Daniel Baumann debian.org> writes:
> > So I removed the meep-doc and clean the debian/rules and compile the
> > package
> > and
> > found my error for the -dev package. The architecture was set to "all".
> > With
> > "any" it work now, the -dev package are not empty anymore \o/
>
> there mus
Daniel Baumann debian.org> writes:
> Loic Le Guyader wrote:
> > The package is lintian clean. But I have problem with the -dev packages.
> > They
> > are empty and I don't understand why.
>
> it wasn't empty here.
Damn, for me dpkg -c libmeep-mpi-
e glad if someone can check and upload this package for me.
Kind regards
Loic Le Guyader
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz nul-unu.com> writes:
> One minor nitpick: Your .diff.gz contains
> libharminv.postinst.debhelper
> libharminv.postrm.debhelper
> libharminv.substvars
> from the previous version, I guess. Please remove those.
Indeed, thanks. Problem solved in the new upload
http://
Loic Le Guyader laposte.net> writes:
> Yaroslav Halchenko onerussian.com> writes:
> > > >-I, --display-info
> > > > Display informational ("I:") tags as well. They are
> > > > normally suppressed.
&g
Yaroslav Halchenko onerussian.com> writes:
> > >-I, --display-info
> > > Display informational ("I:") tags as well. They are
> > > normally suppressed.
> > I mean, lintian -i nor lintian -I doesn't report me anything.
> Upgrade lintian may be?
No, the solution
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz nul-unu.com> writes:
> You need to move the libharmin.so symlink to the -dev package, as it
> is only used when developing with the library and not at runtime.
done.
> Those files belong in the -dev package, too. And, unless you know
> there's specific reason, you sho
7 matches
Mail list logo
