Is there any way to figure out what directory does not exist? (control
member)
Thank You
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Paul Elliott
wrote:
> Ok, I deleted my old sbuild chroot for debian testing.
>
> I then created two sbuild chroot according to the wiki instructions.
>
> For
I was getting a different error complaining
that debfoster does not exist under "testing". BTW why does debfoster fail
to exist under testing?
Any ideas what the problem is with the above error? As far as I can figure
out sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy does not eve
. The users want to put sbuild back to
the way it was just after sbuild was installed.
What is the proper way to do that?
Thank You for your answers.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com 3300 Plaza Drive, apt 1
http
I am looking at upgrading my gpg key.
What parameters should I use?
Is there a standard way to get all the people that signed
the old key to sign the new key?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com 3300 Plaza Drive
ght:
> *DEP-5 convention is to use GPL-3+ instead of GPL-3.0+
> *Remove the "<" and ">" signs from the "Source:" field.
> *Include the licensing information for the build files like aclocal.m4,
> configure, m4/* and build-aux/*
> *There are some file
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:39:21PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
your other points appear to be correct, I will work on it.
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:42:36 -0500
> Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Please criticize the package I have been working on
> > https://github.com/pelliott80/si
shape for debian.
Package now has no lintian errors, except for lack of PGP
signatures, and that is an upstream problem.
Best wishes to all, and thank you.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:22:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Paul Elliott wrote:
>
> > The two sets of data are disjoint.
>
> Your initial mail made it sound like two packages have data in common.
> Since they actually have no data in com
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:55:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Paul Elliott wrote:
>
> > The new package contains data most people won't want. It is big. 69M
> > But those who need this data, need it. By creating a different package,
>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:25:41AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > ...
>
> Your mail doesn't include which package/data you are talking. It is
> very hard to give you correct advice when we aren't being given the
&
Because of hard links and other software
smoke and mirrors?
What are the pitfalls?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX
is for an idea?
Use /etc/schroot/sbuild/copyfiles
to copy the .dep files into the sbuild chroot
then use --pre-build-commands "dpkg -i my.dep"
on the command line to install the additional packages.
Do you think it would work?
What would go wrong? What should I lookout for?
Thank Y
et the one package that is not in unstable
(libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev) into sbuild's list of packages for a
test build?
Thank you for considering this question.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Bl
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:04:28PM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:45:19AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Is there any way the removal of maitreya from testing
> > can be delayed until after the new version of sqlite3
> > becomes available in unstable?
&
update the changelog and the version number
with "dch -i" and import that into git.
Then I will check that I have not broken anything, and that
maitreya still builds and works.
I will then notify my DD about the new package release and the
need for an upload.
I have slowly learned this
list, probably also have to
use unstable.
So I ask what is a inexpensive video card for a PCI express 16
slot, that works well under unstable with free drivers?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric
t;autorm" from testing may sound a bit scary, but it's really just
> a way to make transitions less painful. If a package does get
> removed by this, once a fixed upload is made to unstable, it'll
> migrate back to testing in the usual way. But it's 4 weeks off, so
>
nd the new functionality, how do I find its
include files and how do I link to it?
In my opinion they should not be removing old functionality
without saying exactly where the new functionality is in the same
message!
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-
files, which does
to leave unclear subprocess, which is well documented and whose
build-depends dependencies are clear and documented.
What are others experience?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:56:49AM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Le dimanche 11 mai 2014 à 21:33 -0500, Paul Elliott a écrit :
>
> It happened to me this sunday (got caught by the llvm-3.4 upgrade).
> I carefully downgrade each package recently updated, as logged
> in /var/log/apt/hi
F4, F5...)? Did you
> try a previous kernel from the grub boot menu?
I logged in using ctrl-alt-f1. Tried restarting gdm3, then
stopping gdm3, using kdm instead. Did not work.
Stopping the dm, and login as user, and startx did not work.
The previous kernel did not help.
>
> Best,
>
of work around that will let you
keep working somehow?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
---
"Encryption works. Pro
how scarce such ports are.)
>
The reason to make it privileged would be to prevent
spoofing by non-privileged users.
perhaps one of the crpto based authentication strategies, (ssh, ssl)
would be better for the general case. But these are expensive of cpu
cycles.
--
Paul Elliott
and reciever need to share a privledged port.
What is the official way of getting one of these allocated in
/etc/services?
