Re: File Versioning for the KDE Desktop...

2024-10-04 Thread Martin Steigerwald
eparate /home on SLES based distributions. Just some thoughts and ideas on how to approach your project. Maybe you thought about these already. Do as you wish with the ideas I provided. No need to take time to reply to me about it. All the best for your project. Thanks again, -- Martin

Bug#1061087: Fixed reprotest

2024-08-13 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Phil, thank you very much. Upstream already fixed the issue and I created a new build which builds successfully: https://salsa.debian.org/mdosch/bash-unit/-/jobs/6118128 Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1061087: RFS: bash-unit/2.3.1-1 [ITP] -- bash_unit - bash unit testing

2024-08-05 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Phil, On 04.08.2024 10:17, Phil Wyett wrote: 2. Lintian [3]: Issue 'Standards-Version' in 'debian/control' requires updating to latest 4.7.0. Fixed. 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Issue I have created an issue upstream [1] as I think this should be fixed there.

Bug#1061087: Mentors alive again

2024-08-04 Thread Martin Dosch
Ha, just as I wrote my last mail another attempt at uploading to mentors finally went through. You can check it at https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bash-unit/bash-unit_2.3.1-1.dsc Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1061087: Mentors broken

2024-08-04 Thread Martin Dosch
in _communicate stdout = self._translate_newlines(stdout, File "/usr/lib/python3.11/subprocess.py", line 1084, in _translate_newlines data = data.decode(encoding, errors) ^ UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x9c in position 684: invalid start byte Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1061087: RFS: bash-unit/2.3.1-1 [ITP] -- bash_unit - bash unit testing

2024-08-03 Thread Martin Dosch
very much, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1061087: RFS: bash-unit/2.3.1-1 [ITP] -- bash_unit - bash unit testing

2024-07-17 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Otto, thanks for the info. I wasn't aware of that failure. I allowed it to fail for now. Best regards, Martin Am 14.07.2024 15:06, schrieb Otto Kekäläinen: Hi! I noticed the CI at https://salsa.debian.org/mdosch/bash-unit/-/pipelines/665767 is failing on reprotest. If you are u

Re: Bug#1069083: RFS: runit-services/0.7.2 -- UNIX init scheme with service supervision (services)

2024-05-11 Thread Martin Steigerwald
cement are quite annoying as well. Sure we are still talking about a (small) minority of Debian users here. Hope this helps regarding the review of the package and the sponsoring. In case any further changes need to be tested before upload, I am willing to do that. Best, -- Martin

Bug#1061087: RFS: bash-unit/2.1.0-1 [RFP] -- bash_unit - bash unit testing

2024-04-06 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Andrey, On 06.04.2024 19:25, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: You need to use bash_unit from the package. Likely as simple as "./bash_unit". thanks, that's it. Just pushed the changes and uploaded to mentors. Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1061087: RFS: bash-unit/2.1.0-1 [RFP] -- bash_unit - bash unit testing

2024-04-06 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Andrey, On 06.04.2024 13:36, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: Hi Martin, you added a B-D on itself, I assume it's to run build-time tests, buit the idea of build-time tests is to use the software being package, Do you know how to achieve this? When I remove the build-dep on itself the

Bug#1061087: RFS: bash-unit/2.1.0-1 [RFP] -- bash_unit - bash unit testing

2024-04-05 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Andrey, thank you for the valuable feedback. I hope it is all properly settled now. I just uploaded a new build to mentors and pushed the changes to the repo. Thank you very much, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: bash-unit/2.3.1-1 [ITP] -- bash_unit - bash unit testing

2024-03-16 Thread Martin Dosch
dium . * Initial release. (Closes: #839210) Regards, -- Martin Dosch signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1061087: RFS: bash-unit/2.1.0-1 [RFP] -- bash_unit - bash unit testing

2024-01-17 Thread Martin Dosch
dium . * Initial release. (Closes: #839210) Regards, -- Martin Dosch signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1058585: RFS: dhcpcd/1:10.0.5-5 -- DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 dual-stack client

2023-12-13 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
[patches] - Remove all GNU/Hurd patches. Let Hurd porters handle that. * [control] = Breaks/Replaces: dhcpcd5 using (<< ${binary:Version}) variable. * [rules] + Add --no-stop-on-upgrade --no-restart-after-upgrade (Closes: #1057959). Regards, - -- Martin-Éric Rac

