40 +0300 Hi, > George Danchev wrote: > > Tony Houghton writes: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.3-1 > > > of my package "roxterm". > > > > > > It builds thes

Re: RFS: sqlitebrowser (updated package)

2010-05-24 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Stefan Haller" : Dear mentors, I upgraded the package “sqlitebrowser” to a new upstream release. The latest release is 2.0b1. That’s why I’ve choosen “1.9+2.0b1-1” as Debian version number. The package uses now the the new dpkg-source format “3.0 quilt”, so I’ve changed many files

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-05-23 Thread George Danchev
roxterm_1.18.3-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > When I released the previous version I was contacted by a DD offering to > sponsor roxterm and help me become a DM, but when I told him George > Danchev had already uploaded it he said I didn't

Re: Possible trimming of build dependencies

2010-05-16 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > On Sun, 16 May 2010 20:51:45 +0300 > > George Danchev wrote: > > Tony Houghton writes: > > > On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300 > > > > > > George Danchev wrote: > > > > Also, it seems to me that build-depending o

Re: Possible trimming of build dependencies

2010-05-16 Thread George Danchev
Jakub Wilk writes: > * George Danchev , 2010-05-16, 20:51: > >>> Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc && docbook-xsl > >>> && docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as > >>> compared to those pulled

Re: Possible trimming of build dependencies

2010-05-16 Thread George Danchev
George Danchev writes: > Tony Houghton writes: > > On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300 > > > > George Danchev wrote: > > > Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc && docbook-xsl && > > > docbook-xml would not extremely trim the

Re: Possible trimming of build dependencies

2010-05-16 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300 > > George Danchev wrote: > > Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc && docbook-xsl && > > docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as compared to > > those pu

Re: Possible trimming of build dependencies

2010-05-16 Thread George Danchev
Jakub Wilk writes: Hi, > * Tony Houghton , 2010-05-16, 16:06: > >>override_dh_auto_build: > >>xsltproc --nonet \ > >> > >> --param make.year.ranges 1 \ > >> --param make.single.year.ranges 1 \ > >>

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.43

2010-05-10 Thread George Danchev
Joachim Reichel writes: > Hi, Hi, > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.43-1.dsc > > > > > > Now, a few things worth mentioning: > > - This version is not compatible with previous version, because: > > --enable=possibleError prints out error message with this ver

Re: Only in pbuilder: CMake can't find FLTK

2010-05-06 Thread George Danchev
Hi, Gary Briggs writes: > I've been spending the last few days packaging up my pet project. I > finally submitted it to the mentors website last night, but I'm aware of > one problem building it, that I'm hoping someone knows how to solve. In > one sentence, like the subject says: > > When buildi

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-05-06 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.18.2-1.dsc Uploaded. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-03-25 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, (excuse moi for the delay) > It doesn't fix any Debian bugs, but it addresses an Ubuntu LP feature > request and several upstream feature requests and bugs. > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.18.1-1.dsc Uploaded. Thanks.

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.42

2010-03-13 Thread George Danchev
Reijo Tomperi writes: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.42-1.dsc Uploaded. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.41

2010-03-08 Thread George Danchev
Reijo Tomperi writes: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.41-2.dsc > > The upload would fix these bugs: #566604 #567759 Uploaded. Your latest two changelog entries are both included. Thanks! -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-03-03 Thread George Danchev
Damien Leone writes: > Hello, > > On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote: > > i.e. whatever is allocated by strdup(3) should be released by > > free(3), and not > > by delete[], even if it works by pure luck (since delete op might be > > implemented by free

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-03-03 Thread George Danchev
Damien Leone writes: > Hello, > > First, thanks for your review. > > On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote: > > * you didn't Close: #XX these bugs from debian/changelog. > > It has been done in a previous package version (0.5-0.1) but my > sponsor did

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-03-03 Thread George Danchev
Damien Leone writes: > Hello, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2 of my package > "ncmpcpp" [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.4.1). > > It builds this binary package: > ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) > > The package appears to be lint

Re: RFS: mbuffer (updated package)

2010-02-27 Thread George Danchev
Peter Pentchev writes: > mbuffer (20091227-1) unstable; urgency=low This is also uploaded. Thank you. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: RFS: s5 (updated package)

2010-02-25 Thread George Danchev
Peter Pentchev writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > s5 (1.1.dfsg.2-2) unstable; urgency=low Uploaded. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lis

Re: RFS: jansson (updated package)

2010-02-03 Thread George Danchev
Petri Lehtinen writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jansson". > > * Package name: jansson > Version : 1.2-1 > Upstream Author : Petri Lehtinen > * URL : http://www.digip.org/jansson/ > * License : MIT > Section :

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.40

2010-01-19 Thread George Danchev
Reijo Tomperi writes: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.40-1.dsc Uploaded. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Debian + Home automation packages

2010-01-17 Thread George Danchev
Eric Lavarde writes: > Hello, > > George Danchev wrote: > > * Generally, your sponsor(s) would want to test the packages, however > > that would need certain home automation infrastructure to be in place > > which is not available everywhere, so you might need to su

Re: Debian + Home automation packages

2010-01-17 Thread George Danchev
Marc Leeman writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I'm looking for someone that would be interested in sponsoring a number > of packages related to home automation: > > see: > http://plugcomputer.org/plugforum/index.php?topic=824.0 > > Though it is described to run on armel; I've ran it on arm, mips, >

Re: need help with bug

2010-01-15 Thread George Danchev
Ury Stankevich writes: > >I would suggest removing the parallel support altogether, since this is > > only a smallish package and fighting the target dependencies will not > > bring too much of benefits. Agreed? > > Hello, > > can you check the fixed package ? > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.ne

