JackTheDipper wrote:
Holger Levsen wrote:
./po/Makefile.in.in also looks problematic:
# Makefile for program source directory in GNU NLS utilities package.
# Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997 by Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
# This file file be copied and used freely without
Holger Levsen wrote:
[..] In future,
please increase the debian revision whenever you publish your package (even
on mentors) again, so that sponsors can look at the diff with debdiff easily.
ah, ok, good to know (debdiff)! I just thought that debian revision
numbers are only incremented
Hi! Thank you very much for your reply!
Holger Levsen wrote:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gnomecc/gnome-color-chooser-0.2.3.tar.gz?modtime=1196203255big_mirror=0
and
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-color-chooser/gnome-color-chooser_0.2.3.orig.tar.gz
differ - why?
Holger Levsen wrote:
The packaging is now explicitly using GPL3 and the path to that version
has been added.
Actually, as you are both upstream and maintainer, why dont you use the same
licence for both? It's definitly less risky...
regards,
Holger (a bit in a hurry atm...)
updated debian policy from 0.7.2 to 0.7.3
removed ${misc:Depends}from debian/control.
removed debhelper comments in debian/rules and debian/watch.
don't know what i could further do on this package.
any comments or the redemptive upload would be great ;-)
best regards,
Jack ;-)
--
To
just to produce some traffic as I'm still searching for a sponsor:
the latest version includes a watch entry for the corresponding
sourceforge page. ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Wise wrote:
please spell-check your package description :)
heh, fixed ;-)
You are missing copyright info from combobox.cc/h, pt.po. The other
.po files need proper copyright info too.
fixed
W: gnome-color-chooser: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/gnome-color-chooser
not fixed.
Ok, uploaded a new package containing a manual page.
Just misinterpreted the policy ;-)
Any further suggestions or is that package now ready for distribution?
best regards,
Jack
Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:18:32 +0100
JackTheDipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
W: gnome-color
Thank you very much for your useful suggestions!
Paul Wise wrote:
E, I guess the diff.gz is empty because you are upstream? Can I
suggest that you put the debian/ directory in the diff.gz instead of
your upstream tarball?
Ok, done.
You didn't file an ITP bug and close it in the
Dear mentors,
I just uploaded the newest upstream version and tried to fulfill the
debian policy.
It's now pbuilder and lintian clean.
I'd very appreciate if someone could take a look whether this package is
ok or even upload it to debian.
Thank you very much in advance!
P.S.: Please CC me!
Dear mentors,
the package is now lintian clean. I'd very appreciate sponsorship or
comments. ;-)
thank you very much in advance,
Jack ;-)
JackTheDipper wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnome-color-chooser.
It's not yet in Debian.
* Package name: gnome-color-chooser
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnome-color-chooser.
It's not yet in Debian.
* Package name: gnome-color-chooser
Version : 0.2.2-1
Upstream Author : JackTheDipper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.punk-ass-bitch.org/gnome-color-chooser
12 matches
Mail list logo
