Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-29 Thread Mike Schacht
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 08:39:08AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Using "./configure -options ... || cat config.log" in debian/rules was > suggested recently and could help a lot. That's brilliant! And if configure works it doesn't even fill the build logs with trash. Lovely. Done. > BTW what

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-28 Thread Mike Schacht
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 08:39:08AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Using "./configure -options ... || cat config.log" in debian/rules was > suggested recently and could help a lot. That's brilliant! And if configure works it doesn't even fill the build logs with trash. Lovely. Done. > BTW what

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:48PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information? > I know this doesn't answer your question, but I assume the portability > issues you mention are all build problems in one of Debian's supported > architectures, am I r

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Another option is to use the compile farm at SourceForge. This is a bit > more tricky, as you would have to be registered as a participant of one of > project hosted there, but that is not a big problem. Ah, now I wonder about

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > This list of debian machines: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, shows > > that some of the machines allow access by "all". There is no further > > explanation of who qualifies as "all", or how someone who is "all" can > > get access

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:48PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information? > I know this doesn't answer your question, but I assume the portability > issues you mention are all build problems in one of Debian's supported > architectures, am I r

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Another option is to use the compile farm at SourceForge. This is a bit > more tricky, as you would have to be registered as a participant of one of > project hosted there, but that is not a big problem. Ah, now I wonder about

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > This list of debian machines: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, shows > > that some of the machines allow access by "all". There is no further > > explanation of who qualifies as "all", or how someone who is "all" can > > get access

Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
vailable. Can anyone tell me if I might qualify for access to these machines for debugging packaging portability problem purposes, and if how, how to get it. Thanks, Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: knoda - a database frontend for KDE based on the hk_classes library.

2002-12-10 Thread Mike Schacht
ibhk-classes-dev availble so that knoda can be rebuilt and forget about the runtime shared lib packages as they are not required to run the app? Advice appreciated. Thanks, Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: knoda - a database frontend for KDE based on the hk_classes library.

2002-12-10 Thread Mike Schacht
ibhk-classes-dev availble so that knoda can be rebuilt and forget about the runtime shared lib packages as they are not required to run the app? Advice appreciated. Thanks, Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Request for Sponsor: kdirstat - Graphical disk usage display

2002-11-13 Thread Mike Schacht
ld be a fairly easy package to check. It compiled right out of the box and its operation is straight-forward. The upstream code required only one small modification in a makefile to fix some little policy offense. Thanks, Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Request for Sponsor: kdirstat - Graphical disk usage display

2002-11-13 Thread Mike Schacht
ld be a fairly easy package to check. It compiled right out of the box and its operation is straight-forward. The upstream code required only one small modification in a makefile to fix some little policy offense. Thanks, Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Looking for information about finding sponsors.

2002-09-23 Thread Mike Schacht
ick an easy package and come back through in a bit to post a request for sponsor. Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Looking for information about finding sponsors.

2002-09-23 Thread Mike Schacht
ick an easy package and come back through in a bit to post a request for sponsor. Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Looking for information about finding sponsors.

2002-09-20 Thread Mike Schacht
rs? What it the point of that? Should I consider doing that while waiting to be approved as an official developer? Thanks, Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Looking for information about finding sponsors.

2002-09-20 Thread Mike Schacht
up my things and go stand in line? Thanks for any leads, Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Looking for information about finding sponsors.

2002-09-20 Thread Mike Schacht
rs? What it the point of that? Should I consider doing that while waiting to be approved as an official developer? Thanks, Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Looking for information about finding sponsors.

2002-09-20 Thread Mike Schacht
up my things and go stand in line? Thanks for any leads, Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]