Bug#930633: i3-gaps RFS/ITP

2019-06-18 Thread Michael Stapelberg
> Certainly, a merge is the superior solution and i am glad its actually being considered, but my understanding is that code refactoring/cleaning could take a considerable amount of time, and therefore the package should actually be available as a temporary solution for all those who want to use it

Bug#930633: i3-gaps RFS/ITP

2019-06-17 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hey, thanks everyone for reaching out. The interest in making i3-gaps available to more people has prompted some discussion between Ingo (the maintainer of the i3-gaps fork, and an i3 core maintainer) and me. The key concern about the i3-gaps fork is code quality: the implementation cannot easil

Bug#862755: RFS: golang-github-go-ini-ini/1.27.0-1

2017-07-23 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Félix, Thanks for your work on the package. Félix Sipma writes: > Here are the remaining issues (logs attached): > > 2017/07/10 21:02:40 FAILED: grafana_2.6.0+dfsg-3 (see > buildlogs/grafana_2.6.0+dfsg-3) > 2017/07/10 21:02:40 FAILED: nomad_0.4.0+dfsg-1 (see > buildlogs/nomad_0.4.0+dfsg-1)

Bug#848148: RFS: restic/0.3.1-1

2016-12-18 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Félix, Thanks for working on this package! If you’re willing to move this package to pkg-go, I’m willing to sponsor it :). Please see https://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/ Félix Sipma writes: > Download with dget: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/restic/restic_0.3

Bug#803895: [pkg-go] Bug#803895: RFS: gox/0.3.0-1 [ITP, pkg-go] -- cross-compilation for Go

2015-11-05 Thread Michael Stapelberg
; > On 03.11.2015 09:29, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > >> I’ve noticed the resulting package ships /usr/share/gocode/src/… — is > that > >> intentional? Does it make sense to ship the library code, i.e. will > other > >> programs use gox as a library? On first glance, it lo

Bug#803895: [pkg-go] Bug#803895: RFS: gox/0.3.0-1 [ITP, pkg-go] -- cross-compilation for Go

2015-11-03 Thread Michael Stapelberg
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Stender wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: block 796309 by -1 > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hi, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for my p

Re: Packaging a Go binary

2015-06-01 Thread Michael Stapelberg
For the record: I’ll be replying on the thread to pkg-go-maintainers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-go-maintainers/Week-of-Mon-20150601/000276.html On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Aaron Jacobs wrote: > [+Michael Stapelberg] > > I found this, apparently written b

Bug#694459: Bug#699915: tpu: lcdf-typetools/2.92+dfsg1-1.1

2013-02-10 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi, I have uploaded lcdf-typetools 2.92+dfsg1-0.1 to DELAYED/2, so that we have some time to cancel it depending on the reply to #699915 :). -- Best regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..

Bug#694459: Ping about #694352 and the proposed sponsored package in #694459

2013-02-06 Thread Michael Stapelberg
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 19:38:46 +0100 Christian PERRIER wrote: > Is there any chance that you work on another proposed upload? Since there hasn’t been a reply for one month, I am taking this. I have prepared an upload to t-p-u and will ask the release team for approval. I will close the bugreports on

RFS: mxallowd

2008-06-02 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mxallowd". * Package name: mxallowd Version : 1.5 Upstream Author : Michael Stapelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://michael.stapelberg.de/mxallowd * License : GPLv2 Section