)
+
+ -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:06:25 -0400
+
noweb (2.11b-8) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
diff -u noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch
noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch
--- noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch
+++ noweb-2.11b/debian
for my
package (though you'll obviously want to rebuild it yourself). You can
download the packages that I built at:
https://debian.uhoreg.ca/experimental/noweb/
Cheers,
Eriberto
2015-03-31 11:55 GMT-03:00 Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org:
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist
, foo might have
version number like 1.2.1+b1). Maybe foo ( 1.2.1++) might work.
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-07-17 20:59 +0200, Hubert Chathi wrote:
Stefan Potyra wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 17 July 2008 15:15:25 Sean McE wrote:
On current packaging there is no way to express the dependency on
upstream version only,
[...]
actually, there is:
Depends: foo (= 1.2.1
Debconf this year to organize any celebrations outside of
Debconf.
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:22:24 +0800, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen this discussed yet, so I just wanted to point out:
Debian will be 15 years old this August 16th. I also notice that
Debconf
.
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
needed, as long as a
source file is still being built?
Yes, unless the package is a native package.
2. If they're needed, what am I doing wrong here, and how do I get
pdebuild to pass the correct command to whatever subprocess needs it?
See above.
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED
versions (0.4.1-x instead
of 0.5.0-2), which I guess is why packages.d.o still finds them even
when you limit your search to sid.
If you limit your search to sid, and some architecture, then it doesn't
find anything.
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key
. gij + classpath. Otherwise, yes, it will
have to go into contrib.
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
10 matches
Mail list logo