Or, possibly, in more than one patch.
Patrick Baggett wrote:
>Hi Andreas,
>
>I'm pretty decent at C++. The lines 120 and 134 contain the same function
>prototype, i.e. the return value is the same, the name is the same, and the
>parameter count/type/number are the same. The compiler cannot tell
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:18:00 +0100
Dennis van Dok wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I have a question regarding configuration file changes.
>
>
> My question is whether this method sufficiently implements the policy,
> or if there are other ways to go about it.
I am not a mentor, but i'll chime in an
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 23:22:34 -0600
Paul Elliott wrote:
> On Saturday, November 19, 2011 07:27:14 PM you wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:03:19PM -0600, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > > Is there any requirement that a shared library be reentrant, if the
> > > upstream wrote it that way?
> > >
> > >
3 matches
Mail list logo