[patches]
- Remove all GNU/Hurd patches. Let Hurd porters handle that.
* [control]
= Breaks/Replaces: dhcpcd5 using (<< ${binary:Version}) variable.
* [rules]
+ Add --no-stop-on-upgrade --no-restart-after-upgrade (Closes: #1057959).
Regards,
- --
Martin-Éric Rac
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "upgrade-system":
* Package name : upgrade-system
Version : 1.9.2.0
Upstream contact : Martin-Éric Racine
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:05 AM Santiago Ruano Rincón
wrote:
>
> El 26/11/23 a las 10:53, Tobias Frost escribió:
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
> > As Daniel said, this should be done on a VM, or if the hardware is
> > important, on a porter box.
> >
> > See https://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-ac
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 9:30 PM Daniel Gröber wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 09:03:37PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:59 PM Daniel Gröber wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 06:55:44PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:59 PM Daniel Gröber wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 06:55:44PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > dhcpcd (1:10.0.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* Attempt to fix the GNU/Hurd build.
> > + 003_fix_FTBFS_on_Hurd.patch
>
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhcpcd":
* Package name : dhcpcd
Version : 1:10.0.5-4
Upstream contact : Roy Marples
* URL
BACKPORTS repository uploaded
this package for me.
Kind regards,
Martin-Éric Racine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120301015550.16918.46250.report...@eesti.lan
wnload the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-geode/xserver-xorg-video-geode_2.11.13-2~bpo60+1.dsc
I would be glad if someone with access to the BACKPORTS repository
uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Martin-É
gnupg my name in UTF-8. But how?
Here, I created my key in Latin-1. To make debsign use iit even though the
control file is in UTF-8, I enabled the following option in .gnupg/gpg.conf:
charset utf-8
I have no idea if this will work for a Latin-2 key, but it's worth trying.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.iki.fi/q-funk/
gnupg my name in UTF-8. But how?
Here, I created my key in Latin-1. To make debsign use iit even though the
control file is in UTF-8, I enabled the following option in .gnupg/gpg.conf:
charset utf-8
I have no idea if this will work for a Latin-2 key, but it's worth trying.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.iki.fi/q-funk/
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I thank everyone who contributed ideas for the script.
Some of those ideas have now been implemented. Add this to sources.list to test:
deb http://funkyware.konflux.at debian/
Now, unless anybody strongly objects, the package will
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I thank everyone who contributed ideas for the script.
Some of those ideas have now been implemented. Add this to sources.list to test:
deb http://funkyware.konflux.at debian/
Now, unless anybody strongly objects, the package will
would anybody object to my package being uploaded on its own or not.
So far, there's been suggestions to include it in apt-utils, debian-goodies or
deborphan - but nobody firmly opposed to the package being uploaded on its own.
Do I take that as a "go ahead with the upload"?
--
Mar
gt;
> But by the use of deborphan above I know you don't want to disable
> removing packages. But I do and it makes the process much safer. But
> this next one you might want, at least the --force-confold part. The
> replace missing config file one has raised a lot of debate in the
> past.
>
> DPkg::Options {"--force-confmiss";"--force-confold"};
Interesting ideas.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
would anybody object to my package being uploaded on its own or not.
So far, there's been suggestions to include it in apt-utils, debian-goodies or
deborphan - but nobody firmly opposed to the package being uploaded on its own.
Do I take that as a "go ahead with the upload"?
--
Mar
gt;
> But by the use of deborphan above I know you don't want to disable
> removing packages. But I do and it makes the process much safer. But
> this next one you might want, at least the --force-confold part. The
> replace missing config file one has raised a lot of debate in the
> past.
>
> DPkg::Options {"--force-confmiss";"--force-confold"};
Interesting ideas.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
cript updates automatically and you only have to toggle one option).
Proven to be somewhat dangerous, because several packages have severely broken
assumptions if you run apt-get on a fully quiet and automatic mode.
> Another likely package to merge with would be apt-utils. Its a utility
> for apt to improve it, like the preconfiguring of packages.
Including it in apt-utils almost makes sense to me.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
cript updates automatically and you only have to toggle one option).
Proven to be somewhat dangerous, because several packages have severely broken
assumptions if you run apt-get on a fully quiet and automatic mode.
> Another likely package to merge with would be apt-utils. Its a utility
> for apt to improve it, like the preconfiguring of packages.
