Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> I am adopting wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages -- I've already
> debianized the newest upstream versions (2.9 and 0.80.0 respectively) and
> fixed a few outstanding bugs. Being a non-maintainer, I'll need a sponsor
> -- would anyone like to volunteer?
i have
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> I am adopting wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages -- I've already
> debianized the newest upstream versions (2.9 and 0.80.0 respectively) and
> fixed a few outstanding bugs. Being a non-maintainer, I'll need a sponsor
> -- would anyone like to volunteer?
i have
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> According to:
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=battery-stats
>
> My package "declares a build time dependency on libapm-dev which cannot
> be satisfied on sh."
SuperH processor. i am not sure what systems use a SuperH CPU, though i
think it
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> According to:
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=battery-stats
>
> My package "declares a build time dependency on libapm-dev which cannot
> be satisfied on sh."
SuperH processor. i am not sure what systems use a SuperH CPU, though i
think it
Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
> > > In this case, should the package just document what the use
> > > should do (it will be different for each MTA) or at least
> > > detect which MTA is installed and copy an example config file
> >
> > Ensu
Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
> > > In this case, should the package just document what the use
> > > should do (it will be different for each MTA) or at least
> > > detect which MTA is installed and copy an example config file
> >
> > Ensu
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:05:57AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > which have that address in it.
> >
> > I sign a uid when these uid's address is not bouncing and the person who
> > claims to belong to this key answers a message encrypted to him sent
> > to the specific uid
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:05:57AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > which have that address in it.
> >
> > I sign a uid when these uid's address is not bouncing and the person who
> > claims to belong to this key answers a message encrypted to him sent
> > to the specific uid
David Roundy wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 11:04:27AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> >
> > but is it realy appropriate for a package to create a new user for a
> > weekly download?
depending upon what other processes will be using the data, and those
that will be starting them, the answer varie
David Roundy wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 11:04:27AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> >
> > but is it realy appropriate for a package to create a new user for a
> > weekly download?
depending upon what other processes will be using the data, and those
that will be starting them, the answer varie
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> If the shared library is internal to the package, it should not be installed
> in the system library path (e.g., /usr/lib). Instead, install it under
> /usr/lib/. You will need to use a wrapper script to add
> /usr/lib/ to LD_LIBRARY_PATH wehn running the program.
what
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> If the shared library is internal to the package, it should not be installed
> in the system library path (e.g., /usr/lib). Instead, install it under
> /usr/lib/. You will need to use a wrapper script to add
> /usr/lib/ to LD_LIBRARY_PATH wehn running the program.
what
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 10:01:14PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> The binary-common rule has lots of dh_* stuff there, including
> dh_compress. I decided that compressing the HTML files would be a bad
> idea, so I modified it to skip that one package using
the dh_compress man page says:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:04:25PM +0100, Wouter Eerdekens wrote:
>
> Another thing is the apache config: it must be edited before one can
> use wcal: I added the following:
there are other webservers besides apache.
like boa.
is there a generic handler to add the cgi information to the webserve
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 09:28:47AM +0100, Falco Cesare wrote:
>
> What would be best?
> 1. A non-free debian package including both sources and needed roms
> 2. Two debian packages: a contrib one including the source and a non-free
> one with the roms only
i'd go the latter route. if there are an
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 09:28:47AM +0100, Falco Cesare wrote:
>
> What would be best?
> 1. A non-free debian package including both sources and needed roms
> 2. Two debian packages: a contrib one including the source and a non-free
> one with the roms only
i'd go the latter route. if there are a
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:38:46PM +0100, Gundolf Kiefer wrote:
>
> I have written a piece of software that I would like to offer for inclusion
> into a future release of Debian
>
> I am not a Debian developer,
>
> How can I proceed further?
one of two ways: you can apply to become a debian dev
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:38:46PM +0100, Gundolf Kiefer wrote:
>
> I have written a piece of software that I would like to offer for inclusion
> into a future release of Debian
>
> I am not a Debian developer,
>
> How can I proceed further?
one of two ways: you can apply to become a debian de
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 11:56:34AM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
>
> In following I call the old version of the package OP, the transition
> package TP, and the game file I want to keep GF.
why not have TP depend upon GF1 GF2 GF3 GF4 GF5 ?
TP is supposed to be a meta-package, right?
upon re-r
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 09:43:38PM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011007 19:44]:
> > Read about the 'apt-ftparchive' program, specifically the 'packages' and
> > 'sources' options to it.
>
> Or, if your like me and a glutton for punishment, try using
> dpkg-sc
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 09:43:38PM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011007 19:44]:
> > Read about the 'apt-ftparchive' program, specifically the 'packages' and
> > 'sources' options to it.
>
> Or, if your like me and a glutton for punishment, try using
> dpkg-s
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:59:03PM -0500, Taral wrote:
>
> I'd prefer to get my new key signed. Anyone?
you should be able to sign the new key with the old key to get it into
the keyring.
-john
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:59:03PM -0500, Taral wrote:
>
> I'd prefer to get my new key signed. Anyone?
you should be able to sign the new key with the old key to get it into
the keyring.
-john
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 07:07:17PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> >
> > manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to sign a key. i have it
~
> > available in HTML at
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
>
> Nice to see you called it 'Manoj's Singing-Protocol' ;)
cr
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 07:07:17PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> >
> > manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to sign a key. i have it
~
> > available in HTML at
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
>
> Nice to see you called it 'Manoj's Singing-Protocol' ;)
c
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> we should also require them to demonstrate a clear understanding of
> PKI as part of the NM process.
manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to sign a key. i have it
available in HTML at
http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysig
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> we should also require them to demonstrate a clear understanding of
> PKI as part of the NM process.
manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to sign a key. i have it
available in HTML at
http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysi
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:00:04PM -0400, Eric Kidd wrote:
> How does one go about finding a sponsor?
> ...
> And it's the bit I apparently need to do first. :-)
do you mean advocate?
-john
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:00:04PM -0400, Eric Kidd wrote:
> How does one go about finding a sponsor?
> ...
> And it's the bit I apparently need to do first. :-)
do you mean advocate?
-john
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 08:11:43PM +0530, Viral wrote:
>
> Does this mean that I can distribute this program in accordance with
> the DFSG. There is no implicit license, just this statement which says
> that the file is released to the public domain.
>
> Would the file be still copyrighted by the
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 08:11:43PM +0530, Viral wrote:
>
> Does this mean that I can distribute this program in accordance with
> the DFSG. There is no implicit license, just this statement which says
> that the file is released to the public domain.
>
> Would the file be still copyrighted by th
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:24:50PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> QEmacs is a tiny full-screen editor with UTF-8 support, a hex mode and
> the ability to edit huge files efficiently:
>
> http://www-stud.enst.fr/~bellard/qemacs/
have you contacted the author? has he given his blessing to
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:24:50PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> QEmacs is a tiny full-screen editor with UTF-8 support, a hex mode and
> the ability to edit huge files efficiently:
>
> http://www-stud.enst.fr/~bellard/qemacs/
have you contacted the author? has he given his blessing t
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:41:58PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> dpkg -s lprng| grep -e "^Status: install ok installed"
> dpkg -s lpr| grep -e "^Status: install ok installed"
>
> It will be very slow, though. Any good way?
how about replacing dpkg -s lprng with
grep -A1 '^Package: lpr$' /var/l
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:41:58PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> dpkg -s lprng| grep -e "^Status: install ok installed"
> dpkg -s lpr| grep -e "^Status: install ok installed"
>
> It will be very slow, though. Any good way?
how about replacing dpkg -s lprng with
grep -A1 '^Package: lpr$' /var/
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:49:41AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > What is the point?
> policy :)
i hate that catch 22.
can't file a bug, since the package is not in debian[1]
can't use undocumented, unless you have a bug ag
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:49:41AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > What is the point?
> policy :)
i hate that catch 22.
can't file a bug, since the package is not in debian[1]
can't use undocumented, unless you have a bug a
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 04:46:55PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't missing build-depends?
build it in a clean chroot, after getting all the files in
build-essential and those listed in build-depends.
if your compile fails, add the missing package
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 04:46:55PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't missing build-depends?
build it in a clean chroot, after getting all the files in
build-essential and those listed in build-depends.
if your compile fails, add the missing packag
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Peter van Rossum wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:24:27PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Please help me clarify one thing.
> >
> > > if name in changelog != name in control file:
> > > upload is NMU
> >
> > Which one should be the name of real "Maint
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Peter van Rossum wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:24:27PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Please help me clarify one thing.
> >
> > > if name in changelog != name in control file:
> > > upload is NMU
> >
> > Which one should be the name of real "Main
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:48:13PM -0500, Andrew D Dixon wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm writing my first module and when I try to run it I get this error:
>
> #insmod hello.o
> hello.o: kernel-module version mismatch
> hello.o was compiled for kernel version 2.2.15
> while this kernel is v
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:48:13PM -0500, Andrew D Dixon wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm writing my first module and when I try to run it I get this error:
>
> #insmod hello.o
> hello.o: kernel-module version mismatch
> hello.o was compiled for kernel version 2.2.15
> while this kernel is
43 matches
Mail list logo
