HI,
Actually problem is not tools but documentation of recommended
procedure. We need public encouragement to use current sbuild tool
chain. (I didn't know it has evolved so much in last ? years.)
(Yes, I bare some responsibility...)
On Sat, 2021-04-17 at 23:45 +, nerdymutualist wrote:
> H
Hi mentors,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:30:38AM +0630, Ko Ko Ye` wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
I and Boyuan Yang gave some feedback to Ko Ko Ye` on Debian Input Method
Team .
Although his work seems to serve interesting spectrum of ethnic groups
which may be served less, the package qual
Hi,
> * Package name: fcitx-sunpinyin
>Version : 0.4.2-2
Thanks ... uploaded.
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 07:03:43PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
Uploaded ;-)
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:58:16PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > - What is better? Ubuntu and Debian - scripts in all packages or
> > apport scripts only into ubuntu and bug scripts in Debian?
>
> If you can and feel they benefit, why not both bug script and apport.
>
>
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 04:07:34PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I've some questions about bug-scripts for reportbug.
>
> - Is there a collection of the existing snippets?
Check your system under /usr/share/bug/ as documented.
See /usr/share/doc/reportbug/README.developers.gz
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:42:45PM +, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> Andrey Rahmatullin:
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:24:18PM +, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> >> Sure, the effort required for that is minimal. (I managed to create a
> >> non-Debian specific Makefile for "make install" that uses r
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 06:56:33PM +, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> >> I am upstream as well as would like to become a debian maintainer some
> >> day. Still learning packaging.
So what you need is a simple solution.
> >> Due to the luxury of being upstream as well, the upstream source pac
Hi,
If the package "foo" depends on the package "libbar-dev" and
"libbar-dev" is in new queue waiting for approval, can I upload the
package "foo" build on the sid chroot with the package "libbar-dev"
manually installed to it?
Or I should wait the package "libbar-dev" to be moved to sid?
Regards
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:01:18PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> The most useful thing you could do is help out with the plan for
> automatic debug packages for every binary package with debug symbols.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages
I see. It is interesting. (but not for me)
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 08:47:41PM +0100, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> Bartosz Feński writes:
> >> I am packaging some older software (eso-midas, [1]) that installs
> >> everything into a common directory (f.e. /usr/lib/eso-midas/). However,
> >> the FHS requires that this should be split between /usr/s
Hi,
Let's suppose the libfoo-1.0.tar.gz upstream to produce:
libfoo1 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/{libfoo.so.1.0.0,libfoo.so.1})
libfoo-dev (symlink and pkg-config file)
libfoo-utils (/usr/bin/foo)
Then I want to provide the debug package, too.
Whitch is the best practice: #1 or #2?
#1:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:35:38PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:17:12PM +0200, Innocent De Marchi wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gentoo".
> >
> > * Package name: gentoo
> >Version : 0.19.11-1
> >Upstream Author : Emil Brink
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:42:54 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote:
...
> I thought I could use a virtual machine, like, say, kvm, but there's a
> problem, it seems.
>
> If I understand correctly, with kvm, the guest syst
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:07:21PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hello,
> I am not sure which list I should direct this question to: it's a
> problem I am facing because I need to try and reproduce some bugs
> inside a throw-away test environment (without risking to crash my real
> boxes).
>
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:35:14AM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> Le mardi 21 décembre 2010 à 11:25 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > > I would like to simplify the debian/rules using (dh $@) but i think
> > > i don't understa
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:49:41PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
...
> >"Only" during a freeze ends up meaning "six months or longer". You
> >think that's a short time? It's one full Ubuntu release cycle!
>
> There's no reason Debian freezes must last six months or longer. Still, even
Hi,
Anyway, the uploaded packge is unblocked :-)
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:34:04AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> OK. The goal there was to prevent downstreams from shipping xpdf
> alongside an incompatible poppler, which Ubuntu looks on course to do
> [0]. If you know of an appropriate soluti
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 09:36:21PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
...
> let's move on to upload xpdf in nice shape.
>
> * xpdf 3.02-10 (as planned, please finalize git by tommorow.)
I reviewd your recent changes to packahes and reverted followings:
* 5ebeca9c23695beaadf120f849
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:22:38AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
V> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:20:23 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:03:08 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > At this point, we should not upload this trivial fix but we need to wait
> > > p
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 05:52:48PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.4-1.2
> of my package "poppler".