Thank you.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http
unter arguments against removing the version number
from the .pc filename?
Thank you for considering this question.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ A
ount 2) as true!
What do the Debian experts think?
I always update the debian/libsweX.symbols file for a new
release. In this case it shows no new symbols.
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blv
What is the official way to add additional -D definitions
to the gcc command line from the debian/rules file?
Is it DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND ?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
Is it OK to have a shared library multi arch with
the corresponding -dev package not multi arch?
The the -dev package contains some utilitiy arch dep executables and
thus can not be made multi arch?
Thank you.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli
it?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday, May 12, 2012 11:00:04 PM Ben Finney wrote:
> Paul Elliott writes:
> > I have a really long Build-Depends: line.
> >
> > Multiple Build-Depends: lines is an error.
>
> I think you mean “multiple Build-Depends fields”. Yes, that's an error.
>
>
n
that is easy to read.
Is there anyway to prettify these lines?
Hard to read code can lead to bugs.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX
this new one should be merged with the old one 661664.
I don't know how to do that, or if I have the privs.
>
> * Paul Elliott , 2012-02-28, 18:32:
> >dget -x
> >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyswisseph/pyswisseph_1.
> >77.00-0-3.dsc
>
>
ound at
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openastro.org/openastro.org_1.
> 1.25+dfsg-4.dsc
>
> Regards,
> Ansgar
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
The file glibmmconfig.h exists but is in an archetecture
dependant place:
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/glibmm-2.4/include/glibmmconfig.h
Is this problem a bug in any of the packages I am using?
If so, what is the work around?
If it is a flaw in my program, what is the most
elegant fix?
T
ebhelper (>= 7.0.50)"
* use X-Python-Version, not XS-Python-Version
* remove XB-Python-Version.
* make openastromod private; move /usr/share/openastro.org
Regards,
Paul Elliott
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rded: line.
* add newline to override file.
* change name to python-swisseph
* rebuild pydoc from source.
* create a documentation package
* create a python3 version of this extension
- using recommendations in:
- http://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide
Regards,
Pa
* patch from upstreams adds more types
* update git Format: field
* Initial release. (Closes: 663273)
* get rid of old version numbering system
* not a ds package anymore. upstream has a tarball!
* new watch file
* use debian/install
* update debian/copyright for new tarball
Re
move ALL of the "convenience copies of code". That way
the unused code would not confuse anyone.
I thought, that when creating a dfsg tarball, one should remove only the files
with licensing problems.
What is the proper procedure? Remove only the unsourced binaries, or all of
the unuse
oad since it results in immediate
> feedback.
The following error message shows why I don't use http:
> $ dput mentors *.changes
> Checking signature on .changes
> gpg: Signature made Mon 16 Apr 2012 03:35:24 PM CDT using DSA key ID
> 345CDD99 gpg: Good signature from "Paul El
nitial release. (Closes: 663273)
* get rid of old version numbering system
* not a ds package anymore. upstream has a tarball!
* new watch file
* use debian/install
* update debian/copyright for new tarball
Regards,
Paul Elliott
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
. Over 1/2 hour gone by no message from the email
notifiication system. Either success or failure.
My packages link still does not show the upload.
Help.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
part 3.3, has been written as (\d\.\d) so uscan can abstract the
version numbers.
And it includes the part that will be thrown away "\?rev=.*".
Thanks to David Paleino for helping me with this.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...
/api.opensuse.org:443/public/source/LibreOffice:Unstable/libreoffice-converter/libreoffice-converter-(\d\.\d)\.tar\.bz2
It does not find a match.
What am I doing wrong?
If I can get this working, I will post it so everyone can have watch files for
OBS.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)83
rgency=low
* new upstream release 3.3.34.1
libreoffice-converter (3.3.32.1+ds-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: 663273)
* rules make. No Makefile.
* enable Vcs fields. git repository in collab-maint
Regards,
Paul Elliott
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
questions:
Assuming I have the url of the source rpm, how would one write the watch file
and get-orig-source: in rules to create a proper .ds tarball?
Do I need to put rpm2cpio and cpio in Build-depends: ? Do I need to note this
dependancy anywhere?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott
26/buildd-workarounds/
but it feels too kludgy.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
then
run under all architectures.
My question is what happens in this case? Will the build system take the
build results from one of the "good" architectures, ( that is architectures
where the package does build successfully,) and give the results of that build
to the bad archite
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 05:19:48 PM Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Paul Elliott , 2012-03-01, 14:03:
> >On the issue of the pdfs, those pdfs are rebuilt from source in another
> >package that depends on this package.
>
> Personally, I don't buy the “source is in another pac
ith bug number in the subject.)
>
> I don't intend to sponsor this package, but here's my review:
>
> * Paul Elliott , 2012-02-28, 18:32:
> >dget -x
> >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyswisseph/pyswisseph_1.
> >77.00-0-3.dsc
>
and never used, of
something that is regenerated from source in an external package?
If it is OK, in this case, to just delete the pdfs and html, where should I
note the problem?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181,
Regards,
Paul Elliott
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=U
on program that is also being RFSed:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/openastro.org
Changes since the last upload:
* ephe_path should be "/usr/share/libswe/ephe2:/usr/share/libswe/ephe"
* upgrade to Standards-Version: 3.9.3
Regards,
Paul Elliott
-- System Information:
De
Is there any archive where I can get obsolete superseded uploads to debian
unstable? I need to get one for historical reasons.
Thank You
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http
The new standard allows "any all" in the Architecture field.
Please explain this new feature. What does it do and under what circumstances
should it be used?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB
ion number of the previous changelog entry."
I had forgotten about the -sa switch the first time packaging for
mentors.debian.net something for which the upstream had packaged and
distributed outside of debian with the same version number.
I still think I should have gotten an
/mgit$
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I use to create my git info? git-dpm? StGit?
Thank You for your response.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
--
To
om now on, I would convert once to
docbook, or some other civilized format and then say that the .docbook file was
the source. But I am not writing the documentation, so I can't do that.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com
arch indpendant part? What do the true
experts think?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
<635672 is the bug number of your
> ITP> * done dh_make much configuring remains to be done.
> * remove emacsen-*
...
Why does packaging not see this? Have I made a mistake?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com
full" build and can I be sure that a full build will never occur in
the autobuilder?
If I make a fix to this problem, how can I test that it will work in the
autobuilder's evnironment?
Thank you for helping a beginning packager fix a bug.
--
Paul Elliott
the case of people like me, a full packaging project is too
much; I should just get a svn repository in the collab-maint project.
I have an alioth -guest account. How do I get a svn repository in the collab-
maint project?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:18:24 AM Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Paul Elliott blackpatchpanel.com> writes:
> > Thank You for looking at it.
>
> Sorry, only got a chance to look at over the weekend. Both packages are
> looking good but I do have some questions. Why
On Monday, November 14, 2011 11:41:40 PM Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Paul Elliott blackpatchpanel.com> writes:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libswe".
>
> I'll do it. There has been a longstanding request for the Swiss Ephemeris
> from users. I
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 03:01:57 AM Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Paul Elliott]
>
> > B
> >
> > > If all linkings are shared, it is my understanding that the global
> > > state of the multiple-linked library would be shared by all
> > > referen
On Saturday, November 19, 2011 07:27:14 PM you wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:03:19PM -0600, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Is there any requirement that a shared library be reentrant, if the
> > upstream wrote it that way?
> >
> > Am I correct in my assumption, t
correct?
I ask these questions, because I have encountered someone who believes
differently.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "swe-standard-data".
* Package name: swe-standard-data
Version : 3-1
Upstream Author (data): Dieter Koch ,Alois Treindl
Upstream Author (tarball): Paul Elliott
* URL
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libswe".
* Package name: libswe
Version : 1.77.00.0003-1
Upstream Author (code): Dieter Koch , Alois Treindl
Upstream Author (autotools package): Paul Elliott
* URL
"Details about package" page there is a delete option, but no way
to delete earlier versions of the package, (which may be obsolete), without
deleting the whole thing!
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 M
doc/manuals/maint-guide/modify.en.html#quiltrc
recomends adding the line:
>QUILT_PATCH_OPTS="--reject-format=unified"
to ~/.quiltrc-dpkg
Which is correct?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:26:21 PM Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals
(RainCT) wrote:
> 2011/11/2 Paul Elliott :
> > I have put in a patch to change all references to this script. This
> > includes references in the build procedure. Therefore, the renaming must
> >
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 05:50:29 AM Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Am 02.11.2011 11:36, schrieb Paul Elliott:
> > Because of Debian Policy Manual section 10.4 (Scripts)
> >
> > I must rename a script.
