On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:49:27PM +, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
> A package I maintain, cfengine2, contains three daemons, any or all
> of which are useful for some people. It also has cfagent, the program
> that actually does the configuration stuff it's asked to do.
>
> At present, none of
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:49:27PM +, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
> A package I maintain, cfengine2, contains three daemons, any or all
> of which are useful for some people. It also has cfagent, the program
> that actually does the configuration stuff it's asked to do.
>
> At present, none of
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:35:09AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:15:06PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > That said, the PTS seems to have frozen on november 2/3 or something
> > >
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:35:09AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:15:06PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > That said, the PTS seems to have frozen on november 2/3 or something
> > >
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> >
> > Hi Oliver,
> > I got same the problem with my pkg. the autobuilder have tried
> > again after a few days failing with even a worst error. I have tried
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> >
> > Hi Oliver,
> > I got same the problem with my pkg. the autobuilder have tried
> > again after a few days failing with even a worst error. I have tried
Hello!
See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=masqmail&ver=0.2.14-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1035866030&file=log&as=raw
...
Need to get 0B/348kB of archives. After unpacking 1413kB will be used.
dpkg: parse error, in file
`/home/buildd/build/chroot-unstable/var/lib/dpkg/available' near line
91378
Hello!
See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=masqmail&ver=0.2.14-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1035866030&file=log&as=raw
...
Need to get 0B/348kB of archives. After unpacking 1413kB will be used.
dpkg: parse error, in file
`/home/buildd/build/chroot-unstable/var/lib/dpkg/available' near line
91378
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 05:13:54PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 16:41:01 +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
>
> > #!/bin/sh -e
> >
> > ##$DEBIAN_SCRIPT_DEBUG || set -v -x
> >
> > if [ "$1" = "upgrade" ] ; then
&
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:08:01AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to move some conffiles from one directory to another in a package
> upgrade. Can I simply move it in the preinst? I suppose I will possibly
> have to create the target directory too unless I pre-depend on the
> pac
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 05:13:54PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 16:41:01 +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
>
> > #!/bin/sh -e
> >
> > ##$DEBIAN_SCRIPT_DEBUG || set -v -x
> >
> > if [ "$1" = "upgrade" ] ; then
&
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:08:01AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to move some conffiles from one directory to another in a package
> upgrade. Can I simply move it in the preinst? I suppose I will possibly
> have to create the target directory too unless I pre-depend on the
> pac
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:23:13AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
(lots of complicated things)
I think, if the Makefile is not too weird, it would be a lot easier
to make it install to $(DESTDIR), and configure the directories
in the 'normal' way.
> $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/packageName
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:23:13AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
(lots of complicated things)
I think, if the Makefile is not too weird, it would be a lot easier
to make it install to $(DESTDIR), and configure the directories
in the 'normal' way.
> $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/packageName
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:47:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.07.1326 +0200]:
> > Please see the discussion at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=162763
> >
> > I like it because it is sm
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:47:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.07.1326 +0200]:
> > Please see the discussion at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=162763
> >
> > I like it because it is
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 12:15:19PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.07.1124 +0200]:
> > Description: A configuration daemon for ethernet devices
> > ifplugd is a daemon which will automatically configure your
> > e
Hello!
I need a sponsor for ifplugd:
Description: A configuration daemon for ethernet devices
ifplugd is a daemon which will automatically configure your
ethernet device when a cable is plugged in and automatically
unconfigure it if the cable is pulled. This is useful on laptops with
onboard
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 12:15:19PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.07.1124 +0200]:
> > Description: A configuration daemon for ethernet devices
> > ifplugd is a daemon which will automatically configure your
> > e
Hello!
I need a sponsor for ifplugd:
Description: A configuration daemon for ethernet devices
ifplugd is a daemon which will automatically configure your
ethernet device when a cable is plugged in and automatically
unconfigure it if the cable is pulled. This is useful on laptops with
onboard
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 04:01:16AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Oliver Kurth
>
> | But he seems to be MIA. I reported the bug 16 days ago, told him about my
> | package 9 days ago. I never got a response. The bug itself is even older.
