Hi Kilian,
Kilian Krause writes:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 12:26:32PM +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>>
>> I've seen build problems on
>> <https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=taxbird&suite=sid>
>>
>> The build problem could be fixed by a
Michael Tautschnig writes:
> [...]
>>
>> I added NMU-diffs for the debian changes only, because I think adding
>> the upstream diffs from libgeier 0.11 to 0.12 and taxbird from 0.15 to
>> 0.16 don't add any value.
>>
> [...]
>
> I suppose that's fine. I've now done the following:
>
> - Built li
Hi Michael,
Michael Tautschnig writes:
> - Built libgeier and uploaded to DELAYED/5.
> - Fixed the build-dep of taxbird to use glade instead of glade-gnome as there
> is
> some semi-broken transition going on. Noted the change in the changelog.
> - Built and uploaded taxbird to DELAYED/7.
>
>
Hi Michael,
next try ...
Michael Tautschnig writes:
> Sorry for the late reply (and it seems that all other people are busy as well
> :-/).
No problem, I don't walk away :-)
>> I added two messages to the bug report #619734, including the diffs for
>> the packages.
>>
>> I also uploaded new
Hi Michael,
Michael Tautschnig writes:
>> Michael Tautschnig writes:
>>
>> > Could you please briefly explain why you are NMUing this package? Are you
>> > intending to take over package maintainership? What about the previous
>> > maintainer?
>>
>> No, I don't want to take over the package.
Andreas Moog writes:
> On 07/11/2011 10:03 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>> Andreas Moog writes:
>>
>>> On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
>>>>> de
Andreas Moog writes:
> On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>
>>> I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
>>> dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
>>> http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/curr
Uwe Kleine-König writes:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>>
>> > P: libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog
>> > P: libgeier0: no-upstream-changelog
>>
>> Doesn't make sense, since upstream changelog is empty.
> So
Paul Wise writes:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>
>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> Not really:
>
> I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
> W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
> W:
Michael Tautschnig writes:
> Could you please briefly explain why you are NMUing this package? Are you
> intending to take over package maintainership? What about the previous
> maintainer?
No, I don't want to take over the package. The maintainer is still
maintaining libgeier and taxbird.
But
Paul Wise writes:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>
>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> Not really:
>
> I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
> W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
> W:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12-0.1
of my package "libgeier".
It builds these binary packages:
libgeier-dev - Development files for the libgeier library
libgeier0 - Elster client library (German tax declarations)
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The pa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.16-0.1
of the package "taxbird".
It builds these binary packages:
taxbird- The first free Elster client (German Tax Declarations)
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: ht
13 matches
Mail list logo