Bug#1057262: RFS: upgrade-system/1.9.2.0 -- command for upgrading and sanitizing a Debian system

2023-12-02 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "upgrade-system": * Package name : upgrade-system Version : 1.9.2.0 Upstream contact : Martin-Éric Racine

Bug#1056690: RFS: dhcpcd/1:10.0.5-4 -- DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 dual-stack client

2023-11-28 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
ecently mentioned that he had already ported an earlier release and offered to look into updating his port. I'll let him take care of that part. Martin-Éric

Bug#1056690: RFS: dhcpcd/1:10.0.5-4 -- DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 dual-stack client

2023-11-24 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 9:30 PM Daniel Gröber wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 09:03:37PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:59 PM Daniel Gröber wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 06:55:44PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > >

Bug#1056690: RFS: dhcpcd/1:10.0.5-4 -- DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 dual-stack client

2023-11-24 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:59 PM Daniel Gröber wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 06:55:44PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > dhcpcd (1:10.0.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* Attempt to fix the GNU/Hurd build. > > + 003_fix_FTBFS_on_Hurd.patch > >

Bug#1056690: RFS: dhcpcd/1:10.0.5-4 -- DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 dual-stack client

2023-11-24 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
cy=medium . * Attempt to fix the GNU/Hurd build. + 003_fix_FTBFS_on_Hurd.patch Regards, Martin-Éric -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEyJACx3qL7GpObXOQrh+Cd8S017YFAmVg1ZAACgkQrh+Cd8S0 17b/7RAAoa1y2n29K6JsaI0Hnq+iFo0GEu638+AFl3tMfUwUgZt4s9hpqsrzkOcz T2LtE

Re: Bug#1053963: RFS: termpaint/0.3.0-3 [RC] -- low level terminal access - headers

2023-10-17 Thread Martin Hostettler
to any other places where you feel that attribution is missing. But this is all quite of topic here, so let's take that to private mail or to the upstream issue tracker. Regards, - Martin ¹ which even lead me to report some improvments to xterm some years ago.

Re: Bug#1053963: RFS: termpaint/0.3.0-3 [RC] -- low level terminal access - headers

2023-10-17 Thread Martin Hostettler
adeoffs between say ncurses and termpaint. Or termpaint and s-lang or ... They would need a lot of nouance, and i'm pretty sure i would get it wrong. So i think it is better to be silent on that than to offer something incomplete. As you pointed out, it is not even a alternative to ncurses, because it has a vastly smaller set of supported terminals. - Martin

Bug#1034660: RFS: gummi/0.8.3-1 [Team] -- simple LaTeX editor with live preview

2023-04-20 Thread Martin Dosch
ad * New upstream version 0.8.3 (Closes: #1030293, #1012150) Regards, -- Martin Dosch signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt

2023-02-03 Thread Martin Hostettler
[upstream here] On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 16:13:41 +0100 Norwid Behrnd wrote: > > So long for a library, change the name. I don't see why library may not have a descriptive name instead of a short and cryptic one. And the debian package name follows the name of the library it contains. Which is by its

Bug#1024847: VCS

2022-11-26 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, please ignore the wrong Vcs URL, I pushed to https://salsa.debian.org/mdosch/wofi-pass Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1024847: RFS: wofi-pass/0.0~git20221028.869c545-1 [ITP] -- pass support for wofi using wtype

2022-11-26 Thread Martin Dosch
dsc Changes for the initial release: wofi-pass (0.0~git20221028.869c545-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release. (Closes: #1024838) Regards, -- Martin Dosch signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Location for user installed plugin libraries and icons

2021-05-09 Thread Martin Atukunda
On Fri, 7 May 2021, 08:35 Tobias Frost, wrote: > On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 10:58:27AM +1000, Jon Gough wrote: > > The user install plugins can vary between very simple with a config file > and > > a couple of icons up to complex with large data >1GB and hundreds of > icons. > > > > So, if debs must

Bug#985338: RFS: vimb/3.6.0-3 -- vim like browser

2021-03-16 Thread Martin Atukunda
2 Regards, -- Martin Atukunda

Bug#985093: RFS: vimb/3.6.0-1 [ITP] -- vim like browser

2021-03-12 Thread Martin Atukunda
o/projects/vimb-logo/32x32.png Regards, -- Martin Atukunda

