Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>
>> Yes, but I haven't filed any RoM nor do my packages conflict with the
>> previous soname.
>> This means that, while I won't provide any newer version for the
>> previous soname (which I can't since upstream changed the API), *both*
>> sonames can be in
Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I just now saw it... you're actually conflicting with libconfig9-dev and
> libconfig++8-dev.
This was a typo, OF COURSE.
Fixed, thanks for pointing it out.
> Apart from that being total nonsense, what are you
> trying to achieve? And how come you're thinking you'
Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> [snip]
>>> Now that you change the soname and all, did you check the reverse
>>> dependencies?
>>>
>> I am not removing any existing soname for now; the new upload simply
>> carries a new soname. Nor do I conflict with any previous soname:
>> Reverse dependencies won'
José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libconfig".
> This release makes available a new upstream version
>
> * Package name: libconfig
> Version : 1.4.4-1
> Upstream Author : Mark A
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * José Luis Tallón , 2010-04-13, 22:15:
>> [snip]
>> and upstream ships a set of (most basic) debian/libconfig9* files
>>
>> ... but in fact the libraries are compiled as ".so.8.1.2", which means
>> 8:1:2
>
> This is not how l
Hi again, mentors
When checking the reference package, as per Jan's suggestion I have
found an apparent oddity, as described below:
Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> I'm not very familiar with shared libraries to be honest. Why don't you
> provide versioned symbols? And did you check for API/ABI breaka
Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:41:06PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libconfig".
>> This release makes available a new upstream version
>>
>> * Packag
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libconfig".
This release makes available a new upstream version
* Package name: libconfig
Version : 1.4.3-1
Upstream Author : Mark A Lindner
* URL : http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/
* License : LGPL-2
Howdy all,
I am looking for someone to upload new versions of couriergraph and
bindgrpah for me:
* couriergraph - Mail statistics RRDtool frontend for Courier-{POP,IMAP}
Version: 0.25-5
Closes: #559278 (unuseable due to a format mismatch in the log parser)
Packaging enhancements
José Luis Tallón wrote:
> * Package name: libconfig
> Version : 1.3.2-2
> Upstream Author : Mark A Lindner
> * URL : http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig
> * License : LGPL-2.1
> Section : libs
>
> It builds these binary package
* Package name: libconfig
Version : 1.3.2-2
Upstream Author : Mark A Lindner
* URL : http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig
* License : LGPL-2.1
Section : libs
It builds these binary packages:
Package: libconfig8
Package: libconfig++8
Package: libconfig8
Pietro Battiston wrote:
> [snip]
>
> pie...@vousci:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.41+dfsg-0.1 ge 1.41-3
> pie...@vousci:~$ echo $?
> 0
>
> am I missing something?!
>
dpkg's manpage / developers' reference / policy / ... specifies that "+
sorts later than anything else"
So, if you want a version *
: libconfig8-dev
Package: libconfig++8-dev
The package can be found at
dget
http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libconfig/libconfig_1.3.2-2.dsc
José Luis Tallón wrote:
> The source package is available at:
>
> http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/libc/
: libconfig8: still interested ?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:14:26 +0200
From: Julien Danjou
To: José Luis Tallón
References: <4ad21701.2060...@adv-solutions.net>
José Luis Tallón wrote:
> If you are too busy / unable / unwilling to sponsor this upload, just
> say so and I&#
Hi, Rogério
Rogério Brito wrote:
> Dear mentors (with CC to debian-powerpc),
>
> I intend to package a heartbeat program for an embedded computer
> (actually, a NAS) based on PowerPC, the Kurobox.
>
Yup, your thread on -devel is most detailed.
> The original firmware of the Kurobox is non-free,
Hi, mentors
I still have some packages needing sponsoring
- Couriergraph
- Bindgraph
- LCDproc
- libsieve
Could please take on them so that we can release with really useable
packages of those, please?
My most sincere thanks to Thijs Kinkhorst for making the updated
up-imapproxy pa
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi J.L.,
>
> On Sunday 9 March 2008 01:57, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
>> * imapproxy 1.2.6-1
>> http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/mail/imapproxy/up-imapproxy
>> _1.2.6-1.dsc
>>
>
> I've taken a look at
These are three updates containing some needed fixes.
Please upload at your earliest convenience.
* couriergraph 0.25-4
http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/admin/couriergraph/couriergraph_0.25-4.dsc
* bindgraph 0.2a-3
http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/admin/bindgraph/bin
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, February 4, 2008 14:21, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
>> Any of you with "upload powers" has some time left to sign and
>> upload some packages?
>>
>> I have a little too many bugs waiting for an upload to be fixed,
>
Hi all,
Any of you with "upload powers" has some time left to sign and
upload some packages?
I have a little too many bugs waiting for an upload to be fixed,
some of them quite old already. My usual sponsors have been much too
busy as of lately. Anyone wants to volunteer?
