On Thu, February 7, 2008 10:15, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le 7 févr. 08 à 02:11, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit :
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Zerofree finds the unallocated, non-zeroed blocks in an ext2 or ext3
file-system and fills them with zeroes. This is useful if the
Olivier Berger wrote:
Hello.
I'm considering applying for maintainer of a couple packages, and I
wondered if Debian had some policy on preferring professional or
personal email addresses for maintainers.
I must admin I haven't read all the documentation yet... but it was not
obvious from
Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
Hello,
I have patched turkey to solve an ftbfs in Ubuntu gutsy (thanks
especially to the work of Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz) and made some
general update and clean up; I attach the patch to this email.
I was told by a Debian QA person that since turkey is currently
Tim Hull wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Anyway, I am curious what exactly it entails to become a Debian developer,
and what would be best to do if one wanted to involve
oneself in Debian with this ultimate goal. I do know of a couple things
that aren't packaged that I may want to take a stab at at some
Andreas Putzo wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgettext-commons-java.
* Package name: libgettext-commons-java
Version : 0.9-1
Upstream Author : Felix Berger (Gettext Commons project)
* URL :
If you are not already aware of it, there is discussion on debian-vote
about Debian Maintainers - letting people maintain
specific packages in the archive without being full developers.
I thought I would mention it here as non-DDs are not too likely to read
d-vote, but might be greatly affected
On Thu, April 5, 2007 2:36 pm, andremachado wrote:
Hello, Magnus
Many thanks for your answer.
There are some variables defined at /debian/rules
BUILDDIR := debian/php-java-bridge
DESTDIR := ${CURDIR}/${BUILDDIR}
PHP_EXT_DIR := $(shell /usr/bin/php-config --extension-dir)
Daniel Leidert wrote:
Hello,
For docbook-xsl I merge two tarballs together docbook-xsl-x.y.z.tar.gz
and docbook-xsl-doc-x.y.z.tar.gz. Where should I mention this?
debian/README.Debian or better debian/copyright?
Regards, Daniel
Definitely README.Debian; probably a good idea in copyright,
On Mon, February 19, 2007 1:38 pm, Sam Morris wrote:
I am packaging the nemiver debugger, which has a new version that has
split some of its functionality into a libnemiver-common library. The
library is probably not very useful without nemiver itself being
installed.
Is it ok to avoid
Sam Morris wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 18:11 +, Paul Cager wrote:
On Mon, February 19, 2007 2:37 pm, Sam Morris wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:10:06 +, Paul Cager wrote:
On Mon, February 19, 2007 1:38 pm, Sam Morris wrote:
I am packaging the nemiver debugger, which has a new version
Neil Williams wrote:
There are plenty of tools that help create manpages without having to
understand the Groff/troff format. help2man can take your STDOUT usage
message and convert that to a usable manpage, doclifter can then take
that manpage and create XML that is easier to edit and gives
I'm packaging myserver (http://www.myserverproject.net). It uses OpenSSL
to serve HTTPS requests, and contains the following in its license:
MyServer is released under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL)
with the additional exception that compiling, linking, and using OpenSSL
is
After the previous discussions on blank lines in a file, I thought I
would share a lintian warning message I encountered. Took me a couple of
minutes to work out what it meant. It was something like this:
`conffile `' is not readable.'
Due to a blank line in debian/conffiles
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
Could someone please check my packaging of the AFNIX compiler/interpreter?
* Package name: afnix
Version : 1.4.2-1
* URL : www.afnix.org
* License : BSD-like
The package is lintian/linda clean, and
Can I just check that we are still allowed to upload to unstable while
testing is frozen? (Or rather, in my case, to ask a sponsor to upload).
Thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
* Mikhail Gusarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-01 14:13]:
After watching debian-mentors@ for a some time, I've found two types
of suggestions frequenly advised to the packagers:
* Removing empty lines from the end of debian/copyright,
debian/changelog
* Using two spaces before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eng. Mina Ramses wrote:
The problem is when I tried to package it, I found that the license
was a Sun Binary License which is not compatible with DFSG (it's not
free for Debian). I asked the author and he claimed it's under BSD
which is OK for
Andreas Fester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul,
you should definitely read
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
It should answer most of your questions, including package layout and
the role of -dev packages.
Thanks - this is exactly the sort of thing I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you are able to help me with some problems I am having packaging an
application with some shared objects (.so libraries), I would be very
grateful. I know very little about SOs, and even after a bit of research
on the web I'm still not sure of the
Daniel Baumann wrote:
there are a few glitches i would correct:
... ...
if you fix above things, i'm happy to sponsor it.
Daniel,
Many thanks for the above comments, which I have now fixed. Thank you
too for offering to upload, but Ricardo Mones, who has sponsored some of
my previous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Mentors,
Please can I have comments about my packaging of id3tools, which I
intend to adopt.
It is lintian clean and builds in a pbuilder environment. It fixes bugs
280180, 363953, 400360.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- -
Marcus,
Thanks for your comments, which I have applied to my packaging.
Regarding your comment:
I don't think the repackaging of the upstream zip file into a tarball
warrants a README.Debian-source file, so I would remove that.
I put this in because of section 6.7.8.2 in the Developers'
James Westby wrote:
On (22/11/06 15:31), Paul Cager wrote:
I don't think the repackaging of the upstream zip file into a tarball
warrants a README.Debian-source file, so I would remove that.
I put this in because of section 6.7.8.2 in the Developers' Reference
seemed to require
Im intending to adopt the java2html package and Ive produced an updated
source package. When I run lintian against the source (passing the -I
flag), I get an information message:
I: java2html: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
usr/share/man/man1/java2html.1.gz:39
N:
N: Manual page
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.2-4
of package java2html. I am hoping to adopt this package. This is my
first attempt at package adoption, and I hope someone will be able to
check the package for any silly errors.
The package is lintian and linda clean.
The
25 matches
Mail list logo