Bug#982164: RFS: geda-gaf/1.10.2-2 [ITA] -- GPL EDA -- Electronics design software

2021-02-19 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
gaf/ All the best, ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=index&search=0x7B0F9882 pgpxzKMnvLdgv.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#982164: RFS: geda-gaf/1.10.2-2 [ITA] -- GPL EDA -- Electronics design software

2021-02-18 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Following the the suggestion by Roland, I moved the xorn executable to gedalib-common. In addition I removed the closes clause for #936593 and closed #966736 in the changelog. Lintian complained about inconsistent licenses. So I made debian/copyright aware that certain files are GFDL licensed (with

Bug#982164: RFS: geda-gaf/1.10.2-2 [ITA] -- GPL EDA -- Electronics design software

2021-02-08 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
ce, I am unsure how to proceed on this. Should I act on the bugs? Am I allowed to set tags? If so which would be appropriate? ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=index&search=0x7B0F9882 pgpSMjPT7mL8p.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Howto re-upload to debian-mentors

2021-02-07 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
n of dupload to force the upload. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=index&search=0x7B0F9882 pgpgdtAs6p9Rk.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Howto re-upload to debian-mentors

2021-02-07 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
, though. Can you confirm that this was the correct way to go ahead? Regards, ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=index&search=0x7B0F9882 pgpXIJBjC9qB7.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#982164: RFS: geda-gaf/1.10.2-2 [ITA] -- GPL EDA -- Electronics design software

2021-02-06 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
lacks-main-category according to the policy of pkg-electronics https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-electronics . -- Kai-Martin Knaak Sun, 07 Feb 2021 05:00:20 +0100 . . geda-gaf (1:1.10.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Ahmed El-Mahmoudy ] * Imported Upstream version 1.10.0 * Remove te

Bug#976973: RFS: fonts-aenigma/0.0.20080510.dfsg-3 -- 465 free TrueType fonts by Brian Kent

2020-12-18 Thread martin f krafft
Regarding the following, written by "Gürkan Myczko" on 2020-12-18 at 15:56 Uhr +0100: Sure, mind taking a look, a new upload will be on mentors.d.n soon, I'll need it as Depends for komposter ITP. Done. Let's hope it works, I haven't done this in months ;) --

Bug#976973: RFS: fonts-aenigma/0.0.20080510.dfsg-3 -- 465 free TrueType fonts by Brian Kent

2020-12-09 Thread martin f krafft
you don't find a sponsor, I'll upload this too, but give it a few days, ok? -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing sy

How to submit patches?

2020-06-27 Thread Martin
Hi there! Hopefully this is the correct list. I want to submit some patches to packages: Can you please tell me what the appropriate/standard way is to do that? Thanks in advance! Best, Martin P.S: The link "mentors.debian.net" on https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentors is returning 404.

Bug#861490: update

2017-09-28 Thread Martin Kepplinger
quick update: I package it already, I'd only need a sponsor. The package is on mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/xf86-input-tslib I maintain the tslib package aswell. It gains popularity now: https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=libts0+libts-bin&show_installed=on&want_legend

Re: Help needed with gcc-7 error

2017-08-28 Thread Martin Eberhard Schauer
Well, casting to long helped - but in how far does making abs(unsigned - unsigned) no sense? This does not sound very logical to me. The result of (unsigned - unsigned) is unsigned. What about A, B both unsigned and B > A?

Bug#852233: Done: RFS: humanfriendly/2.4-1 [ITP]

2017-05-30 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Hi Gaurav, many thanks for packaging humanfriendly, a package which I need for newer versions of pymodbus! I updated to new upstream 3.2, add myself to uploaders and uploaded directly to unstable (no need to go through experimental, because humanfriendly is not affected by stretch release). Chee

Bug#861490: RFS: xf86-input-tslib/0.0.7-1

2017-04-29 Thread Martin Kepplinger
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: whishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xf86-input-tslib" * Package name: xf86-input-tslib Version : 0.0.7-1 Upstream Author : Martin Kepplinger * URL : https://github.com/merge/xf86-i

