Re: RFS swiftmailer new upstream release

2014-05-08 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-05-06 20:16, Nicolas wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for the package swiftmailer that is > already in debian. Upstream delivered a new release. There's no > major changes in debian packaging. I can build the package and > l

Re: Packaging GNUstep automatically

2013-12-26 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 2013-12-26 13:44, Markus Hitter wrote: > >>> volunteer driven software development no longer does such things. >> >> Personally I think that is a bad idea and is detrimental to the health >> of the Free Software community. > > The equitation is simple: resources are limited, so a developer can

Re: Help with architecture not supporting SSE (Was: Bug#656755: libhmsbeagle FTBFS on everything except amd64)

2012-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 01/22/12 14:31, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I have to admit that I do not have any experience with SSE issues. Any advise what to do in cases like this (see build logs linked below)? afaik it is like this: the only architecture in debian that is guaranteed to support SSE instructions in amd

Re: RFS: assimp (2nd try)

2011-08-20 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/19/2011 10:23 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * IOhannes zmölnig , 2011-08-19, 20:03: >> here is my second attempt to find a sponsor (or more reviewers) for my >> package "assimp". thanks for looking at the package again! > > Was debian/TODO supposed

RFS: gem (updated package)

2010-03-19 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
) are usually very busy, I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards IOhannes m zmölnig -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkujn14ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQQfgCgzt8

Re: RFS: gem (updated package) [3rd try]

2009-11-26 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, Barry deFreese wrote: > IOhannes, > > Obviously the preferred method is to create an arch-indep doc package. But > personally for such a small package I would sponsor even with that. (I can't > speak for others though). > sorry to be so naggi

Re: RFS/ITA: gem (updated package) - #4

2009-11-24 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
e - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gem/gem_0.92.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards IOhannes m zmölnig -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enig

RFS: puredata (updated package) [ITA]

2009-11-14 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
net/debian/pool/main/p/puredata/puredata_0.42.5-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. This package has been orphaned by its maintainer Günter Geiger. I would like to adopt the package if it meets your criteria. looking forward to hear from you. Kind regards IOhannes

RFS: gem (updated package) [3rd try]

2009-11-04 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
e. In the meantime i would also be thankful for reviews/comments/gifts/... Kind regards IOhannes m zmölnig -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkryBjUACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvT7sgCg7cqc+SVdFp8bTx