Re: gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found

Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-10-13 05:07 +0200, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > >> >> What should I do to make dpkg-source recognize my keys? Should I add them >> to somewhere? > > Yes, export them to ~/.gnupg/trustedkeys.gpg. > > Sven I used gpg --no-

Re: gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found

Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi > wrote: > >> gpgv: Signature made Tue 12 Oct 2010 10:01:24 PM EDT using DSA key ID >> 8D556DA9 > > Firstly, you might want to transition to a stronger key (4096 RSA > perhaps): > >

gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found

hanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/i937pd$vo...@dough.gmane.org

Re: unrepresentable changes to source

Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Kamaraju S > Kusumanchi wrote: >> dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to >> texmacs-1.0.7.2/debian/.rules.swp: binary file contents changed > > This is why... > > Close debian/rules opened in

unrepresentable changes to source

wnload the package afresh. But occurs only when I make some changes here and there and run dpkg-buildpackage repeatedly. Any idea what causes this error? Also, is there a way to fix it? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

Re: beginner's questions

can be > properly packaged? Or do i simply submit the patch and the maintainers > worry about the rest? What is it more useful for the maintainer? maintainers would definitely prefer patches. No need to send the whole package. You can send the patch to the bug report direct

suggestions for the new maintainer's guide

ad of dpkg-buildpackage would be much more helpful. 2) It would be nice if the maint-guide has a section on gpg and explains how to sign the package a bit clearly than just referring to their man pages. hth raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/

Re: unable to reproduce FTBFS of 459028

Michael Tautschnig wrote: > In my opinion you should indeed revert the NMU and close the bug (without > a version number). > Thanks for the reply Michael. The bug was already closed by Ana at the time of NMU. Does that mean I have to reopen it and then close it? Sorry if this is a trivial questi

unable to reproduce FTBFS of 459028

: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' System/Classes/url.hpp: In function 'bool is_wildcard(url)': The build proceeds without any errors. Could someone help me out as to what I am doing wrong? My gut feeling is that an NMU was performed on texmacs but the actual bug is in some other package (gcc?). Can someone confirm? Should I revert the NMU? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: removal of unneeded packages installed by pbuilder

Paul Wise wrote: > On Feb 16, 2008 11:13 AM, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Is there any equivalent to 'apt-get autoclean' to remove unnecessary >> packages installed by pbuilder? I looked in >> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dan

removal of unneeded packages installed by pbuilder

Is there any equivalent to 'apt-get autoclean' to remove unnecessary packages installed by pbuilder? I looked in http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/software/pbuilder-doc/pbuilder-doc.html but could not find anything. thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/p

updating the patches

iners solve this problem and what tools you guys use etc., regards raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: signing packages from a different machine

86.changes at /usr/bin/dupload line 223 So mentors.debian.net requires packages to be signed. Is there any way around that? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

signing packages from a different machine

any suggestions there. thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: unable to build gdb from source

Raphael Geissert wrote: > You should fill a bug against the cdbs package; and if you can't wait > for the maintainer to patch it then build it from a directory which > doesn't have spaces in its name. > I filed it as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=43814

unable to build gdb from source

uld I file a bug? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ dpkg-buildpackage: source package is gdb dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 6.6.dfsg-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: dpkg-buildpackage and fakeroot

Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:19:35PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: >> Hi all > >> Can someone please tell me the difference between > >> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot >> fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage >> fakeroot dpkg-buildpack

dpkg-buildpackage and fakeroot

Hi all Can someone please tell me the difference between dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot Which one should I use for building packages in Debian? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288

Re: Packages without a manteiner

Nicolas Valcarcel wrote: > thank you. One more thing, is there any printable version of Debian New > Maintainers' Guide ? > apt-get install maint-guide Afterwards, the pdf version of the file can be found in /usr/share/doc/maint-guide hth raju -- Kamaraju S K

Re: staying in stable but compiling for sid

Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Hi all > I want to run software only from Stable (ie Etch) when I am doing > non-debian related work. However, when I am doing debian related work > (ex :- fixing some bugs in the BTS) I want to work in unstable (ex :- > compile packages for sid

Re: generating patches for debian packages

Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Is there > any easy way? Are there any books which deal with practical issues such as > these? > Thanks for all the excellent replies. I finally settled with pdebuild, interdiff. That combination just rocks and is so easy than the clumsy method I w

index for maint-guide

Hi I think it would be useful, if we can add an index to the maint-guide. It would be cool if index can be added to other documents such as debian-reference-en, but I am more concerned for developer's documents. I can file a wishlist bug, if necessary. thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusum

staying in stable but compiling for sid

's rc files may not work with vim 6's rc files etc.,) Is there any other elegant solution? I have heard about chroot, pbuilder etc., Will they be of any help in this scenario? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.bl

generating patches for debian packages

do is unpack the source again into another temp directory and then use "diff -r" and then delete the temp directory. But this is time consuming. Is there any easy way? Are there any books which deal with practical issues such as these? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.peo