Re: xf86-input-tslib: new upstream release (and location)

2017-04-29 Thread Martin Kepplinger
Am 2017-04-28 um 14:58 schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Hi all, > > xf86-input-tslib is kind of dying in Debian, see > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xf86-input-tslib > > tslib itself that this driver uses, has quite some users still. Now > there is a new release, version 0.0.

xf86-input-tslib: new upstream release (and location)

2017-04-28 Thread Martin Kepplinger
martin encrypted.asc Description: Binary data

Bug#854693: update to tslib 1.7

2017-03-14 Thread Martin Kepplinger
Dear possible sponsors, Let's make Debian for embedded just a little better! :) I'd be happy to maintain the tslib Debian package for the future. thanks, martin

Bug#854693: update

2017-03-05 Thread Martin Kepplinger
he package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tslib/tslib_1.6-1.dsc Regards, Martin Kepplinger

Bug#854693: (kein Betreff)

2017-02-13 Thread Martin Kepplinger
eens need tslib. thanks martin

Bug#854693: RFS: tslib/1.5-1 [ITP]

2017-02-09 Thread Martin Kepplinger
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tslib" * Package name: tslib Version : 1.5-1 Upstream Author : [Martin Kepplinger ] * URL : [https://github.com/kergoth/tslib] * License :

Bug#826169: RFS: gpxsee/2.14 [ITP] -- GPX viewer and analyser

2016-06-14 Thread Martin Tůma
Ok, thanks for the info. However as OBS does not provide Debian source packages and doing it extra manually is beyond my scope, all I can do is to change the issue from RFS to RFP. M. __ > Od: Andrey Rahmatullin > Komu: Marti

Bug#826169: RFS: gpxsee/2.14 [ITP] -- GPX viewer and analyser

2016-06-02 Thread Martin Tůma
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for the Debian GPXSee package Package name: gpxsee Version : 2.14 Upstream Author : Martin Tůma URL : http://tumic.wz.cz/gpxsee License : GPL3 The project source code is host

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-05-12 Thread Martin A. Brown
Thank you for all of the suggestions! I'll open a different bug ticket once I figure out what's going on. (I think you wanted this one closed.) -Martin -- Martin A. Brown http://linux-ip.net/

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-05-12 Thread Martin A. Brown
>sponsorship of a -2 revision if you have a testsuite fix. I will do so. I appreciate all of your guidance, help and advice, Gianfranco. >thanks for your contribution to Debian! And, I'm very happy to see that I have crossed the minimum bar. -Martin -- Martin A. Brown http://linux-ip.net/

Bug#822722: tldp uploaded to mentors.debian.net (fwd)

2016-05-01 Thread Martin A. Brown
Ah-ha. So, the processing of uploaded files is time-delayed. OK. -Martin -- Forwarded message -- From: mentors.debian.net To: mar...@linux-ip.net Subject: tldp uploaded to mentors.debian.net Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 03:11:30 Hi. Your upload of the package 'tld

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-04-30 Thread Martin A. Brown
ime, you need also to run tests >against them :) OK, I can do that. Is that a requirement for submitting the package? I added the bits and bobs that are not provided with every system to allow testing of all documentation generation on any platform or distribution. Test coverage is at 92%

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-04-28 Thread Martin A. Brown
be able to provide another update for a day or two, but I'll let you know when I have something. Thank you again and have a good evening, -Martin -- Martin A. Brown http://linux-ip.net/

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-04-28 Thread Martin A. Brown
Hello again Gianfranco (and lots of cc:), >Hi Martin, lets pick up this package! Excellent! Thank you very much for the help. >First a general note: I'm truly impressed about your work and your learning >curve! Merci beaucoup! Danke! Grazie! >Don't be sad for my rev

Re: request more advice: lintian warnings and python-tldp + ldp-docbook-stylesheets

2016-04-27 Thread Martin A. Brown
however. Lastly, the newest tag (tldp-0.7.10) is available at the canonical location [4] with the subsequent changes to the ./debian/ directory to handle the packaging. What do I do next? -Martin [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822722 # RFS [1] https://bugs.debian.or

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-04-26 Thread Martin A. Brown
understanding how to interact smoothly with the Debian system. >you're lucky that somebody reads bugs filed against unknown >packages :) Yes, and your reply has been very helpful. >> * Package name: tldp >>Version : 0.7.8 >>Upstream Author :

