Bug#678705: New release

2012-06-26 Thread Phillip Susi
I found a bug that corrupted files with holes in them and am preparing to upload a new release with the fix. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe9dc

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-25 Thread Phillip Susi
On 6/25/2012 4:25 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: Your decision whether you upload into Debian experimental or unstable should not be affected by other derivative distribution policies. You can request syncing packages from experimental into Ubuntu, but the package will still land in Ubuntu's new que

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 07:41 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >> There is already an ext4-specific (depends on creation with -O extent) >> e4defrag >> tool in e2fsprogs since 1.42~WIP-2011-07-02-1. Is there a reason you would >> use >> one tool over the other? >>

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 07:40 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > Let me rephrase. > > Is upstream aware of the above bugs which affected the last version of > defrag in debian, which were not fixed in the upstream code? They appear to fall into 3 categories: ftbs,

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 05:25 PM, Eugene Paskevich wrote: > I wasn't very cautious to preserve any data before or after the defrag, > even more I've killed the file system already. > Sorry, I won't be useful in debugging. How about at least an overview of the c

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 04:36 PM, Eugene Paskevich wrote: > Just my 2 cents... > Tried to use it on my non-critical ext3 FS. The FS structure was corrupted, > fsck recovered some data (about 1%) into lost+found, 80% of data is lost w/o > any trace. > Well, it's

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 12:00 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > Have you taken over upstream maintainership as well? Yes. > This was always a tool which needed to be used with great caution, > and was removed for good reason. Is this safe to use with all > ext2, ext3

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-23 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/23/2012 07:27 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > The ITP was not sent to the debian-devel mailing list. Please use > report-bug in the future or add pseudo-header: > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > > Please forward your ITP to debian-de

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-23 Thread Phillip Susi
uthors and rotting for many years. I have taken over maintainership of it and would like to get it back into the archive. * Package name: e2defrag Version : 0.80 Upstream Author : Phillip Susi * URL : http://launchpad.net/e2defrag * License : GPL