On Friday 02 July 2004 09:20, Stan Pinte wrote:
someone send me a mail, saying that these packages are already
maintained since 1.5 years...
(http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/kno
da/)
I'll have a look, and contact their maintainer first.
I wanted to sponsor
On Friday 02 July 2004 09:20, Stan Pinte wrote:
someone send me a mail, saying that these packages are already
maintained since 1.5 years...
(http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/kno
da/)
I'll have a look, and contact their maintainer first.
I wanted to sponsor
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:40, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
I tried to check some packages to find how do they solve this issue,
but now I'm really confused.
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:31, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, WHAT'SYOURNAME wrote:
I'm debianizing a package that I would like to split up, like:
package-backgrounds
package-icons
package-examples
Why? How big are the components? Would somebdy e.g
On Monday 05 April 2004 20:57, Erik Bourget wrote:
I'm wondering how to build multiple packages from a single source
Any specific problems?
Create two trees from debian/rules
(man dpkg-deb ! and related (man deb) !!).
You may want to do this using debhelper scripts (man debhelper, watch
out
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:31, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, WHAT'SYOURNAME wrote:
I'm debianizing a package that I would like to split up, like:
package-backgrounds
package-icons
package-examples
Why? How big are the components? Would somebdy e.g
On Monday 05 April 2004 20:57, Erik Bourget wrote:
I'm wondering how to build multiple packages from a single source
Any specific problems?
Create two trees from debian/rules
(man dpkg-deb ! and related (man deb) !!).
You may want to do this using debhelper scripts (man debhelper, watch
out
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:08, Frank Küster wrote:
In particular, I'm looking for something like
The contents of the orig.tar.gz should match contents of the
downloaded archive, as specified in copyright, as closely as
possible. If there are changes, they have to be documented in ...
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:08, Frank Küster wrote:
In particular, I'm looking for something like
The contents of the orig.tar.gz should match contents of the
downloaded archive, as specified in copyright, as closely as
possible. If there are changes, they have to be documented in ...
Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS game
that was called the mother of all
..
You've probably guessed that I'm looking for a sponser.
I hope you'll at least play the game to see if you like it.
I'm sorry i couldn't, the orig.tar is missing?
No binaries - try
On Saturday 21 February 2004 23:37, wrote:
Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS
game that was called the mother of all games. It is a multi-player,
turn-based, artilary stratagy game with many large weapons to blow of
your friends with. It's big fun. For more info
On Saturday 21 February 2004 16:06, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
I'm sorry to insist, but do you think that the workaround described
below is acceptable regarding debian policy ? By workaround, I mean
(shorrt version): as the libs needed by pgAdmin3 won't enter debian
for the moment (and may be never
On Saturday 21 February 2004 04:04, Nico Golde wrote:
* Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-21 01:46]:
Hello I search a sponsor for my packet binclock.
I read more documentation and know the package is lintian bug free.
You can find the files it under:
sorry, this is right:
Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS game
that was called the mother of all
..
You've probably guessed that I'm looking for a sponser.
I hope you'll at least play the game to see if you like it.
I'm sorry i couldn't, the orig.tar is missing?
No binaries - try
On Saturday 21 February 2004 23:37, wrote:
Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS
game that was called the mother of all games. It is a multi-player,
turn-based, artilary stratagy game with many large weapons to blow of
your friends with. It's big fun. For more info
On Saturday 21 February 2004 16:06, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
I'm sorry to insist, but do you think that the workaround described
below is acceptable regarding debian policy ? By workaround, I mean
(shorrt version): as the libs needed by pgAdmin3 won't enter debian
for the moment (and may be never
On Saturday 21 February 2004 04:04, Nico Golde wrote:
* Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-21 01:46]:
Hello I search a sponsor for my packet binclock.
I read more documentation and know the package is lintian bug free.
You can find the files it under:
sorry, this is right:
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:21, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
How can I install the missing dependecies? Or is there an other
Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 16:14, David Roundy wrote:
The usual way is using pre1, pre2, ..., rc1, ..., rel. As a
matter of fact, this sorts nicely.
Doesn't this have the problem that debian considers 1.2pre1 to be a
later version than 1.2?
As Andrew and others wrote: no if you do it like:
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 14:18, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
So the question is, is it permissable to put such a basic test of a
library into the rules file that gets executed as part of the build
process? If so, are there any guidelines anywhere as to how one
The test would involve compiling
Say, i have a need of a certain pkg, depended on by others that i want
to be in the pool quickly, so that i can continue with those depending.
Is it a good idea in general to try to build and upload from debian
machines for some archs?
thank you for your reply, martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Say, i have a need of a certain pkg, depended on by others that i want
to be in the pool quickly, so that i can continue with those depending.
Is it a good idea in general to try to build and upload from debian
machines for some archs?
thank you for your reply, martin
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 19:52, Mike Schacht wrote:
Here we go again... Looking for a sponser for knoda.
I had a look on that package, but as i don't know about current kde3
practices, i'd rather not step forward to upload.
knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on hk_classes
On Friday 31 August 2001 13:18, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
If this abuse continues, I might just
On Friday 31 August 2001 13:18, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
If this abuse continues, I might just
(Crossposted d-devel intentionally. Replies to d-mentors only, please).