>
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poppler
> - Sour
thinking a bit different tone.
> Sorry for the unsolicited opinion, but I've been reading the New
> Maintainer's guide lately. For what it's worth, I'm always happy to help
> with phrasing, since I'm a native English speaker, and have a lot of editing
> experie
Hi,
NM guide updates was done basically without ML posting until recently
since it was mostly factual fixes and BTS was good enough.
I just added RFA related thing in the last updates. I realize, it is
about time to get more exposure :-)
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:45:41AM +0900, Ansgar Burchard
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:27:49PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I do not want to have to upload svn snapshots each time a
> debian-specific thing needs to be adjusted.
Then use old upstream tar and upload updated debian-specific
debian.tar.gz while bumping debian version only.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi,
It is complicated.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:45:59PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Osamu Aoki writes:
> > =
> > Case 2: package transition rule
> > All the contents of the package foo i
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 05:48:16PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Osamu Aoki [100726 17:27]:
> > =
> > Case 2: package transition rule
> > All the contents of the package foo is incorpora
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 01:05:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Osamu Aoki writes:
> > =
> > Case 1: only one package r
Hi folks,
Breaks field was added to policy in 3.8 and current stable dpkg supports
it as I understand. So we are ready to use it, as I understand.
Under this new situation, I would like to confirm what is the best
practice for each case scenario. Please comment on my thought as below:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:13:33PM +0200, Dr. Tilo Levante wrote:
> Am 18.07.2010 15:04, schrieb Paul Wise:
> >The bug report mentions security issues, I assume those are associated
> >with the embedded code copy of xpdf mentioned in the bug report.
> >poppler is a shared library fork of xpdf. Mov
Hi,
I just uploaded xpdf and then realized I was not closing bug for the
changelog entries from un-uploaaed versions.
I just closed them manually but what did I miss to be like this.
Is there some trick to indicate previos upload was not the previous
version in pbuilder or debuild?
I know it is
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:03:46AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> That is my preference also (and I also like the use of git-dch, but I
> don't know about Michael[1][2]).
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580621#94
> [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580621
; urgency=low
* Reactivate zoomFitHeight properly by merging it into fix-580495.patch.
* Set VCS-* and Uploaders fields.
-- Osamu Aoki Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:00:23 +0900
Question: Can I upload as this?
Osamu
PS: If you agree, can we replace proper git repo with my user one? then
workin on
Hi,
I must have been confused. I only have question on 1 patch.
=== 02-permissions.patch ===
This is not dropped and fine. Since ENFORCE_PERMISSIONS is not defined
in normal package building of Debian, I think this disables
ENFORCE_PERMISSIONS codes as expected.
=== xpdf-zoom-height.patch
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:07:37PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > I don't know if this would help you, but the canonical (lintian) way to
> > check that everything is OK is like this:
> >
> > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 MANWIDTH=80 man --warnings -E UTF-8 -l >/dev/null
>
> You'll of course see the warni
wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 01:56:14 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:10:14PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > > > Is this because you are using poppler?
> > >
> > > yes. the vulnerabilities exist only in the xpdf codebase that became
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:10:14PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Is this because you are using poppler?
>
> yes. the vulnerabilities exist only in the xpdf codebase that became
> poppler. i no longer build any of that affected code (dynamically
> linking to it in poppler instead where it is al
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:02:21PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following packages currently prepared and am waiting for
> review by interested sponsors. Some of these have been pending since
> December 2009).
>
> xpdf (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpdf):
>
Hi,
If you translate with po files, what kind of merge/rebase strategy
should we use? Does any one know best hook script to automation of
merging with msgmerge?
Simple git merge is too much manual fix. Is there good way to run
$ msgmerge ...
While we run merge/rebase
Pointer to doc and scri
Hi,
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:53:54AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:27:29AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Marc Haber
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:12:40AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I have uploaded a new package to
> h
Hi,
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 09:43:22PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
...
> Ahem, I see, mistakes happen, thus clean chroots (and note to myself: clean
> apt caches;-) are to be used for such tweaking. In fact, other packages'
> {Build-}dependencies change over time, it is pretty common since new
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 03:16:13PM +0200, James Stuckey wrote:
> > So I'm not able to have debian-multimedia in my sources when I use
> > pbuilder?
