Hi,
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 19:42:01 -0800
Russ Allbery wrote:
> I don't think you need to change anything about Built-Using. That
> seems like exactly the sort of reason anticipated by DFSG
> compliance. The clarification in Policy is because the previous
> wording would have required literally e
Hi mentors,
I read the update in policy 4.1.3 and I'm not sure how to handle the
change / clarification of the Built-Using control field for the
syslinux package (which I maintain in the debian-cd team). I have two
questions:
The syslinux-efi binary package contains parts of the gnu-efi package
Hi Gabriel,
it seems you are getting the knack of it quickly :) . I don't have
any additional feedback. I hope you're able to find a sponsor soon.
You can also look at the available packaging teams [1]. For your
package it looks like the Debian Multimedia team [2] would be the most
suitable on
Hi Gabriel,
thanks for the git link, makes things easier for me.
> Where did you get pragha-1.3.3.tar.gz from?
> I got it from
> https://github.com/pragha-music-player/pragha/archive/v1.3.3.tar.gz.
I got the same one (but I used `uscan -dd` to download, which uses the
debian/watch file and also
Hi Gabriel,
thanks for improving upon our suggestions.
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:15:41 -0300
"Gabriel F. T. Gomes" wrote:
> Lukas,
> In that same message [1], you suggested the use of a version control
> system, but I don't know where to make it public (I know that alioth
> is being discontinued, s
Hi Gabriel,
thanks for working on packaging pragha for Debian!
First, let's get your bugs in shape:
1. Correct the metadata of the wnpp bug [1] for pragha
You should set yourself as the owner of that bug and retitle it from
RFP (request for packaging) to ITP (intent to package). The easiest
w
Hi Adam,
thanks for sponsoring. Regarding the git repository I have a few more
requests. Please:
* point the HEAD to debian/master
cd /git/collab-maint/gmrun.git
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/debian/master
* remove the master branch
* push the tags to alioth as well (I've just pushe
Control: retitle -1 RFS: gmrun/0.9.2-3 [ITA]
My last commit accidentally increased the Debian version, corrected.
pgpno1f7qLX5W.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the gmrun package, which I intend to
adopt. I've uploaded the current state to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/gmrun
I've done the packaging using git. You can access my repository from
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 04:04:24 +0200
Adam Borowski wrote:
> As the original maintainer declared the license as GPL-2 (only), it
> seems obvious to me this applies to the packaging as well. I'd thus
> not even bother contacting him and assume everything uses that
> license.
Ok, thanks for looking i
Hi mentors,
I declared my ITA gmrun and I have two questions:
1. The current debian/copyright is written in a way that it does not
apply to the debian/* files. So, as far as I can tell, the previous
maintainers have not stated under which license they make their work
available. Should
Hi Hugo,
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 18:25:04 +0200
Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> Are you already a member of the team ? If yes, could you move your git
> repository to
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-security/arpwatch.git ?
I've now officially joined the team, the repository is available at
that URL.
I'
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:24:04 + (UTC)
Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> - $(INSTALL) -m 555 -o bin -g bin arpwatch $(DESTDIR)$(BINDEST)
> + $(INSTALL) -Dm 555 -o bin -g bin arpwatch $(DESTDIR)$(BINDEST)
>
>
> this should work too (as said above) and is less invasive :)
As everybod
Hi Christian,
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 14:30:24 +0200
Christian Seiler wrote:
> The problem is that dirs is only interpreted by dh_installdirs, which
> is typically run after dh_auto_install, so that wouldn't actually
> solve your problem.
It does solve the problem (i.e. the error is gone if `usr/sbin
Hi Hugo,
thanks again for the review and the comments!
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 18:25:04 +0200
Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> > * debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
>
> I wouldn't override debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature btw.
Ok, I will revert that override.
> > If I remove `usr/sbin` from dirs, b
Hi Hugo,
thanks a lot for looking at this. I have made some changes to the
package based on your feedback, pushed them to my git repository and
uploaded the new version to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/arpwatch
Some further questions and comments follow inline below.
On Tue, 4 Apr
Hi security tools packaging team,
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 23:03:19 +0200
Lukas Schwaighofer wrote:
> Gianfranco suggested also asking the pkg-security-team for possible
> sponsors. It would be great if one of you could have a look and
> provide guidance! If team maintenance is be possible,
s (documented in
NEWS). I would be happy if someone has ideas how to avoid that.
Gianfranco suggested also asking the pkg-security-team for possible
sponsors. It would be great if one of you could have a look and provide
guidance! If team maintenance is be possible, I'd like that very
much
/2017 12:24 AM, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote:
> > The easiest way for me to check if the converted database is
> > up-to-date is to depend on the existence
> > of /var/lib/ieee-data/.lastupdate . Is that ok?
>
> As far as I understand it, yes.
>
> That said: what do you
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:04:01 +0200
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I try to package pftools[1]. Unfortunately autoreconf throws the
> following error:
>
>dh_autoreconf -O--no-parallel
> configure.ac:6: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_NOTICE
> If this token and others are legitimat
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Mar 2017
22:30:39 +0200 Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 03/26/2017 09:19 PM, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand what you mean… should the ethercodes.dat
> > file be removed / used from a different package?
>
> Yes. See also:
> ht
Hi Bastien,
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:56:58 +
Bastien Roucaries wrote:
> Will ne also nice to repack in ordre to remove oui db
I'm not sure I understand what you mean… should the ethercodes.dat file
be removed / used from a different package?
Thanks
Lukas
pgpQfsxdY1uIw.pgp
Description: Open
Hi,
thanks Vincent and Gianfranco for offering your advice!
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:13:52 + (UTC)
Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> did you consider to merge the work from Fedora?
> they already have a systemd service, and IIRC the project seems
> somewhat dead upstream, so merging their work an
rrent status in the
following git repository in the *staged-changes* branch (this is
work-in-progress and will see force commits):
https://git.somlen.de/arpwatch.git
Thank you
Lukas Schwaighofer
pgpnkBKMlxwpQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
065
and we basically agreed to only fix the RC bug and make further changes
to the package in buster (and possibly experimental) only.
Thank you
Lukas Schwaighofer
pgp8T5mHeZ7nS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
25 matches
Mail list logo