>
> MIA is a lot longer than 9 or 16
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 04:01:16AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Oliver Kurth
>
> | But he seems to be MIA. I reported the bug 16 days ago, told him about my
> | package 9 days ago. I never got a response. The bug itself is even older.
>
> MIA is a lot longer than 9 or
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:53:34PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, the question is:
> > Is it okay to do an NMU with a new upstream version?
> >
> > Depending on the answer
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:53:34PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, the question is:
> > Is it okay to do an NMU with a new upstream version?
> >
> > Depending on the answer
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:42:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:47:59PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in
> > question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version,
> &
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 20:47 +0200 9/17/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> >Hello!
>
> Hi,
>
> >
> >I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in
> >question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:42:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:47:59PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in
> > question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version,
&g
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 20:47 +0200 9/17/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> >Hello!
>
> Hi,
>
> >
> >I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in
> >question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is
,
Oliver
--
Oliver Kurth
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://leinekanal.de
pgp8ONLVzZv2v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Greetings,
Oliver
--
Oliver Kurth
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://leinekanal.de
msg07168/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:45:26AM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
>
> hi
>
> for your info: there is also a 'memtest86' package
>
> that is instead a kernel-like program
Yes, I know. This one is different, you do not have to boot the box with
it. You can use it in a running system.
This was _
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:45:26AM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
>
> hi
>
> for your info: there is also a 'memtest86' package
>
> that is instead a kernel-like program
Yes, I know. This one is different, you do not have to boot the box with
it. You can use it in a running system.
This was
Hello!
I need a sponsor for tcpreen:
Package: tcpreen
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: net
Installed-Size: 128
Maintainer: Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 1.0.2-1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
Description: Simple TCP re-engineering tool
TCPreen is a s
Hello!
I need a sponsor for tcpreen:
Package: tcpreen
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: net
Installed-Size: 128
Maintainer: Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 1.0.2-1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
Description: Simple TCP re-engineering tool
TCPreen is a s
Hello!
I need sponsor(s) for my packages:
memtester: A utility for testing the memory subsystem
This is a new package. memtest is already in sysutils, but I agreed with
the maintatiner of sysutils, that my package will conflict with all versions
of sysutils up to the current (<= 1.3.8.5.1), and h
Hello!
I need sponsor(s) for my packages:
memtester: A utility for testing the memory subsystem
This is a new package. memtest is already in sysutils, but I agreed with
the maintatiner of sysutils, that my package will conflict with all versions
of sysutils up to the current (<= 1.3.8.5.1), and
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 1:05 +0200 6/25/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
>
> >In principle they have moved to another location,
> >/etc/network/if-{up,down}.d,
> >and at the same I have greatly changed them. What happens if they are not
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 1:05 +0200 6/25/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
>
> >In principle they have moved to another location, /etc/network/if-{up,down}.d,
> >and at the same I have greatly changed them. What happens if they are not
> >
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 09:53:24AM -0500, Lonnie Sauter wrote:
> Oliver-
>
> I will continue with the parts of sysutils you do not want to deal
> with. Lets not orphan them, okay? Also, I think at one time procinfo
> became its own package.
Packages get orphaned when nobody is interested in the
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 09:53:24AM -0500, Lonnie Sauter wrote:
> Oliver-
>
> I will continue with the parts of sysutils you do not want to deal
> with. Lets not orphan them, okay? Also, I think at one time procinfo
> became its own package.
Packages get orphaned when nobody is interested in th
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:24:33AM -0500, Lonnie Sauter wrote:
> Oliver-
>
> I have no problems with you updating the sysutils package if you wish.
> If you would like to have the package we could arrange it. I have been
> looking to find something different to work on in any case.