You can have it.
> I commented out the dmm line from my sources, and then deleted it, and I'm
> still getting the same error from pbuilder.
Have yo
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:57:39PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:07:11 +0200
> Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> > * Tony Houghton , 2010-05-14, 15:41:
> > >Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per
> > >the example in the New Maintainers' Guide, but when I mov
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:39:53PM +0200, James Stuckey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm interested in learning more about development/packaging on Debian. I've
> downloaded some source to package, ran dh_make on it, and now I'm trying to
> use pbuilder to create a package from it.
>
> When I run "pbuild
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:29:39AM +0300, Zaar Hai wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >
> > In that case, teh suggestion is to use debhelper 7, that "mimik" the
> > cdbs "small" debian/rules but in a sane way, without the black magic
> > cdbs introduces (cdbs is easy fo
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:45:44PM +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Le jeudi 08 avril 2010, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> > I do not know active use of binary-indep by itself. Anyone knows?
> > (I know some makefile has binary: binary-indep binary-arch.)
>
> I do not know what yo
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:23:02AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
...
> In general, I find mixing explicit target definitions and wildcard rules
> really confusing.
Yes, indeed. I will steal this phrase into maint-guide as footnote :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.deb
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:48:26PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> Well, this is just wrong. As you can find in Debian Policy, the binary
> target has to depend on binary-arch and -indep which is not provided
> here. There isn't much to document. It's standard Makefile behavior.
Excuse me. I can n
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:19:33PM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote:
> Guys,
> I am still confused about my initial question when which binary-*
> target in debian/rules is called.
>
> This also concerns:
> - http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-dreq.en.html#s-rules
> - http://www.debian.or
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:24:44PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> And it's a know limitation of dpkg-buildpackage that we have only
> "debian/rules build" when we should have build-arch and build-indep just
> like for binary.
OK. Somehow I was expecting too much. I now reread that section of
po
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 02:57:41PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > What is needed is documentation on dh_listpackages and its usage to sort
> > out binary-indep and binary-arch difference for override commands.
> >
> > Otherwi
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:21:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> And if one wanted to be picky, you could note that the sequence for
> binary-indep does not include dh_strip, dh_makeshlibs and dh_shlibdeps.
Good points.
FEW files missing in the following chapter are:
NEWS
TODO
Also .ex t
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:17:49PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Aside from the issues discussed with Mike ...
> >
> > reality is once "debian/rules binary" is run, there is no need to run
> > "debian/rules binary-indep" nor "debian/rules binary-arch". All the
> > piecees of actions have been don
Hi,
Thanks. I am rethinking few things.
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:07:34PM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll try to make myself clearer:
>
> the question is: why is e.g. debian/rules binary-indep never called on
> a binary independent package, assume a PHP app.
Aside from the iss
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:30:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > The commands listed below are run twice, once with the "-a" option (in
> > binary-arch) and once with the "-i" option (in binary-indep):
>
> Actually, it doesn't. dh binary just runs whatever sequence is necessary
> for t
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:37:41AM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> today, I have a question regarding the maintainers guide, which says:
You must be reading one from squeeze or subversion one which is enen
newer.
> "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary"
Hi,
Aside from license issue.
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 02:20:16PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I dislike the duplication and the iceweasel/mozilla style license[1].
This DUPLICATION is real problem, since asian fonts are large files.
...
> It is a shame IPA doesn't use standard FLOSS practices lik
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 02:00:58PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Jun Kobayashi wrote:
>
> > If there are any changes, the name must be changed. So no patches are
> > permitted with the name "IPA Font".
> >
> > This is stated in Article 3 of IPA Font License:
> > http:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 01:24:42PM +0200, Wuttke, Joachim wrote:
> Thank you, Niels:
> there is indeed a problem with the directories:
> dpkg-buildpackage builds directories
> liblmmin3/
> tmp/
> but not
> liblmmin-dev/
>
> $ cat rules
> #!/usr/bin/make -f
> # -*- makefile -*-
> %:
>
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:31:58PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:31:41PM +0100, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> > In fact, I am looking for a documentation that explains what dh $@ does
> > for each call, and what the dh_auto_* do. The new maintainer guide gives
> > some
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:31:41PM +0100, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Le lundi 22 mars 2010, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> > If you have "binary" and "build" targets explicitly mentioned in
> > debian/rules, it is time to update it :-)
> >
> > Anyway, ma
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:18:22PM +0700, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Looks like some part of the HTML generation is broken:
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ch-dreq.en.html#s-rules
>
> "Debian Policy Manu
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 01:07:12AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Osamu Aoki writes:
>
> > If you have "binary" and "build" targets explicitly mentioned in
> > debian/rules, it is time to update it :-)
>
> AFAIK, the standard debian/rules targets are no
Hi,
If you have "binary" and "build" targets explicitly mentioned in
debian/rules, it is time to update it :-)
After experimenting with new debhelper dh syntax a bit, I finally got up
speed with dpkg source format 3.0 (quilt).