GGI project released GGI 2.0. Debian is going woody. I would like to
have a clean GGI in woody, but trouble with bugs and policy.
Libgii and libggi, the DYNAMIC duo, lived, more or less happily, for a
long time without
I've send to the wrong adress, here it is to the list again:
Thanks Matt Zimmermann for your kind and reassuring answers.
For a summary see his answers. I couldn't express better.
I'm planning to use debconf as soon as it has settled somewhat.
Open are the questions:
- How to find out that
I've send to the wrong adress, here it is to the list again:
Thanks Matt Zimmermann for your kind and reassuring answers.
For a summary see his answers. I couldn't express better.
I'm planning to use debconf as soon as it has settled somewhat.
Open are the questions:
- How to find out that
Hello, dear developers!
libggi-target-fbdev.postinst checks /dev for framebuffer entries. If
none are found, it offers to create them. Now i've received the
following:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libggi-target-fbdev
Version: 1:1.99.2.0b3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
When I upgraded the
Uhm, sorry - that question was silly. I haven't made up my mind wide
enough, it seems.
All that is left on this issue: Is it ok for postinst to output a
message of minor priority without pause/prompting for a key?
sorry, thanks, greetings martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, dear developers!
libggi-target-fbdev.postinst checks /dev for framebuffer entries. If
none are found, it offers to create them. Now i've received the
following:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libggi-target-fbdev
Version: 1:1.99.2.0b3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
When I upgraded the
Uhm, sorry - that question was silly. I haven't made up my mind wide
enough, it seems.
All that is left on this issue: Is it ok for postinst to output a
message of minor priority without pause/prompting for a key?
sorry, thanks, greetings martin
On Friday 16 February 2001 00:15, Martin Albert wrote:
Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
And that was looong ago. Sorry, that i didn't say thanks to
Matt Zimmerman, Ingo Saitz, Brian Russo, Hamish Moffatt
earlier for your kind
On Saturday 24 February 2001 14:22, Sam TH wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another thing: your Build-depends seems wrong.
Policy says: 'A source package may declare a dependency or a
conflict on a binary package', but your are depending on a
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, the configure file should also check for ghttp.h, it didnt
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:21:13PM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
This produces unnecessary hassles when, for instance, cross
compiling.
On Saturday 24
On Friday 16 February 2001 00:15, Martin Albert wrote:
Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
And that was looong ago. Sorry, that i didn't say thanks to
Matt Zimmerman, Ingo Saitz, Brian Russo, Hamish Moffatt
earlier for your kind
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:30:49AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
you also fail to install a menu file. I am coming up with a
lintian check for packages linked to X and not installing one. So
you reminded me of another bug (-:
No, i'm sure you wouldn't do that. :) libggi-target-x
On Saturday 24 February 2001 14:22, Sam TH wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another thing: your Build-depends seems wrong.
Policy says: 'A source package may declare a dependency or a
conflict on a binary package', but your are depending on a
Hello, ya all!
I chose the above mentioned pkgs from the beginning, prepared a NMU of
the old packages, but now have new upstream packages ready.
My first try to contact the corresponding debian maintainer was mid Jan
2001. Feb 2nd i received:
Are you alive?
Yes. Alive, but busy. I just
On Saturday 24 February 2001 17:48, Eric VB wrote:
Now if I add a line to debian/postrm.debhelper, everytime I re-build
my package (dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot), this line is erased. Where
do I have to declare my cutomized commands ?
man dh_installdeb doesn't help and is a bit confused :
Hm,
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, the configure file should also check for ghttp.h, it didnt
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:21:13PM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
This produces unnecessary hassles when, for instance, cross
compiling.
On Saturday 24
Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
Two small (10k) demos, where at least one is practically usable, this
is, would be nice to have it installed as binary, are to be installed
with the binary pkg.
The previous debian release
Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
Two small (10k) demos, where at least one is practically usable, this
is, would be nice to have it installed as binary, are to be installed
with the binary pkg.
The previous debian release has
Hello!
I'm looking for info/doc/scripts/hints on proper / practical ways to
submit patches.
Of interest to me is also the proper way to generate a patch to a
single file - what is the best point in the dir structure to start?
Toplevel, ../Toplevel, ... ?
But currently i do have fixes for
Hello!
I'm looking for info/doc/scripts/hints on proper / practical ways to
submit patches.
Of interest to me is also the proper way to generate a patch to a
single file - what is the best point in the dir structure to start?
Toplevel, ../Toplevel, ... ?
But currently i do have fixes for around
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 31-Jan-2001 Martin Albert wrote:
proper / practical ways to submit patches?
what i do is:
..
mv package package.shaleh
dpkg-source -x package.dsc
# the N makes it include files I might have added
diff -pruN package package.shaleh
I have picked up a new upstream source and packaged cthugha, which was
orphaned.
If somebody could sponsor the upload for me, I'd appreciate.
Deb-src line is:
deb-src
http://home.t-online.de/home/eislink/debian woody non-free
Download and info also on http://cthugha.debox.de
tnx and
I have picked up a new upstream source and packaged cthugha, which was
orphaned.
If somebody could sponsor the upload for me, I'd appreciate.
Deb-src line is:
deb-src
http://home.t-online.de/home/eislink/debian woody non-free
Download and info also on http://cthugha.debox.de
tnx and
48 matches
Mail list logo
