Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-11 Thread Oliver Reiche
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "justbuild": * Package name : justbuild Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream contact : Oliver Reiche * URL : https://github.com/just-buildsystem/justbuild

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-11 Thread Oliver Reiche
Dear Hilmer, If you look at that page you see a few points, which needs to be > addressed. Please fix at least the lintian errors and warnings. > > The initial upload should not go to testing, either use unstable or > experimental. > I updated the package to fix the lintian issues and moved it to

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-15 Thread Oliver Reiche
schrieb am Do., 11. Mai 2023, 15:28: > On 5/11/23 15:11, Oliver Reiche wrote: > > Hi, > > > The source builds the following binary packages: > > > >justbuild - Justbuild generic build system > > > > To access further information about this

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-15 Thread Oliver Reiche
> > > I know that is is possible to create source packages consisting out of > more than 1 .orig.tar.gz. Maybe it is a better idea to split that > additional source into a new tar.gz. > > I'm not a DD, hence I can't sponsor your package anyway. Sorry! I see. That's already very helpful informatio

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-16 Thread Oliver Reiche
Hi Paul, On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 5:07 AM Paul Wise wrote: > Generally all build dependencies should be packaged separately instead. > > https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCopies > > Many thanks for that hint. I'm basically aware of the build dependencies policy and all of my binary and header-only

Re: Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-16 Thread Oliver Reiche
Hi Wookey On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:19 PM Wookey wrote: > I used 0~0-1 to start with. 0~ is a quite a good way of > versioning things like this that don't have versions. (that 0~ lets > you switch neatly to real versions in the future should they > appear). Adding git hashes mostly makes for unre

Questions about packaging the 'googleapis' project

2023-06-13 Thread Oliver Reiche
Dear mentors, Wookey and I are trying to come up with a sane concept to package the googleapis project [1]. During our initial investigation a few questions came up that we would like to discuss publicly. BACKGROUND: 'googleapis' is a collection of protocol buffer [2] files, an interface descri

Re: Questions about packaging the 'googleapis' project

2023-06-14 Thread Oliver Reiche
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 11:27 AM David Given wrote: > > The sad thing is that bazel, which is the least bad build system I've ever > used, works in a way that's completely antithetical to how Debian wants to > build things: it doesn't want to use host software for anything and will, > e.g., dow