> >
> > What is the proper
problems to deal with.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Does anyone have a list of the most common errors that can not be caught by
lintian because they require human judgment to detect?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 03:15:46 PM Russ Allbery wrote:
> Paul Elliott writes:
> > Before I filed an ITP the upstream was his own maintainer distributing
> > outside of debian. His changelog uses his web page instead of his email
> > address.
> >
> > N
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 03:29:56 AM Ben Finney wrote:
> Paul Elliott writes:
> > Could someone write a how to on how to setup a packaging project on
> > Alioth?
>
> As I understand it, one criterion used by the Alioth admins when
> deciding whether a project is ac
maintainer did?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
pe to package into a
form that can be added to Debian. I am tired of doing a cp -ax to provide
myself a way to revert a possible mistake.
I usually use svn.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Su
that comming from?
In any case, if I must split out a font package, how do I do it? Are there any
examples out there?
Thank You
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpane
ribl.com. (state 18).
This is a small family domain. I control it. It goes thru google email. only 2
accounts in domain. All the computers on it use linux. It is extremely
unlikely any spam has ever been sent from this domain.
Could someone white list this domain so that I can par
.orig.tar.gz
but it is raw text in the web page, not in a link. How would one write a watch
file for this? I want to pick up files of the form :
openastro.org_(.*).orig.tar.gz
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900
On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 01:22:15 AM Paul McEnery wrote:
> On 18 October 2011 06:02, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Any suggestions?
>
> GitHub? I use them for my package repos, and I see that MythTV recently (in
> the last few months) switched to
taste.
I signed up at savanah, but they have not even assigned my two create project
requests even though their automated system says they should have been done 5
days ago. No one responds to me.
I must move my projects before berlios closes.
Any suggestions?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott
/debexpo.git;a=blob;f=debexpo/cr
> onjobs/removeolduploads.py;h=e710b2b05f31f3ba72bd3221d1be9ef4828bcb5b;hb=re
> fs/heads/devel
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.c
e-standard-data/swe-standard-data_2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Paul Elliott
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatc
-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Paul Elliott
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX
/home/pelliott/develop/astrology/newlibswe/deb2sid/try$ dput
mentors-ftp swe-standard-data_2-1_i386.changes
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made Sun 09 Oct 2011 02:59:05 AM CDT using DSA key ID 345CDD99
gpg: Good signature from "Paul Elliott "
gpg: aka "
this project
is 2.2Meg does this mean I must split out a seperate -doc package?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signatur
system says:
W: libswe source: newer-standards-version 3.9.2 (current is 3.9.1)
Must I have some special version of debian to develop, or is there some
trick?
Thank You
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd
age for me.
Kind regards,
Paul Elliott
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
debian.net/package/libswe
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libswe/libswe_1.77.00.0001-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Paul Elliott
--
Pa
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 03:41:39 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Uploading swe-standard-data_1-1_all.deb: Upload failed: 502 Bad
> > Gateway
>
> ...
>
> >for res in getaddrinfo(host, port, 0, SOCK_STREAM
001-1_i386.changes
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made Fri 23 Sep 2011 06:38:14 PM CDT using DSA key ID 345CDD99
gpg: Good signature from "Paul Elliott "
gpg: aka "Paul Elliott "
Good signature on /home/pelliott/develop/astrology/newlibswe/deb2/try/s
package so people can find fault with it!
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
ephauto%3Aswe-standard-data
Please inform me of any mistakes or flaws.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Descripti
are not in the public
interface. The inteface includes global varriables. (I did not write this
program.)
What should I do?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpan
your answers in that light. Thank You.
On Monday, August 22, 2011 04:54:20 AM Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Paul Elliott writes:
> > I quote from Debian Library Packaging guide
> >
> >> 2. -DEV package dependencies
> >>
> >> The -DEV package would
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 11:06:35 PM Fernando Lemos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Paul Elliott
>
> wrote:
> > I quote from Debian Library Packaging guide
> >
> >> 2. -DEV package dependencies
> >>
> >> The -DEV pack
ome the the debian/control file
for libtar_1.2.11-6 does not list such a dependancy?
it includes .
I have been using it as a model, cause it has already gone thru the
process.
I am probably missing something.
Thank you for clearing up my confusion.
--
Paul Elliott
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