Re: request more advice: lintian warnings and python-tldp + ldp-docbook-stylesheets

2016-04-22 Thread Martin A. Brown
stream releases. I have just read up on uscan. >For Debian specific packages this sounds... useless :) > >so, instead of calling your tool >1.0 > >you have to call it >"1.0-1" >and put 1.0 (quilt) in debian/source/format. If I change debian/source/format to anyt

request more advice: lintian warnings and python-tldp + ldp-docbook-stylesheets

2016-04-21 Thread Martin A. Brown
ly, I have not gotten the process too wrong. Best regards, -Martin [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822181 -- Martin A. Brown http://linux-ip.net/

ldp-docbook-stylesheets; where to find, how to update

2016-04-15 Thread Martin A. Brown
simply maintain it in the current location. Recommendations? * Assuming I can adjust the XSL and DSSSL according to my plan, and build a package, someplace... what do I do next? -Martin -- Martin A. Brown http://linux-ip.net/

Re: Collab-maint approval time?

2015-10-24 Thread Martin Steghöfer
r user with the same problem. I haven't been able to get a hold of an admin yet. Cheers, Martin

Bug#771774: RFS: libmongo-client/0.1.8-2 [ITA]

2015-07-08 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Jörg Frings-Fürst [2015-07-08 14:58]: > for the ftbfs bug I have upload a new version of > libmongo-client/0.1.8-2[1]. I sponsored this upload for the GCC 5 build failure but I won't be able to sponsor in the future, so you still need to find one. -- Martin Michlmayr Linux fo

Bug#782340: RFS: redeclipse/1.5.1-1 redeclipse-data/1.5.1-1

2015-04-18 Thread Martin Erik Werner
tags 782340 + fixed pending thanks redelipse-data is now in experimental. redeclipse is pending in NEW (due to the new redeclipse-common binary package). -- Martin Erik Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: CMake Error: Could not open file for write in copy operation ... System Error: Permission denied

2014-10-24 Thread Martin Steghöfer
. If he executes "make install" afterwards, then CMake copies the compiled/configured stuff to installation locations (as defined by the INSTALL commands in the CMakeLists.txt). And at that stage, you can safely assume that you have enough privileges to actually do that. I hope that helps!

Re: CMake Error: Could not open file for write in copy operation ... System Error: Permission denied

2014-10-23 Thread Martin Steghöfer
El 23/10/14 a les 18:01, Martin Steghöfer ha escrit: The line in question says: configure_file("${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/bin/qt.conf" "${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/qt.conf") where CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR is "/usr/bin". A little correction: It actually sai

Re: CMake Error: Could not open file for write in copy operation ... System Error: Permission denied

2014-10-23 Thread Martin Steghöfer
on commands: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Install_Commands Btw. I think your package is also missing a build dependency to "libqt4-opengl-dev". Cheers, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe&qu

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

2014-09-24 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 22. September 2014, 09:52:55 schrieb Eriberto Mota: > Hi Martin, Hello Eriberto, thanks for your continuing review. > 2014-09-22 7:19 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald : > > Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2014, 17:47:29 schrieb Eriberto: > >> Hi Martin, &g

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

2014-09-23 Thread Martin Steigerwald
an by that? I already have > > >> > > > >> > Files: debian/* > > >> > Copyright: 2013-2014 Martin Steigerwald > > >> > License: GPL-3+ > > >> > > > >> > Anything else needed? > > >> > > >>

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

2014-09-22 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2014, 17:47:29 schrieb Eriberto: > Hi Martin, Hello Eriberto, > About your package, please: > > 1. Use DH 9 instead DH 8. > > 2. d/control: > - Change Priority from 'extra' to 'optional'. > - The Homepage

Bug#749096: RFS: karlyriceditor/1.11-1 [ITP]

2014-09-20 Thread Martin Steghöfer
Hi Eriberto, Thank you for your time and attention! I've uploaded a new version to git and mentors that incorporates your suggested changes: * https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor * http://mentors.debian.net/package/karlyriceditor Eriberto Mota wrote: 1. Updat