I was surprised to find out how simple package has become with debhel
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 09:50:23AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Osamu Aoki writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:43:28PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
...
> > I usually add package dependency to "locales-all|locales". Then
> > pbuilder nor any build environment sh
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:43:28PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ben Finney writes:
> > Russ Allbery writes:
...
> > In a minimal ‘pbuilder’ environment, this is happening all the time for
> > me now. What should users of ‘pbuilder’ be doing to avoid this problem?
>
> Install locales in you
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 03:09:55PM -0300, Mauro Lizaur wrote:
> 2009-09-02, gregor herrmann:
>
> > On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:19:15 -0700, Don Raikes wrote:
> >
> > > This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some debian
> > > packages, and would like to put them onto a personal package
Please no HTML mail on ML :-)
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:46:24PM +0100, M. Peterson wrote:
> Hello
>
> we need help to make a .deb package out of a source for linux binary
> Homepage:
> http://retromessenger.sf.net
Looks interesting.
Please follow guidance given at:
http://www.debian.org/
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 07:16:50AM +0200, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> Hi mentors,
>
> I read the Debian policy to create my package and i read this at chapter
> "6.1 Introduction to package maintainer scripts"
>
> "The package management system looks at the exit status from these
> scripts. *It is
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 06:31:03PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:47:51 +0900
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know there is a way to do it
>
> ??
dh_gencontrol as I posted in another message.
As I remember, it was used befor
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 12:10:16PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Any suggestion for debian/rules ? or pointer to good example.
>
> You can't really do this, AFAIK. You can break the source into 2
> separate source packages that each build one packa
.
* Is this still useful technique?
* Is this the best method?
* Does anyone know recent ftp mater behavior on such trick?
Let me reply to you as below
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 04:05:05PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 23:35 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi,
> &g
Hi,
Suppose source foo_1.0.tar.gz produces:
foo-updated_1.0_all.deb
foo-static_1.0_all.deb
Then with next source foo_1.1.tar.gz with updated contents will produce
now with normal build script:
foo-updated_1.1_all.deb (updated from foo-updated_1.0_all.deb)
foo-static_1.1_all.deb (same as fo
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:50:06PM +0800, Zhengpeng Hou wrote:
> I upgraded this in ubuntu 2 years ago, if minghua have no time, I
> would like to help.
Please. I have been sponsor for him and I know he will appreciate if
you can help. (You may add you to uploader so it will not NMU.)
Osamu
--
Hi,
Is there any one who is willing to update scim-pinyin: 0.5.0-4.1 -> 0.5.91-1
It is very behing upstream.
Regards,
Osamu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi and thanks for pointing out.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:15:06AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
...
> > This should have been "In copyright" file describing license term in the
> > package, you (Mr. Li) have:"
> >
> > > > LGPL-2+ can also be treated as version 2.1 of GNU Lesser General Public
> > > >
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:59:41PM +0800, Zhengpeng Hou wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> > What I know as a part of SCIM package team:
> > * The KDE libraries were behind Gnome ones to support immodule.
> > * Some SCIM package seems to disable skim support by the maintainer patch.
> this is not what
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 08:27:32AM +0800, Zhengpeng Hou wrote:
> 2008/6/22 LI Daobing (李道兵) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > 2008/6/22 ZhengPeng Hou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:43:18AM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Would u mind tell me how to use
Hi Bas,
I may have made confusing statement for casual observer...
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:09:02PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:06:27AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > In License, you have:
This should have been "In copyright" file describing license
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:00:50AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:42:21PM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > scim-tables 0.5.8-1 is ready, in this new upstream, 3 new input
> > methods added. and one new language su
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:42:21PM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> scim-tables 0.5.8-1 is ready, in this new upstream, 3 new input
> methods added. and one new language supported (Ukrainian).
