Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

thinking about to delete the unstable. I'll maintain just the debian/latest for development, debian/ for backports, security and propose-update and mentioned on DEP-14. Thanks, Lucas Castro Em 11/05/2024 03:44, Tobias Frost escreveu: On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 08:02:17PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

Em 06/05/2024 11:31, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, Hi d-mentors (there's a workflow question below), On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 05:16:54PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: The source builds the following binary packages: foolsm - Link connectivity monitor tool lsm - Link connectivity

Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

Em 24/03/2024 16:50, Lucas Castro escreveu: Em 23/03/2024 13:08, Tobias Frost escreveu: Control: tags -1 moreinfo The source package name is still being renamed, and the source package rename is not explictly stated in the changelog. Source package already kept old project name, only binary

Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

forward to upstream. Already uploaded to mentors. -- tobi Thanks Tobias. On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 22:25:04 -0300 Lucas Castro wrote: Em 06/03/2024 05:49, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 03:29:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: Are you sure you want to change the source

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

Em 06/03/2024 05:49, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 03:29:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures the history of the package on tracker.d.o and it's not really necessary. The upstream has changed

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

REMOVE ME! On 05.03.24 19:29, Lucas Castro wrote: Em 05/03/2024 08:09, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:50:27PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:   * Package name : foolsm Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures the history

Re: Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

Em 05/03/2024 08:09, Daniel Gröber escreveu: Hi Lucas, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:50:27PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: * Package name : foolsm Are you sure you want to change the source package name? Doing so fractures the history of the package on tracker.d.o and it's not really

Bug#1064297: RFS: foolsm/1.0.21-1 -- Link connectivity monitor tool

) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release * debian/watch updated * debian/patches/ cleaned out Regards, -- Lucas Castro OpenPGP_0x42F79A5E0A4D5598.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Is valid for Debian a source code not in English? (was Help to know if a package is valid)

Em 16/08/2022 22:50, braulio escreveu: On 22/08/05 15:36, braulio wrote: Good afternoon. I need help with a situation. I packaged a program under the GPL-3+ license where Upstream wrote all the texts in its native language Pt-Br, and for the packaging, I did all the translation to English,

Bug#970246: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-2 [RC] -- Link connectivity monitor tool

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsm": * Package name : lsm Version : 1.0.4-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : http://lsm.foobar.fi/ * License : GPL-2 Section : utils It builds those binary

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

On 18-12-2016 10:30, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 02:54:18PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> Ready for upload. > The changelog still says 3.6.8. > So, done. -- Lucas Castro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

On 18-12-2016 10:30, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 02:54:18PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> Ready for upload. > The changelog still says 3.6.8. Mind crashing, I've noticed just the 's' missing on standard[s]-version. -- Lucas Castro signature.asc Descript

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

Ready for upload. On 14-12-2016 13:36, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Please remove extra empty lines from the changelog entry. > Why did you enable DH_VERBOSE=1? >

Re: Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

Thank you Eriberto, On 14-12-2016 13:55, Eriberto wrote: > Standards-Version = 3.6.8? (debian/changelog) > > > 2016-12-14 14:36 GMT-02:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : >> Please remove extra empty lines from the changelog entry. >> Why did you enable DH_VERBOSE=1? >> >> -- >> WBR, wRAR

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

On 14-12-2016 13:36, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Please remove extra empty lines from the changelog entry. > Why did you enable DH_VERBOSE=1? > Already fixed. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

y, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-ldap/libpam-ldap_186-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: It fixes #844666 bug. Regards, Lucas Castro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Problems creating babel-polyfill.min.js

t for a single package dependence, but think about all the package that didn't get in Debian yet just because of that dependence. I want to start the works on babel modules packaging soon, jut got some issues about how to split all modules that comes all together in single tarball. -- Lucas Castro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RFS: node-everything.js/1.0.3-1

dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-everything.js/node-everything.js_1.0.3-1.dsc Regards, Lucas Castro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

On 27-07-2016 14:23, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > >> Who missing? I've checked, it's okay. > > > you right > >> About that, it's a new version with some patches I've forwarded. >> I'll wait for this version get in Debian to investigate the new version >> changes. > > I can sponsor, or

Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

's a new version with some patches I've forwarded. I'll wait for this version get in Debian to investigate the new version changes. > G. -- Lucas Castro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

On 22-07-2016 00:31, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:25:00PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> I've got a little busy, but I uploaded a reviewed package, >> if you can take a look at it I'll thanks. >> >> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lsm/

Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

On 21-05-2016 12:21, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:09:14PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> On 21-05-2016 11:59, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:31:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >>>> But I don't think I need to writ

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

On 21-05-2016 11:59, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:31:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> On 14-05-2016 20:45, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> Only upon checking the syslog I see: >>> May 15 00:30:37 umbar lsm[12853]: no targets found in config file &g

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

On 14-05-2016 20:45, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:22:13AM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> On 13-05-2016 11:46, Adam Borowski wrote: >>>> On 10-05-2016 02:43, Lucas Castro wrote >>>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

On 13-05-2016 11:46, Adam Borowski wrote: >> On 10-05-2016 02:43, Lucas Castro wrote >>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsm" >>> >>> * Package name: lsm >>> Upstream Author : Mika Ilmaranta <il...@nullnet.fi> >>

Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

Hello, I made some changes at the packages, if someone can sponsor I'll thanks. On 10-05-2016 02:43, Lucas Castro wrote > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor f

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsm" * Package name: lsm Version : 1.0.4-1 Upstream Author : Mika Ilmaranta * URL :

Need help to fix hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-relro

I'm getting harderning issue on packaging xmbmon. I already looked at https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening, but no success. I uploaded the source to mentors[1], and the attachment is the build log. [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmbmon/xmbmon_2.05-8.dsc -- contatos: Celular: ( 99

Re: Need help to fix hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-relro

Gianfranco, No problem about about that on irc. I think I should take a time on another package, then mailed here. and if anyone know about this, it's fine. I really spent much time on this package, and learned a lot with it. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna

Re: Need help to fix hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-relro

' LDFLAGS += '-lfoo' override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- --enable-foo Cheers, Alex 2015-08-11 21:05 GMT+08:00, lucas castro lucascastrobor...@gmail.com: Gianfranco, No problem about about that on irc. I think I should take a time on another package, then mailed here

Re: Need help to fix hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-relro

Okay, confirmed, solved the hardening-no-relro, and Now I can see I make a mistake on subject, It was to be hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-fortify-functions. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:50 AM, lucas castro lucascastrobor...@gmail.com wrote: I'll do that, and send to mentors. On Tue, Aug

Bug#792443: RFS: mirage/0.9.5.1-4 [QA]

GMT-03:00 Lucas Castro lucascastrobor...@gmail.com: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mirage This orphaned packages required some lintian corrections and I had done, it already has two P lintians

Bug#792443: RFS: mirage/0.9.5.1-4 [QA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mirage This orphaned packages required some lintian corrections and I had done, it already has two P lintians, but it is its homepage fields and signature that I didn't found. *