Re: Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

2014-09-18 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 08:52:53 schrieb Eriberto Mota: > Hi Martin, Hi Eriberto, > 2014-09-17 19:01 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald : > > Changed to github already in a re-uploaded distkeys package (dput -f). > > Your package in mentors.d.n is old yet. Do you uploaded

Re: Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

2014-09-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2014, 17:47:29 schrieb Eriberto: > Hi Martin, Hi Eriberto, > About your package, please: > > 1. Use DH 9 instead DH 8. > > 2. d/control: > - Change Priority from 'extra' to 'optional'. > - The Homepage field and

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

2014-09-17 Thread Martin Steigerwald
tags 712787 -moreinfo thanks Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014, 09:07:04 schrieb Eriberto Mota: > tags 712787 moreinfo > thanks > > > Hi Martin, HI Eriberto, > > You didn't put the ITP number in d/changelog. Did so now. > To make easier the review, p

Bug#749096: Updated version

2014-09-03 Thread Martin Steghöfer
m somewhat complex in the link I've given, due to the representation as a git diff of a patch. But I understand that it may not even be necessary, as Ubuntu will have Libav10 at the time they pick up the package. Cheers, Martin El 03/09/14 a les 11:30, Thibaut Paumard ha escrit: Dear Marti

Bug#749096: Updated version

2014-09-03 Thread Martin Steghöfer
Thanks for the clarification, Vincent! Cheers, Martin El 03/09/14 a les 11:22, Vincent Cheng ha escrit: Hi Martin, No, there is no rule saying that a package cannot include anything that's unnecessary for sid and/or would benefit downstream distributions. There's nothing th

Bug#749096: Updated version

2014-09-03 Thread Martin Steghöfer
if I understand you correctly (taken the fact that the little change in the patch is already too much): Helping downstream distributions happens via other channels, the Debian package is not supposed/allowed to include anything that is unnecessary for Debian unstable. Thanks! Martin -- To UNSUBS

Bug#749096: Updated version

2014-08-29 Thread Martin Steghöfer
Still looking for a sponsor... Meanwhile I've made some minor improvements. The new version has been uploaded to mentors and VCS: http://mentors.debian.net/package/karlyriceditor https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor Btw. I was wondering, how much we care

Re: Help needed for wxWidgets 3.0 transition of TreeviewX

2014-08-10 Thread Martin Steghöfer
ety-net" kind of parameter (like in snprintf). The attached patch should fix it. I removed the dangerous fall-back definition (that does more harm than good) and replaced the constructor calls (in which the definition was used) by the appropriate constructor calls. Cheers, Martin El 07/08

Bug#749096: RFS: karlyriceditor/1.11-1 [ITP]

2014-05-23 Thread Martin Steghöfer
ernatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -xhttp://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/karlyriceditor/karlyriceditor_1.11-1.dsc Or download the source package from the git VCS and build it using git-buildpackage: gbp-clone https://github.com/martin-

Re: RFS:grub-customizer - A GUI for customizing the bootloader (GRUB2 or BURG)

2014-04-29 Thread Martin Eberhard Schauer
) * support for GRUB2 and BURG * reinstallation of the bootloader to MBR * settings like default operating system, kernel params, background image and text colors etc. * changing the installed operating system by running on a live cd Cheers, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

2014-04-22 Thread Martin Steigerwald
ITP finally went through after Don added some additional stripping to the mail parsing. ITP: distkeys -- Distkeys - upload SSH keys to servers and more http://bugs.debian.org/745478 Thanks, -- Martin Steigerwald Consultant / Trainer teamix GmbH Südwestpark 43 90449 Nürnberg fon: +49 911

Bug#712787: Current status of distkeys packaging

2014-04-14 Thread Martin Steigerwald
t line. I try to get that resolved and post bug number then. Source, including packaging source, is also hosted with Github: https://github.com/teamix/distkeys For now I try to keep both repositories in sync, but I think I will switch VCS to Github prior to any release to Debian. Ciao, Martin

Bug#736672: ITP: hh - BASH history suggest box

2014-04-09 Thread Martin Dvorak
Control: package 736672 wnpp On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Martin Dvorak wrote: > Control: severity 736672 wishlist > Control: source 736672 wnpp > > -- _____ *Martin Dvorak* http://www.mindforger.com