Including it in apt-utils almost makes sense to me.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
so I think
that it has reached the stage where it is no longer a trivial demo, even though
the APT and deborphan tricks it does are simple. Anyhow, I would prefer keeping
it a separate package.
What do the mentors of the list think?
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
so I think
that it has reached the stage where it is no longer a trivial demo, even though
the APT and deborphan tricks it does are simple. Anyhow, I would prefer keeping
it a separate package.
What do the mentors of the list think?
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
use merkel is restricted because of the recent kernel exploits,
> and so the information push from spohr (where the information is
> collected) to merkel (where http://qa.debian.org/developer.php is)
> doesn't work any more. Sorry for this problem.
Wouldn't it be better to move d
use merkel is restricted because of the recent kernel exploits,
> and so the information push from spohr (where the information is
> collected) to merkel (where http://qa.debian.org/developer.php is)
> doesn't work any more. Sorry for this problem.
Wouldn't it be better to move d
t a DD, my
key definitely exists on a public server, as confirmed by Kenshi. What gives?
Anyhow, I'm pretty pleased with my participation in Debian so far. I just
thought I'd thank these people and notify the community of the above buglets.
Best Regards,
--
Martin-Éric Racine,
t a DD, my
key definitely exists on a public server, as confirmed by Kenshi. What gives?
Anyhow, I'm pretty pleased with my participation in Debian so far. I just
thought I'd thank these people and notify the community of the above buglets.
Best Regards,
--
Martin-Éric Racine,
ome/q-funk/Projects/cups-pdf-1.3.1>$
X8-
I'd thus need a script to recode /etc/passwd,/etc/shadow,/etc/groups to UTF-8.
However, I have no idea if e.g. adduser, NIS tools, etc. can cope with those
Unicode escape characters in those files. Can anyone shed any light on this?
--
Martin-
ome/q-funk/Projects/cups-pdf-1.3.1>$
X8-
I'd thus need a script to recode /etc/passwd,/etc/shadow,/etc/groups to UTF-8.
However, I have no idea if e.g. adduser, NIS tools, etc. can cope with those
Unicode escape characters in those files. Can anyone shed any light on this?
--
Martin-
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 09:05:04AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > Heck, if you ask me, Sarge should be known as the "we upgrade everyone
> > to UTF-8" Debian release. This would imply that absolutely every
> > packag
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 09:05:04AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > Heck, if you ask me, Sarge should be known as the "we upgrade everyone
> > to UTF-8" Debian release. This would imply that absolutely every
> > packag
s
> is what I'd suggest he should do - but this doesn't solve his other
> problems, of course)
Would recoding names in the GECOS data from /etc/passwd into UTF-8 solve it?
It currently reads (encoded in Latin-1):
q-funk:x:1000:1000:Martin-Éric Racine,,,:/home/q-funk:/bin/bash
If you
s
> is what I'd suggest he should do - but this doesn't solve his other
> problems, of course)
Would recoding names in the GECOS data from /etc/passwd into UTF-8 solve it?
It currently reads (encoded in Latin-1):
q-funk:x:1000:1000:Martin-Éric Racine,,,:/home/q-funk:/bin/bash
If you
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I got this Error message for the first time this morning.
> >
> > If I change my locale setting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1], debsign can no
> > longer
> > find
ssues, I would
gladly hear them. :-)
[1] Shouldn't this @euro crap be gone by now? I mean the Euro is the only
currency here since a few years already. Should fi_FI mean ISO-8859-15 by
default, at this point?
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I got this Error message for the first time this morning.
> >
> > If I change my locale setting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1], debsign can no longer
> > find my GPG k
ssues, I would
gladly hear them. :-)
[1] Shouldn't this @euro crap be gone by now? I mean the Euro is the only
currency here since a few years already. Should fi_FI mean ISO-8859-15 by
default, at this point?
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
een accepted by upstream as the Debian packager and have been
maintaining packages of cups-pdf at my own repository for a while. At this
point, the package seems mature enough to enter the Debian project, hence why I
am asking for a sponsor.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
een accepted by upstream as the Debian packager and have been
maintaining packages of cups-pdf at my own repository for a while. At this
point, the package seems mature enough to enter the Debian project, hence why I
am asking for a sponsor.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
38 matches
Mail list logo