Re: need help with bug #564394

2010-01-13 Thread George Danchev
Ury Stankevich writes: > Hi, Hi, > i can't repeat this bug.. You can try with: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS='parallel=4' dpkg-buildpackage ... and maybe you need to try that several times to reproduce. > I suspect it can be caused by errors in debian/rules, since in current > version of stx-btree i use `

Re: RFS: s5 (more DFSG free, refreshed Debian packaging)

2010-01-09 Thread George Danchev
Peter Pentchev writes: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 06:18:07PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Peter Pentchev (07/01/2010): > > > Dear mentors, > > > > Hi, > > > > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > > > if nobody beats me to it, I could have a look tonight (UTC+1). IRC >

Re: RFS: procserv

2010-01-04 Thread George Danchev
Ralph Lange writes: Hi, > On Sat 02 Jan 2010 3:42:49 George Danchev wrote: > > Good. There are some minor nuisances left, non of them critical, but I'd > > guess it would be kind of a shame to upload a simple package like that > > with these left in place: > >

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-01-02 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 23:44:40 +0200 > > George Danchev wrote: > > I decided to test the new option as mentioned in the changelog "Added > > always_show_tabs option", however I got lost in how the user is > > supposed to change that opt

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-01-02 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.17.1-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The package can be found o

Re: RFS: procserv

2010-01-02 Thread George Danchev
Ralph Lange writes: > Hi, Hi, > Turned out that a build-gone-wild had messed up my build directory and > my cleanup was incomplete. Everything's nice when done in a clean > environment: no Makefile, no .deps remain. > I removed the .hg* stuff (inherited from upstream repo, it's actually > not in

Re: RFS: procserv

2009-12-31 Thread George Danchev
Ralph Lange writes: > Hi, > > thanks for having a look. > > On Thu 31 Dec 2009 4:26:04 George Danchev wrote: > > This looks good, perhaps except the capital 'S' in the middle of the > > application name and the man-page, but I can imagine they had thei

Re: RFS: procserv

2009-12-31 Thread George Danchev
Ralph Lange writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "procserv". > > * Package name: procserv > Version : 2.5.0-3 > Upstream Author : Ralph Lange > * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/procserv/ > * License : GPLv3 > Secti

Re: RFS: yajl (updated package)

2009-12-30 Thread George Danchev
John Stamp writes: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.8-1 > of my package "yajl". > > It builds these binary packages: > libyajl-dev - Yet Another JSON Library - development files > libyajl-doc - Yet Another JSON Library - library documentation > libyajl1 - Y

Re: How to handle source code dependencies?

2009-12-28 Thread George Danchev
Matthias Klumpp writes: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:21:10 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez > > wrote: > > Does Pascal have no notion of a shared library? > > It has, but the GLScene solution does not use it. > > > Nope, that set of components would be in a separate shared library and > > the > > > applica

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-12-28 Thread George Danchev
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes: > George Danchev: > > > I also uploaded a new upstream version 1.3.6p1. > > > > Uploaded with the last two changelog entries of yours included. > > Can you please upload poco-doc too. Thanks! Sure, thanks for the poke. Uploaded with

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-12-26 Thread George Danchev
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes: > George Danchev: > > I'm still waiting for an answer to this: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00300.html > > Do you think that a symbols file will be the correct solution? I didn't > check the ABI history

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-12-24 Thread George Danchev
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, I'm still waiting for an answer to this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00300.html > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6-1 > of package "poco" and "poco-doc". > > It builds these binary packages: > libpoco-

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-12-20 Thread George Danchev
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, (I'm the usual sponsor of poco and poco-doc, and I'm looking for co- sponsors;-) Some preliminary comments follow: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6-1 > of package "poco" and "poco-doc". > > It builds these binary packag

Re: RFS: dma (bugfixes, debconf, 3.0 (quilt))

2009-12-19 Thread George Danchev
Peter Pentchev writes: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 04:56:45PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-3 > > > of my package "dma", the DragonFly Mail Agent. This

Re: RFS: dma (bugfixes, debconf, 3.0 (quilt))

2009-12-12 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-3 > of my package "dma", the DragonFly Mail Agent. This version > fixes a couple of bugs, updates the debconf translations, and > converts the package to the 3.0 (quilt) source format. > > It builds a single binary

Re: RFS: dma (bugfixes, debconf, 3.0 (quilt))

2009-12-10 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hello Peter, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-3 > of my package "dma", the DragonFly Mail Agent. This version > fixes a couple of bugs, updates the debconf translations, and > converts the package to the 3.0 (quilt) source format. > > It builds a

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.39

2009-12-06 Thread George Danchev
> Reijo Tomperi wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.39-1.dsc > > The upload would fix these bugs: > #554448 false positive resource leak Uploaded. Thank you. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2009-12-05 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.16.3-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > The upload would fix these bugs: 559126 > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.16.3-1.dsc Uploaded. Thank you. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Descr

Re: RFS: shc

2009-12-03 Thread George Danchev
> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shc". > > * Package name: shc > Version : 3.8.6-1 > Upstream Author : Francisco Javier Rosales García > * URL : http://www.datsi.fi.upm.es/~frosal/ > * License : GPL2 > Section : util

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2009-11-28 Thread George Danchev
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:53:09 +0200 --cut-- > > Adding autotools-dev back to build-dependencies fixes it, > > OK, I've added that dependency back. I've duploaded a replacement, but I > haven't changed the version number because I think it's better not to > when it hasn't been released yet. This

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2009-11-27 Thread George Danchev
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:39:25 +0200 > > George Danchev wrote: > > Package looks good and 557049 seems to be addressed as well, at least > > works for me;-). JFYI I just run into some leftovers in the roxterm(1) > > and roxterm- config(1) manpages -- they both cont

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >