Dealing with file deletions

Hi, In the last upload of libnetserver-generic-perl I fixed a bug where the test scripts were being installed into the perl path. I did this by moving these scripts into a subdirectory. Now I'm seeing a warning from dpkg-source about it ignoring file deletions. So when the sources are

Dealing with file deletions

Hi, In the last upload of libnetserver-generic-perl I fixed a bug where the test scripts were being installed into the perl path. I did this by moving these scripts into a subdirectory. Now I'm seeing a warning from dpkg-source about it ignoring file deletions. So when the sources are

Re: Should libfile-temp-perl be removed ?

On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 04:26:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Julian Gilbey wrote: I'm currently the Maintainer of libfile-temp-perl which as of perl 5.6.1 is included in the main Perl distribution. As the package is now redundant should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org asking for

Re: Should libfile-temp-perl be removed ?

On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 04:26:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Julian Gilbey wrote: I'm currently the Maintainer of libfile-temp-perl which as of perl 5.6.1 is included in the main Perl distribution. As the package is now redundant should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org asking for

Should libfile-temp-perl be removed ?

Hi, I'm currently the Maintainer of libfile-temp-perl which as of perl 5.6.1 is included in the main Perl distribution. As the package is now redundant should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org asking for it's removal. Thanks -- Jon Along with freedom of speech and freedom of

Request For Sponsor: libfile-temp-perl libnetserver-generic-perl

Hi, I'm currently in the new maintainer queue awainting an AM to be appointed. As this can take some time, I would appreciate someone sponsoring my packages which are ready for uploading to the archive. They are libfile-temp-perl which allows access to Mktemp functions in perl and