Please CC
gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:27:26 -0200, Fernando M.M. wrote:
>
>
>> Althought i have already seen some old discussion about packing the
>> webmail Roundcube (1) i have not found the package using the
>> package search (2).
>>
> [..]
>
>> Is someone working on it?
>>
. I'm total
>>>newbie in debian packaging system, but I was missing this program so I've
>>>created package myself. Is anyone interested in this? Is anyone willing
>>>to help me to bring this package to "uploadable" state?
>>>
>>>
&
Jorge Salamero Sanz wrote:
>On Tuesday 01 November 2005 12:11, Michal Vanco wrote:
>
>
>>I've created my very first debian package of kchmviewer-1.1. I'm total
>>newbie in debian packaging system, but I was missing this program so I've
>>created package myself. Is anyone interested in this? Is a
The License reproduced hereunder comes from "AlterMIME". It seems quite
similar to a modified BSD license, but there are some points which make me
suspect it could be non-free... can somebody please check it and offer some
advice?
I will forward this issue to Debian-legal in some days time if we
The License reproduced hereunder comes from "AlterMIME". It seems quite
similar to a modified BSD license, but there are some points which make me
suspect it could be non-free... can somebody please check it and offer some
advice?
I will forward this issue to Debian-legal in some days time if we
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java AWT for Debian?
From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 22:09:22 +0200
Organization: Blackdown Java-Linux Team
Lines: 23
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09000
At 17:17 02/06/2003 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
Hi!
> Regarding my recently packaged "webCDwriter" [
> http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/jhaeger/webCDwriter/ ], i have found
> *the* p
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Java AWT for Debian?
From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 22:09:22 +0200
Organization: Blackdown Java-Linux Team
Lines: 23
User
At 17:17 02/06/2003 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
Hi!
> Regarding my recently packaged "webCDwriter" [
> http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/jhaeger/webCDwriter/ ], i have found
> *the* p
Hi all
Regarding my recently packaged "webCDwriter" [
http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/jhaeger/webCDwriter/ ], i have found *the*
problem: It needs AWT to be compiled
This has not been a problem before, since upstream includes an already
compiled and signed applet in JAR format... yet
No
Hi all
Regarding my recently packaged "webCDwriter" [
http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/jhaeger/webCDwriter/ ], i have found *the*
problem: It needs AWT to be compiled
This has not been a problem before, since upstream includes an already
compiled and signed applet in JAR format... yet
At 09:27 29/05/2003 +0200, you wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 12:44:22AM -0400, Deedra Waters wrote:
[...]
> | > If you look at the packages description, you will see thatit says "This
> | > module provides the Perl bindings to libcurl." In the description it
> | > tells what the package is.
> | C
At 09:27 29/05/2003 +0200, you wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 12:44:22AM -0400, Deedra Waters wrote:
[...]
> | > If you look at the packages description, you will see thatit says "This
> | > module provides the Perl bindings to libcurl." In the description it
> | > tells what the package is.
>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 11:53:08 +0200
To: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Querying what packages are installed in postinst
At 11:26 27/05/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Alan!
You wrote:
> For the next version of a
At 08:28 27/05/2003 +, you wrote:
For the next version of a package which I currently have sponsored in
Debian (mozilla-mozgest) I want to add support for mozilla-firebird
(preliminary packages are avalible from
http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/i386) and mozilla-snapshot. The
problem
At 23:34 12/05/2003 +0200, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:35:23PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> The question is:
> - Is jdk a *real* build-dependency ?
What is *real*? How do you define *real*? If you're talking about what
you can feel, w
Following a suggestion from my sponsor, i place this question so that you
can point me in the righ direction.
( a bit long, sorry )
I have packaged webCDwriter [
http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/jhaeger/webCDwriter ] ( and updated three
upstream versions since I started! :-| )
Package name
At 08:43 10/05/2003 +0200, you wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 12:53:16AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
[...]
> *Since the program needs some SUID executables I do two things:
> - tell the user to run 'dpkg-reconfigure cdrecord' to enable recording for
> unprivileged users;
At 01:33 10/05/2003 +0100, you wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 12:53:16AM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
> I have recently packaged webCDwriter [
> http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/jhaeger/webCDwriter/ ] ( Closes:
#98594 ),
> but I have some questions to solve before i can ask my sponsor to
Hi all,
I have recently packaged webCDwriter [
http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/jhaeger/webCDwriter/ ] ( Closes: #98594 ),
but I have some questions to solve before i can ask my sponsor to upload it
for me to the archive. He suggested me to ask here.
[ I will leave some policy-related quest
At 00:55 12/04/2003 +0200, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 12:24:33AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> - Debconfig-fied installation
> When the postinst script launches the daemon ( by means of
> /etc/init.d/webcdwriter ), dpkg just
Hi all fellow Debian users! ( just subscribed )
Wanting to become a Debian Developer, i took the 'challenge' from the WNPP
list to package WebCDwriter [
http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/jhaeger/webCDwriter/ ].
Now, sometime later, I have the package mostly finished, including:
- Two
42 matches
Mail list logo