Okay, I th
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:24:33AM -0500, Lonnie Sauter wrote:
> Oliver-
>
> I have no problems with you updating the sysutils package if you wish.
> If you would like to have the package we could arrange it. I have been
> looking to find something different to work on in any case.
Okay, I t
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 06:59:23PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> is no excuse for packaging this seperately IMNSHO.
>
> Furthermore, libncurses5 is Priority: required, so I don't really buy
> your argument about cutting down dependencies either.
>
> Why don't you contact the sysutils maintainer
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 06:06:58PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Aug 2002, Oliver Kurth wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:00:21AM -0400, Adam Lazur wrote:
> > > Oliver Kurth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > > I have packaged memtester 2.93.
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:00:21AM -0400, Adam Lazur wrote:
> Oliver Kurth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > I have packaged memtester 2.93.1.
>
> memtest 2.93.1 is already available in Debian as a part of the sysutils
> package.
I know. See my ITP, I already discussed this
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 02:15:56PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have packaged memtester 2.93.1. It is available with the following sources
> lines:
>
> deb http://masqmail.cx/debian
> deb-src http://masqmail.cx/debian
Sorry, I meant:
deb http://masqmail.cx/
Hello!
I have packaged memtester 2.93.1. It is available with the following sources
lines:
deb http://masqmail.cx/debian
deb-src http://masqmail.cx/debian
I start with version -2, because I have -1 already there for a while, and
I made a few minor changes.
I already filed an ITP for it (#155035
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:42:57PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to know how to have debconf templates displayed only if one,
> say upgrades his package "foo" from a version <= "baz".
>
> Any hints?
Use
dpkg --compare-versions
Example from masqmail.config:
if [ "$1" == "con
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:42:57PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to know how to have debconf templates displayed only if one,
> say upgrades his package "foo" from a version <= "baz".
>
> Any hints?
Use
dpkg --compare-versions
Example from masqmail.config:
if [ "$1" == "co
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:07:20AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 08:31, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 11:58:39PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > > I just uploaded a new version of libwww 5.4.0 to fix #151894 and the
> > > build failed on sparc and ia64 w
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:07:20AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 08:31, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 11:58:39PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > > I just uploaded a new version of libwww 5.4.0 to fix #151894 and the
> > > build failed on sparc and ia64
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:42:25PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 24-Jun-2002 Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have changed a package and made some files in /etc/pcmcia/ip-{up,down}.d/
> > obsolete. Since they are in /etc they are conff
(probably not)
2) ask via debconf if they should be deleted
3) move them out of the way, if so, where?
4) do nothing (bad idea, here for completeness)
5) [insert a better answer here]
I did not find an answer in the policy, I hope I searched hard enough...
Greetings,
Oliver
--
Oliver Kurth
mailto
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:42:25PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 24-Jun-2002 Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have changed a package and made some files in /etc/pcmcia/ip-{up,down}.d/
> > obsolete. Since they are in /etc they are conff
(probably not)
2) ask via debconf if they should be deleted
3) move them out of the way, if so, where?
4) do nothing (bad idea, here for completeness)
5) [insert a better answer here]
I did not find an answer in the policy, I hope I searched hard enough...
Greetings,
Oliver
--
Oliver Kurth
mailto
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:10:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:16:33PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler
> > prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors:
> >
Hello!
I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler
prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/cpuburn-1.4$ lintian ../cpuburn_1.4-1_i386.deb
E: cpuburn: statically-linked-binary ./usr/sbin/burnBX
E: cpuburn: statically-linked-
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:10:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:16:33PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler
> > prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors:
> >
&
Hello!
I want to package cpuburn, this is a small collection of assembler
prgrams to test CPUs (x86 only). lintian gives me these errors:
oku@robin:~/debian/cpuburn-1.4$ lintian ../cpuburn_1.4-1_i386.deb
E: cpuburn: statically-linked-binary ./usr/sbin/burnBX
E: cpuburn: statically-linked-binary
59 matches
Mail list logo