Bug#736672: ITP: hh - BASH history suggest box

2014-04-09 Thread Martin Dvorak
Control: severity 736672 wishlist Control: source 736672 wnpp

Bug#736672: ITP: hh - BASH history suggest box

2014-04-09 Thread Martin Dvorak
Control: retitle 736672 ITP: hh - BASH history suggest box

Bug#736672: ITP: hstr - BASH history suggest box

2014-04-09 Thread Martin Dvorak
Control: retitle 736672 ITP: hstr - BASH history suggest box

Bug#736672: ITP: HH/1.0.7-1 - suggest box like BASH history completion

2014-04-09 Thread Martin Dvorak
Control: retitle 736672 ITP: HH/1.0.7-1 - suggest box like BASH history completion

Bug#712787: RFS: distkeys/1.0 -- distribute SSH keys

2014-03-26 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hi Eriberto, Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014, 09:40:27 schrieb Eriberto: > Ping! Do you still have interest over this package? I already started migrating it to non-native package format on request, but then was quite busy. Why do you ask? Ciao, Martin -- Martin Steigerwald Consultant / Trai

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

2014-03-24 Thread Martin Pitt
-bag errors ;-). That too :-) But I mostly value them for avoiding the introduction of ABI changes or otherwise changed behaviour which break existing packages. E. g. if we upload a new pygobject which breaks our graphical installer (ubiquity), we'd hold pygobject instead of noticing the break

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

2014-03-20 Thread Martin Pitt
ed features, but it could perhaps look like Tests: foo Features: build-target=testonly Which would then expect a "testonly" debian/rules target. Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

2014-03-20 Thread Martin Pitt
. It kind of does by rejecting packages which don't build on all platforms, i. e. if tests during build fail on a particular arch. > Would it be worth running them as autopkgtest tests *as well* for > this use case? If you can, sure. Otherwise a quick smoke test

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

2014-03-19 Thread Martin Pitt
compromise? > > It does indeed, with Jakub's idea of copying only the required code to > $ADTTMP too. Done now: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b4ffe65ce Language/grammar/style corrections appreciated :) Martin -- Martin Pitt

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

2014-03-18 Thread Martin Pitt
I wouldn't want to drop build-needed, as it only complicates things for the cases where people want it. But I'm happy to add a stanza to its documentation to avoid it for packages which take a nontrivial amount of time to build; does that sound like an acceptable compromise?

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

2014-03-18 Thread Martin Pitt
ules build-tests" (or whichever target you have) in debian/tests/mytest. autopkgtest calls dpkg-buildpackage to do the actual package build, so for adding this to autopkgtest explicitly, we could add a flag for that and call dpkg-buildpackage --target. Martin -- Martin Pitt

Bug#731036: Changed the name

2014-02-22 Thread Martin Ueding
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/thinkpad-scripts/thinkpad-scripts_3.5.1-1.dsc Would you be willing to sponsor this package now? Regards, Martin -- http://martin-ueding.de/#pk_campaign=Email signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#736672: RFS: hh/1.0.2 [ITP]

2014-01-25 Thread Martin Dvorak
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hh" * Package name: hh Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : Martin Dvorak (Dvorka) * URL : https://github.com/dvorka/hstr * License

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-03 Thread Martin Ueding
> We'd need to ask a lawyer to get an useful answer to that question, I think. The problem is that I do not know a lawyer that I could just ask. And I am German, another dev is American, so I have no idea whether to ask a German or an American lawyer. We already have the name in the description.

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-03 Thread Martin Ueding
Okay, “thinklight” does not count, then. The question is, whether using “thinkpad-” would cause any trouble with trademarks? I think “thinkpad-utils” or “thinkpad-tools” or “thinkpad-scripts” is an improvement. Would those be okay with you? The problem is that it started as a single rotation scr

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-03 Thread Martin Ueding
I talked about this with another developer: https://github.com/martin-ueding/think-rotate/issues/26 It looks like there is no `thinkpad-` package in Ubuntu or Debian, but several with `think` in them. Does it really make sense to rename this to `thinkpad`, when there are other packages like

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-02 Thread Martin Ueding
`*-docking` as well. Let me file an upstream issue in the tracker and let me get back to this. -- http://martin-ueding.de/#pk_campaign=Email signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >