tags 283061 help
thanks
Could somebody please NMU?
I didn't get my new key signed yet so I am in no position to perform an
upload.
Thanks,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 01:56, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Package: opendchub
> Version: 0.7.14-1
tags 283061 help
thanks
Could somebody please NMU?
I didn't get my new key signed yet so I am in no position to perform an
upload.
Thanks,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 01:56, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Package: opendchub
> Version: 0.7.14-1
GBP
--
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org
SableVM - LGPL'ed Java VM http://www.sablevm.org
Why SableVM ?!?http://devel.sablevm.org/wiki/Features
GBP
--
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org
SableVM - LGPL'ed Java VM http://www.sablevm.org
Why SableVM ?!?http://devel.sablevm.org/wiki/Features
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from upstream" - yes, this is
a common practice, when the version you want/need to package didn't
contain the proper licensing terms.
HTH
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
--
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.or
from upstream" - yes, this is
a common practice, when the version you want/need to package didn't
contain the proper licensing terms.
HTH
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
--
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.or
;. It seems that debian-legal didn't like
it either. Again you should try to contact upstream and explain
the problem. Dual licensing w/ GPL (or LGPL) would be an option that
would also eliminate all problems mentioned in 1) by eliminating the
need for an exception.
HTH
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
;. It seems that debian-legal didn't like
it either. Again you should try to contact upstream and explain
the problem. Dual licensing w/ GPL (or LGPL) would be an option that
would also eliminate all problems mentioned in 1) by eliminating the
need for an exception.
HTH
way).
On the other hand, as a user, I treat putting names of alternative
packages into Depends field as an important information, which will help
me in case I had troubles running this software. Maybe I should switch
to different JVM to run this app?
Summarizing: in both cases - for an enduser a
way).
On the other hand, as a user, I treat putting names of alternative
packages into Depends field as an important information, which will help
me in case I had troubles running this software. Maybe I should switch
to different JVM to run this app?
Summarizing: in both cases - for an enduser a
root.root /usr/lib/my_util/util
BTW: your wrapper should also check whether the user who claims
to have ran your wrapper actually has *execution rights* to it!
One could play an ld.so trick and execute it (AFAIR). There's
probably more security concerns. You should see perl-suid sou
On (19/05/04 13:14), Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> On (19/05/04 15:54), Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Could it be you mean bash droping the setuid/setgid bits when it is
> > set setuid/setgid? Thats a bash speciality preventing hackers to
> > setuid/gid bash as so many root
root.root /usr/lib/my_util/util
BTW: your wrapper should also check whether the user who claims
to have ran your wrapper actually has *execution rights* to it!
One could play an ld.so trick and execute it (AFAIR). There's
probably more security concerns. You should see perl-suid sou
On (19/05/04 13:14), Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> On (19/05/04 15:54), Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Could it be you mean bash droping the setuid/setgid bits when it is
> > set setuid/setgid? Thats a bash speciality preventing hackers to
> > setuid/gid bash as so many root
this.
The only thing I am afraid of is that there's some quirk we can't see
and that can open a serious security hole. You should at least try
to discuss the implementation once its done (there's not much to do,
right?). Not to mention that you should be absolutely ANAL about
all standard
this.
The only thing I am afraid of is that there's some quirk we can't see
and that can open a serious security hole. You should at least try
to discuss the implementation once its done (there's not much to do,
right?). Not to mention that you should be absolutely ANAL about
all standard
in in a week if you still want your package to be reviewed
and uploaded by me. I am very sorry about it, but I really have a very
unpleseant deadline to deal with.
Cheers,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
--
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org
SableVM - LGPLed JVM http://www.sablevm.org
Why SableVM ?!? http://devel.sablevm.org/wiki/WhySableVM
in in a week if you still want your package to be reviewed
and uploaded by me. I am very sorry about it, but I really have a very
unpleseant deadline to deal with.
Cheers,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
--
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian GNU/Lin
18 matches
Mail list logo