>
> you can check the package at [1] or [2].
>
> [1] dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:10:19PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scim-array".
> The upload would fix ITP: #452867
> The package is lintian clean.
>
> * Package name : scim-array
> Version: 0.0.4-1
> Upstream
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:04:30PM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I got a question from the upstream, the source tarball contains GPL
> and LGPL code, and this source tarball can generate several packages.
> can I release one package in GPL and another in LGPL?
>
> Thanks
Hi,
I have changed svn content. Explanation below. Please ack these
changes are OK then we can do upload.
> >> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> >> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-python
> >> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 11:39:09PM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scim-python".
> * Package name: scim-python
> Version : 0.1.12
> Upstream Authors: Huang Peng
> Ming Hua
> Yu F
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:33:10AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I would be glad if someone sponsored it.
>
> Update: It has already been uploaded. Thanks sjr for the
> sponsorship.
Would yo
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 05:04:34PM +0200, Dionysis Kalofonos wrote:
> Thank you Daniel.
For starting, read some basic docs in DDP/
http://www.debian.org/doc
Debian Policy
Developers Reference
Debian GNU/Linux FAQ
Debian New Maintainers' Guide
Debian Reference (my main work)
should get you s
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:57:29PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Now that I checked latest command, -i and -I without argument seems
> > to be good enough since current default regexp is very exhaustive.
>
> Okay. In this ca
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 02:33:44PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:31:21PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > > Ben Finney wrote:
> > >
> > > > What would be the best way to kee
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:31:21PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > What would be the best way to keep such a directory in place, but
> > exclude the directory from the Debian source and binary packages?
>
> dpkg-source -i"regexp"?
I am too lazy to type extra regexp
I hav
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:37:07AM -0800, Doug Rintoul wrote:
> Ming Hua wrote:
>> Scim package is already set up to handle all_ALL, it just doesn't set it
s/Scim/im-switch/
>> to default (and it shouldn't). I believe no packages that currently use
>> im-switch change all_ALL by default.
> Can y
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 05:31:20PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> > And I will use the debconf question to offer to set im-switch to
> > scim-immodule if you think that would be acceptable.
>
> I have absolutely no problem with that. Im-switch setting, being a part
> of the alternative system, is alway
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:52:38PM -0800, Doug Rintoul wrote:
> Ming Hua wrote:
>> I am curious about how you are going to set im-switch though. Are you
>> going to set them just for several specific languages? Or are you going
>> to set the all_ALL (pseudo-)locale setting? Or is there another way
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 04:08:45PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:05:36PM -0800, Doug Rintoul wrote:
> > Ming Hua wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:15:32AM -0800, Doug Rintoul wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have taken out the im-switch stuff (at least the preinst prerm) fr
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:09:06PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:23:02PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > All data files should be in UTF-8 [...] you cannot inflict data
> > > loss on other
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:08:53PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ben Finney wrote:
> >
> > > (Assuming, of course, that I'm correct in saying lenny is supposed to
> > > support UTF-8 throughout, and that failure to do so is a bug.)
> >
> > Can somebo
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:23:02PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:24:08AM +0100, David Given wrote:
> > Ben Finney wrote:
> > [...]
> > > That sounds like a bug. I was under the impression that the default
> > > encoding of everything in lenny was supposed to be UTF-8
Hi,
I was unclear.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:59:44PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > >> > > I moved to debian/patches with dpatch. Is this a reasonable
> > > >> > > solution?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > use what you like. I usually find quilt simpler, but really, I care
> > > >> > muc
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 11:38:55PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Osamu Aoki [Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:59:20 +0900]:
>
> > If someone makes checking on the archive "how many packages build
> > depends on dpatch and quit", and tell me quilt is getting enough
> > p
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:40:26AM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Le Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 11:31:06AM -0700, Brandon Philips a écrit :
> >> > >
> >> > > I moved to debian/patches with dpatch. Is this a reasonable solution?
> >> >
>
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 11:31:06AM -0700, Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 10:24 Tue 20 Mar 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Brandon Philips wrote:
> > > On 18:35 Sun 18 Mar 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:08:17PM -0800, Brandon P
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
